Unlocking Creativity: Utilizing The 5 Whys Methodology to Illuminate Core Issues in Student Supreme Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.15Keywords:
Student Engagement, Internal Communication, Budget Allocation, 5 Whys methodologyAbstract
Student engagement programs served as catalysts for student development, community building, and active participation in campus life. This research explored the state of student engagement programs within the Supreme Student Government (SSG), focusing on their effectiveness and levels of student participation. Utilizing the 5 Whys methodology, the study identified and analyzed critical challenges and opportunities related to student motivation, program structure, and alignment with student interests. The findings revealed that internal communication breakdowns and budget constraints were significant factors impeding the effectiveness of SSG programs. Student participation was only moderate due to conflicting schedules with classes and insufficient program marketing. The rigid structure of SSG programs and a lengthy approval process further limited their ability to meet student needs. A disconnect between program content and student interests hindered engagement. The research concluded that the root causes of these problems lay in the need for more structured communication channels, a complex approval process, and misalignment with student interests. By addressing these underlying motives, recommendations included enhancing internal communication, allocating funds as efficiently as possible, and creating an inclusive learning environment. These strategies aimed to develop more effective and appealing student engagement programs, ultimately fostering a more active and engaged student body.
Downloads
References
Alden, J., Hill, L., Banks, F. M., Connolly, R., & Ngwa, J. (2021). Designing an educational program to promote diversity and stu-dent engagement in professional advoca-cy (SEPA). Journal of Occupational Ther-apy Education, 5(3), 15.
Amy Kurfist, P. (2022, April 29). Student be-longing: The next dei frontier in higher education. Hanover Research. https://www.hanoverresearch.com/insights-blog/student-belonging-the-next-dei-frontier-in-higher-education/?org=higher-education
Bell, J., Waters, S., & eBooks Corporation. (2014). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers (Sixth ed.). Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
Chandra, S. (2022, October 26). 12 key strate-gies to improve student retention. Cam-pusGroups. https://blog.campusgroups.com/campusgroups/2021/5/25/strategies-to-improve-student-retention
Costa, R. P., Novas, J. C., Fialho, A., & Moreira, P. (1970, January 1). Using student par-ticipation to improve higher education models: Lessons from the development of a comprehensive student participation plan. IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/using-student-participation-to-improve-higher-education-models/325914
Geraghty, J.R., Young, A.N., Berkel, T.D., Wall-bruch, E., Mann, J., Park, Y.S., Hirshfield, L.E., & Hyderi, A.A. (2019). Empowering medical students as agents of curricular change: a value-added approach to stu-dent engagement in medical educa-tion. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9, 60 - 65.
Global, P. (2023, March 29). Why Diversity in Colleges & Universities Matters. Purdue Global. https://www.purdueglobal.edu/blog/student-life/why-diversity-in-colleges-universities-matters/
Hardwick, J. (2023, December 4). How do search engines work? beginner’s guide. SEO Blog by Ahrefs. https://ahrefs.com/blog/how-do-search-engines-work/
Hensley, A., Hampton, D., Wilson, J. L., Culp-Roche, A., & Wiggins, A. T. (2021). A mul-ticenter study of student engagement and satisfaction in online programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(5), 259-264.
Jones, H. (2020). When the Journey is as Im-portant as the Destination: Time-Averaged Retention as an Alternate Measure of Student Engagement and Program Impact. Student Success, 11(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i1.1464
Kalkantova, A. (2022). Effective Internal Com-munications in 6 steps. Open Social. https://www.getopensocial.com/blog/community-management/effective-internal-communications-in-6-steps/
Kirchner, M. J., & Pepper, S. (2020). Student veteran engagement in online educa-tion. New Directions for Adult and Con-tinuing Education, 2020(166), 95-109.
Mowreader, A. (2023, October 25). Six strate-gies to encourage college campus event attendance. Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/college-experience/2023/10/25/six-strategies-encourage-college-campus-event
Norze, J. (2020). Examining online student en-gagement in a program development course offered at a research university in the southern region of the u. S. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN DEVEL-OPMENT, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v9n2a2
Roudebush, M., Murray, D. W., Netschytailo, H., & Jensen, T. M. (2024). Patterns and predictors of adolescent engagement in a mindfulness‐based social–emotional learning program. Journal of Adolescence.
Roush, C., Kruger, B. J., Jobli, E., Connelly, L. K., Cummings, C., & Comeaux, J. M. (2020). Nursing Student Engagement in a Pro-gram-Wide Community-Based Learning Curriculum. Community-Based Transfor-mational Learning: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry into Student Experiences and Challenges, 97.
Saqr, M., & López-Pernas, S. (2021). The longi-tudinal trajectories of online engagement over a full program. Computers & Educa-tion, 175, 104325.
Serrat, O. D. (2009). The five WHYS technique. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/five-whys-technique
Stewart, L. (2024, April 8). What is purposive sampling? Explanation, uses, Pros & Cons. ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/purposive-sampling
Symons, J., & Rohl, K. (2020, June). Faculty perceptions of industry sponsorships in capstone design courses. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
Villegas, F. (2023). Student engagement: What it is & how to increase it. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/student-engagement/
Wilkinson, M. (2023, September 22). Bing vs. google: Comparing the two search en-gines. Semrush Blog. https://www.semrush.com/blog/bing-vs-google/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
