Challenges and Benefits of Inquiry-Based Learning in Physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.07.26Keywords:
Benefits of Inquiry-based Learning, Challenges in Physics, Learning Styles, Collaborative Learning, Problem-solvingAbstract
This qualitative research study investigates the experiences of Grade 12 STEM students in inquiry-based learning in physics at a private high school in Central Mindanao. The study aims to understand the challenges and benefits of this teaching approach, considering factors such as gender, academic performance, and prior exposure to inquiry-based learning (IBL). The study involved ten students who were selected through purposive sampling. The data were collected through one-on-one interviews. The findings reveal that the most challenging experience students faced in inquiry-based learning are problem-solving, lecture and laboratory activities, and theoretical concepts. Meanwhile, the benefits of IBL include collaborative learning, interactive discussions, and enhanced interest in learning. Most students preferred hands-on learning, while few preferred auditory and visual learning. The study suggests that development in IBL can be made based on students' challenges and learning styles, and the benefits that they can get from the approach in a supportive learning environment.
Downloads
References
Adunola, O. (2011) An analysis of the relation-ship between class size and academic performance of students. Ego Booster Book: Ogun State, Nigeria.: https://www.ijsshr.com/journal/index.php/IJSSHR/article/view/845
Aikenhead, G.S. (2006) Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/H_Carlone_Review_2006.pdf
Arreytambe, T. (2011) A Multimedia Learning System for Selected Topics of Physics (Doctoral dissertation). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260735753_A_Multimedia_Learning_System_for_selected_topics_of_Physics
Ayeni, A.J. (2011) Teachers' Professional De-velopment and Quality Assurance in Ni-gerian Secondary Schools. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 143-149. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159059.pdf
Azavedo, M. (2013) Interest and Motivation in Learner-Centered Animal Sciences Edu-cation (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University Graduate School). https://hammer.purdue.edu/articles/thesis/Interest_and_Motivation_in_Learner-Cen-tered_Animal_Sciences_Education/8985734
Balta, N., et al. (2024). High school physics teachers’ pedagogical discontentment: The effect of curriculum improvement and professional development programs. Heliyon, 10(2), e24274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24274
Bhandari, P. (2022). What Is Quantitative Re-search? | Definition, Uses & Methods. The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 15(1), pp 7-21. DOI: 10.1177/0973801020981161
Bioco, M. S., & Echaure, J. S. (2021). Inquiry-Based Teaching Practices, Attitudes, and Difficulties of Secondary Science Teach-ers in Masinloc District Division of Zam-bales for S.Y. 2020-2021. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Busi-ness and Education Research, 2(11), 1074-1084. https://doi.org/10.11594/10.11594/ijmaber.02.11.08
Brown, J. Adler R. P, (2008) Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause review, 43(1), 16-20. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/48488/
Cairns, D. Areepattamannil. S. (2019) Explor-ing the relations of inquiry-based teach-ing to science achievement and disposi-tions in 54 countries. Res. Sci. Educ. 49 1–23. 10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317491929_Exploring_the_Relations_of_Inquiry-Based_Teaching_to_Science_Achievement_and_Dispositions_in_54_Countries
Candido, K. J. O., Gillesania, K. C. C., Mercado, J. C., & Reales, J. M. B. (2022). Interactive Simulation on Modern Physics: A System-atic Review. International Journal of Mul-tidisciplinary: Applied Business and Edu-cation Research, 3(8), 1452-1462. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.08.08
Chang, H. Y. (2013) Teacher guidance to medi-ate student inquiry through interactive dynamic visualizations. Instructional Sci-ence, 41, 895-920. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235702501_Teacher_guidance_to_medi-ate_student_inquiry_throughinteractive_dynamic_visualizations
Cobb, P. Hodge, L. Barron, B. Hickey, D. Azevedo, F. Joseph, D. & Edelson,D. (2004) Design Theories of Interest, Moti-vation, and Engagement for the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org/handle/1/4067
Creswell, John W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. (5). Los An-geles: SAGE Publications.
De Jong et al. (2023). Let's talk evidence – The case for combining inquiry-based and di-rect instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536
Deslauriers, L. Mc Carty, L. S. Miller, K. Calla-ghan, K. & Kestin, G. (2019) Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the Na-tional Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1821936116?referralCode=cnfg6x0
Erinosho, S. Y. (2013) How do students per-ceive the difficulty of physics in second-ary school? An exploratory study in Nige-ria. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 3(3), 1510-1515. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307742474_How_Do_Students_Perceive_the_Difficulty_of_Physics_in_Secondary_School_An_Exploratory_Study_in_Nigeria
Fan, J.Y. Ye, J.H. (2022) The effectiveness of inquiry and practice during project de-sign courses at a technology university. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 859164. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psycholo-gy/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859164/full
Federici, R. A, Skaalvik, E. M. (2014) Students' Perceptions of Emotional and Instrumen-tal Teacher Support: Relations with Moti-vational and Emotional Responses. Inter-national education studies, 7(1), 21-36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280317704_Students'_Perceptions_of_Emotion-al_and_Instrumental_Teacher_Support_Rela-tions_with_Motivational_and_Emotional_Responses
Gok, L. Silay, M. G. (2009) Investigating the impact of using cooperative learning strategies on promoting students’ science learning in private schools in UAE (Doc-toral dissertation, The British University in Dubai (BUiD)). https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/items/b020e164-5f68-48e0-9476-6fd6b5087c8e
Gungor, K. H. Ozkan, İ. (2011) The effect of the 5e ınstructional model enriched with cooperative learning and animations on seventh-grade students’ academic achievement and scientific attitudes. In-ternational Electronic Journal of Elemen-tary Education, 9(1), 21. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/143
Guraya, S. Y., & Abdalla, M. E. (2020). Deter-mining the effectiveness of peer-assisted learning in medical education: A system-atic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15(3), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.05.002
Heng, K. Sol, K. (2022) Education: Key to mak-ing Cambodia great again. Cambodia De-velopment Center, 4(3), 1-18. https://cd-center.org/wp-con-tent/uploads/2022/06/P124_V4IS3_20220621_EN.pdf
Iqbal, M., Velan, G. M., O’Sullivan, A. J., & Bal-asooriya, C. (2016). Differential impact of student behaviours on group interaction and collaborative learning: medical stu-dents’ and tutors’ perspectives. BMC med-ical education, 16, 1-11. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84983372758&origin=inward&txGid=8df9c379c8d8c92edf4e2fab02977447
Jang, S. J. (2008) Innovations in science teach-er education: Effects of integrating tech-nology and team-teaching strate-gies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222310120_Innovations_in_science_teacher_education_Effects_of_integrating_technology_and_team-teaching_strategies
Jerrim, J. Oliver, M. Sims, S. (2020) The rela-tionship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in Eng-land. Learn. Instr. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101310. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475220301006
Kayalar, Filiz & Kayalar, Fethi. (2017). The ef-fects of Auditory Learning Strategy on Learning Skills of Language Learners (Students' Views). IOSR Journal Of Hu-manities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 22. http://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2210070410.
Kim, M. S. (2014). Doing social constructivist research means making empathic and aesthetic connections with participants. European Early Childhood Education Re-search Journal, 22(4), 538-553. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267397255_Doing_social_constructivist_research_means_making_empathic_and_aesthetic_connections_with_participants
Kori, K. (2021) “Inquiry-based learning in higher education,” in Technology sup-ported active learning, eds C. Vaz de Car-valho and M. Bauters (Berlin: Springer), 59–74. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2082-9_4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158470/
Korkman, N. Metin, M. (2021) The Effect of Inquiry-Based Collaborative Learning and Inquiry-Based Online Collaborative Learning on Success and Permanent Learning of Students. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 151-159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350343100_The_Effect_of_Inquiry-Based_Collaborative_Learning_and_Inquiry-Based_Online_Collaborative_Learning_on_Suc-cess_and_Permanent_Learning_of_Students
Kunaril, N. K. (2006) Teachers’ Perceptions on Using Audio-Materials in Teaching Listen-ing Skills (Doctoral dissertation). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=24.%09Kunaril%2C+N.+K.+%282006%29+Teachers%E2%80%99+Perceptions+on+Using+Audio-Materi-als+in+Teaching+Listening+Skills+%28Doctoral+dissertation%29.&btnG=
Lee, et al, (2014) Extending inquiry-based ed-ucation in creative disciplines through as-sessment. In Inquiry-Based Learning for the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (pp. 345-368). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272818815_Inquiry-Based_Learning_for_Arts_Humanities_and_Social_Sciences_Programs
Lohri, R. S. (2008) Learning styles and visual literacy for learning and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 538-545. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82167009.pdf
Lumabit, A. M. C., & Sagge, Jr., R. G. (1). An In-quiry-Based Learning Module for General Mathematics: Its’ Development and Eval-uation. International Journal of Multidis-ciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2749-2756. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.08
Miller, D. K. (2014) The effect of inquiry-based, hands-on labs on achievement in middle school science. Liberty University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/1f1b292e96f7c2890c8135fc2fa60f96/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Misra, P. K. (2019) Teaching Teachers to Use Constructivist Approaches: A Proposal. Journal on School Educational Technolo-gy, 14(4), 56-63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1222144
Mohanty, S. (2001) A study to analyze the ef-fectiveness of audio-visual aids in the teaching-learning process at university level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sci-ences, 28, 78-81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811024554
Ogunleye, A. O. (2009) Teachers and students perceptions of students problem-solving difficulties in physics: Implications for remediation. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(7). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268110475.pdf
Ornek, F. Robinson, W. R. Haugan, M. P, (2008) What Makes Physics Difficult?. In-ternational Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 30-34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ894842
Pedaste, M. et. al, (2015) Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the in-quiry cycle. Educ. Res. Rev. 14, 47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X15000068
Pitzer, J. Skinner, E. (2017) Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resili-ence over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity. International Jour-nal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 15-29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0165025416642051
Saka, E. (2023) Teachers' opinions On the Ap-plicability of Model Eliciting Activities. In-ternational Journal of Education, Tech-nology and Science, 3(3), 1053-1077. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373598008_TEACHERS'_OPINIONS_ON_THE_APPLICABILITY_OF_MODEL_ELICITING_ACTIVITIES
Saleh, S. Yakob, N. (2014) Physics teachers’ instructional practices in Malaysian schools. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 5(1), 12-30. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=33.%09Saleh%2C+S.+Yakob%2C+N.+%282014%29+Physics+teachers%E2%80%99+instructional+practic-es+in+Malaysian+schools.+International+Jour-nal+of+Teaching+and+Case+Studies%2C+5%281%29%2C+12-30.&btnG=
Serrano, J. M. Pons, R. M. (2007) Cooperative learning: We can also do it without task structure. Intercultural Education, 18(3), 215-230. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14675980701463562
Teig, N. Scherer, R. Nilsen, T. (2018) More isn’t always better: the curvilinear relation-ship between inquiry-based teaching and student achievement in science. Learn. Instr. 56, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.006 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959475217305832
Topsakal, T. (2010) "The effect of problem-based stem education on the student's critical thinking tendencies and their per-ceptions for problem-solving skills." Sci-ence Education International 33, no. 2 (2022): 136-145. https://icaseonline.net/journal/index.php/sei/article/view/400
Unlusoy, A. (2006) The Effect of Inquiry-Based Collaborative Learning and Inquiry-Based Online Collaborative Learning on Success and Permanent Learning of Students. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 151-159. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1292922
V.O.M. Ventista and C. Brown. (2023). Teach-ers’ professional learning and its impact on students’ learning outcomes: Findings from a systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100565
Wang, M. T. Holcombe, R. (2010) Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, en-gagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational
Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0002831209361209
Yilmaz, R. Karaoglan, Yilmaz, F. G. Keser, H. (2020) Vertical versus shared e-leadership approach in online project-based learning: a comparison of self-regulated learning skills, motivation, and group collaboration processes. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 628-654. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12528-020-09250-2
Zeeb, M. S. (2004) Improving student success through matching learning and teaching styles. An Unpublished Master of Arts in Education (M. A (Ed)) Project, University of Phoenix, Tempe, Arizona. https://www.consultica.com/media/uni-phoenix-research-study-s.-zeeb.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
