##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research paper presented the experiences of a group of countries as pioneering models in the field of e-government and compared them to Jordan with the aim of evaluating their status at the global and continental levels. Methods for measuring and evaluating the development of E-government suggested using a method called multi-practice are a practice of multi methodology, which combines methods and techniques, and proposes to evaluate the tangible and intangible benefits of e-government, which shows that the multiplicity of aspects of measurement may lead to a kind of reliability in e-government also Methods for measuring and evaluating e-government performance proposed by international organizations,By United Nations E-Government Survey The comparison and evaluation were done using the e-government maturity index issued by the United Nations EGDI, which includes the Telecommunication Infrastructure Index (TII) and The human capital Index (HCI), and the Online Service Index (OSI) e-government service sub-indicator, in the period between 2008 and 2020, and this comparison comes in order to benefit from these experiences, redress weaknesses, and exploit the opportunities available to Jordan to develop its e-government, keep pace with the global movement and raise its efficiency in a way that serves the goals of sustainable development The results were that Jordan, according to by United Nations E-Government Survey Jordanian e-government is still in the first generation It has many improvements performance on the e-government index the change in the EGDI . Some comparisons of Jordan with Arab countries have been presented in the EGDI in 2020 for the United Nations report
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al-dweeri, R. M., Moreno, A. R., Montes, F. J. L., Obeidat, Z. M., & Al-dwairi, K. M. (2019). The effect of e-service quality on Jordanian student’s e-loyalty: an empirical study in online retailing. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Al-Nidawi, W. J. A., Al-Wassiti, S. K. J., Maan, M. A., & Othman, M. (2018). A review in E-government service quality measurement. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 10(3), 1257–1265.
Arayankalam, J., Khan, A., & Krishnan, S. (2020). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 102203.
Caiado, R. G. G., Leal Filho, W., Quelhas, O. L. G., de Mattos Nascimento, D. L., & Ávila, L. V. (2018). A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1276–1288.
Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017). A longitudinal study of e-government maturity. Information & Management, 54(4), 415–426.
Deng, H., Karunasena, K., & Xu, W. (2018). Evaluating the performance of e-government in developing countries. Internet Research.
eGovernment Program - Minister of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship. (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2021, from https://www.modee.gov.jo/En/Pages/eGovernment_Program
Faid, G., Tariq, M. M., Ishtiaq, A., Zeynvand, V. L., Meyer, D. F., & Máté, D. (2020). The nexus of E-government and increased productivity relative to income level comparison. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 18(1), 88–105.
Isaac, W. C. (2007). Performance measurement for the e-Government initiatives: A comparative study.
KASSEN, M., & Scholar, F. (n.d.). e-Government in the United States.
Kaur, B., Kaur, J., Pandey, S. K., & Joshi, S. (2020). E-service Quality: Development and Validation of the Scale. Global Business Review, 0972150920920452.
Kim, J. Y. (2018). The human capital gap: getting governments to invest in people. Foreign Aff., 97, 92.
Kraay, A. (2018). Methodology for a World Bank human capital index. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8593.
Machova, R., & Lnenicka, M. (2016). Modelling e-government development through the years using cluster analysis. JeDEM-EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 8(1), 62–83.
Molnár, P. (2020). Measuring e-government and e-participation. Prof. Dr. Miskolczi-Bodnár Péter (Eds.): Jog És Állam 29. Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Állam-És Jogtudományi Kar, Budapest.
Nations, U. (2020). United Nations E-Government Survey 2020. UN. https://doi.org/10.18356/8bdf045f-en
Nawafleh, S., Obiedat, R., & Harfoushi, O. (2012). E-government between developed and developing countries. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (IJAC), 5(1), 8–13.
OECD, O. for E. C. and D. (2003). The E-Government Imperative: OECD E-Government Studies. OECD.
Porumbescu, G. A. (2016). Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 291–304.
Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Thai, V. (2019). Evaluating the development of E-government in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, 254–258.
Stojanovska-Stefanova, A., Aleksoski, O., & Magdinceva Sopova, M. (2020). E-government and digital public services: The Macedonian case of digitalization. SocioBrains, International Scientific Refereed Online Journal with Impact Factor, 7(74), 35–52.
UN E-Government Survey 2020. (n.d.). Retrieved March 21, 2021, from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2020
Un, E. (2016). government survey 2014. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development/UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United Nations E-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development (With addendum on COVID-19 Response). (2020). https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210051453/read
Verma, N., Das, V. M., & Kalra, S. (2005). E-government tool kit for Developing countries. UNESCO, Asia Pacific Regional Bureau for Communication and Information.