##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Sep 12, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 742 Download : 393

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Examination weeks are the peaks of an academic year. The paper-and-pen test determines whether the learners are able to attain the specific educational standards set by the pedagogical curriculum they follow. The study wants to determine the pre-examination study preparation and its effect on the summative test score in general mathematics of grade 11 senior high school students of Dr. Carlos S. Lanting College. This study centers on two factors, the frequency and strategy of the student used on their pre-examination preparation. The descriptive and quantitative method of research is used in this study. As a results and conclusions in terms of pre- examination frequency, majority of the grade 11 senior high school students allotted one day (69.30%) before the examination 30 minutes to one hour (52.60%) as review time. The most preferred pre-examination study strategy of the respondents is rereading their textbooks and/or lecture notes (3.37 frequently). There is no significant positive correlation between the pre-examination study frequency and the summative test results, there is a significant positive correlation between Tracks and the summative test results and between the study strategy (rereading textbooks/lecture notes, and seeking assistance to parents) and the summative test results of the Grade 11 senior high school students of Dr. Carlos S. Lanting College. Lastly, avoid cramming, students spend at least three days of review before the examination for a better learning in a well managed time and engage their selves to the most significant favored review strategies that will give an impressive test results.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Malangen, A. D. (2021). Pre-Examination Study Preparation and Its Effect on the Summative Test Score in General Mathematics of Grade 11 Senior High School Students of Dr. Carlos S. Lanting College. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(9), 805-817. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.09.10

References

• Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., and McDaniel, M. A. Making it Stick: the Science of Successful Learning. Cam-bridge, MA: the Belknap Press Harvard University Press, 2014.
• Chen, P. Ph. D (2017). Thinking strategically about the study resources boosts students’ final grade retrieved at https//www.sciencedaily. com /releases/2017/05/1705011094252.htm
• Chorley, H., Connelly, W. & Finn, J. (2016). It does not Add Up: Why does 39% of our student population pay for math tutoring?. The Tam News Online. Retrieved at http//thetamnews.org/features/it-doesn’t-add-up-why-does-39-of-our-student-population-pay-for-math-tutoring/
• Congos, D. (nd) Self – Testring Concept: Discovering what has been learned before an exam. The Learning Center Newsletter. Retrieved at www.learningassistance.com
• Dunsloky J, Rawson KA, MARSH EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2013; 14:4-58.
• Espinoza, J. (2015). Teens’ Cram revision into night, ‘ survey says. The Telegraph. Retrieved at www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews /11497143/
• Hannah, K. (nd). 5 benefits of Cramming Right before a Test. The prospect. Re-trieved at www.theprospect.net
• Kang, S. (nd). Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center. An NSF Science Learning Center. Retrieved at http://tdlc/ucsd.edu/educators_ask_the_scientist_kang.html
• Karpicke JD, BUTLER AC, Roediger HL. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 2009;17:471-9.
• Mind Tools. (bd_. Review Strategies, Commiting Learning to Long-Term Memory. Retrieved at http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newlSS_05.htm
• Morgan, K. (nd). The Advantages of Internet in Education. Classroom. Retrieved at classroom.synonym.com/advantages-internet-education-554917.html
• Oxford Learning. Pros and Cons of Cramming. Retrieved at https://www.oxfordlearning.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-cramming/
• Schartek, A., & Pharm, D. (2014). Stop Rereading… and Try Self-Testing!. Re-trieved at http://edtheory.blogspot.com/2014/08/stop-re-reading-and-try-self-testing.html
• Stafford, T. (2014). Memory: Why cram-ming for test ofteng fails?. BBC FUTURE. Retrieved at http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140917-the-worst-way-to-learn
• St George, D. (2013). Grades ar in: June’s final exam in math shows more failure in montomery. The Wasington Post. Retrieved at http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/
• StudyPrep (2013). 7 Benefits of Study Groups. Retrieved at https://www.speedyprep.com/blog/7-benefits-of-study-groups/
• The Harvard Crimson (1965). Survey Reveals Students Believe It’s Better to Study than Cram. Retrieved at www.thecrimson.com/article/1965/4/17/
• Tutor Field (2017). Benefits and Disadvantages of Study Groups. Retrieved at http://tutorsfield.com.au/articles/2017/06/29/benefits -disadvantages-study-groups/
• Weimer, M. Ph.D. (2014). Is Rereading the Material a Good Study Strategy?. Faculty Focus: Higher Ed Strategy from Magna Publication. Retrieved at https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-professor-blog/rereading-material-good-study-strategy/
• West C, Sadoski M. Do study strategies predict academic performance in medical school? Med Educ. 2011;696-703.
• York University. Learning Skill Services (nd). Preparing for Tests and Exams. Re-trieved at http://lss.info.yorku.ca/resources/preparing -for-tests-and-exams/