##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Published
Oct 25, 2024
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 409
Download : 126
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Main Article Content
Abstract
s the Philippines strives best to teach Filipino learners how to become globally competent learners and workers of the world in the future through its implementation of K-12 and the teaching of research subjects, it is befitting to assess how students are being prepared for writing research. While other countries conduct research consultations by scheduling appointments with librarians, the schools in the country make the most out of their teachers by serving as research consultants at the same time. This study analyzes how research consultations with Practical Research 1 teachers influence the perceived preparedness of 16 Grade 11 students in one non-sectarian school in Marikina City through qualitative narrative research. Based on the findings, it is concluded that the students view research consultations as a beneficial activity that improves their research writing and communication skills. Although beneficial, challenges such as incoherent feedback from validators, appointment conflicts, and miscommunication hinder them from maximizing the use of research consultations. In the end, the researchers recommend improving research consultation tools and management, and conducting a longitudinal quantitative approach to assess the effectiveness of research consultations in enhancing the competencies of students in research writing.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Aure, A. D., Ibañes, S. B., Ty, G. J. P., & Bagares, R. C. A. (2024). Empowering Young Researchers: The Influence of Research Consultations on the Perceived Preparedness of Grade 11 Students in Research Writing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(10), 4010-4029. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.10.18
References
Altun, M. (2015). The evolvement of the term Communicative Competence - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f5121f77ec3d5af3b700f29a4f6226af/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=4672073
Bradley, D., Oehrli, A., Rieh, S. Y., Hanley, E., & Matzke, B. (2020). Advancing the refer-ence narrative: Assessing student learn-ing in research consultations. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29634
Bruce, S. (2020). Teaching with Care: A Rela-tional Approach to Individual Research Consultations – In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/teaching-with-care/
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case exam-ples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Caraig, R. V. (2022). A proposed faculty loading guide framework for the research subjects in the senior high school in the Philip-pines. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1383068
Carndruff, C. (2024) Exploring the Disad-vantages of Virtual Communication. https://www.coffeepals.com/blog/exploring-the-disadvantages-of-virtual-communication
Casanova, V. (2021). Predictors of Graduate Students’ Research Performance in the Philippine State-Run Higher Education Institution. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(1). 10.5539/jel.v10n5p170
Chandra, Y. & Shang, L. (2019). Inductive Cod-ing. In: Qualitative Research Using R: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Singa-pore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3170-1_8
Clare, M. M. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods Render and Advance Consulta-tion Practice: Here’s Why that Matters. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 32(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1768859
Clark, K., Duckham, M., Guillemin, M., Hunter, A., McVernon, J., O’Keefe, C., Pitkin, C., Prawer, S., Sinnott, R., Warr, D., & Way-cott, J. (2018). Advancing the ethical use of digital data in human research: chal-lenges and strategies to promote ethical practice. Ethics and Information Technol-ogy, 21(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9490-4
Cutilas, A., Benolirao, E., Camasura, J., Goblin, R. Jr., Yamagishi, K., & Ocampo, L. (2023). Does Mentoring Directly Improve Stu-dents’ Research Skills?Examining the Role of Information Literacy andCompe-tency Development. Education Sciences, 13(7), 694. 10.3390/educsci13070694
Deller, J. (2022, December 10). Bloom’s Tax-onomy Levels of Learning: The complete post. https://kodosurvey.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-levels-learning-complete-post#google_vignette
Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2021, June 08). What is Peer Debriefing in Qualita-tive Research? https://delvetool.com/blog/peerdebriefing
DepEd. (2013c). K to 12 curriculum guide: Practical Research 1. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Applied_Research-1-CG.pdf
Eaton, S. E., & Hughes, J. C. (2022). Academic integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Es-sential Challenge. Springer Nature.
Estacio, L. C., Barcelona, A. B., & Mejia, I. P. (2018). RESEARCH CAPABILITIES OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 370–377). http://iccd.asia/ojs/index.php/iccd/article/download/55/54
Exploring the disadvantages of virtual com-munication. (n.d.). https://www.coffeepals.com/blog/exploring-the-disadvantages-of-virtual-communication
Faix, A., MacDonald, A., & Taxakis, B. (n.d.) Research consultation effectiveness for freshman and senior undergraduate stu-dents. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/df976a82-be09-4b60-9934-46dee938f807/content
George, E. (2024, April 24). Top 10 Qualities and Characteristics of a good Researcher | Researcher.Life. https://researcher.life/blog/article/becoming-a-good-researcher-10-must-have-characteristics-for-success/
Glaser, B. (2023) What Is Communication Ap-prehension and How Do You Beat It?. https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/what-is-communication-apprehension
Golsteijn, C., & Wright, S. (2013). Using narra-tive research and portraiture to inform design research. Lecture Notes in Com-puter Science, 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40477-1_19
Houston Community College Libraries. (2024, May 8). Libraries: Research for writing: Articulate a thesis. https://library.hccs.edu/c.php?g=981920&p=7099906
Idol‐Maestas, L., & Ritter, S. (1985). A follow-up study of resource/ consulting teach-ers. Teacher Education and Special Edu-cation, 8(3), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840648500800302
Why a motivated teacher is key to the class-room? (2017) Impact Teachers. https://impactteachers.com/blog/motivated-teacher-key-class-room/#:~:text=It%20shapes%20how%20students%20approach,thinkers%2C%20innovators%2C%20and%20leaders.
Importance of providing meaningful student feedback - Center for Teaching Excel-lence | University of South Carolina. (n.d.). https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/teaching_resources/grading_assessment_toolbox/providing_meaningful_student_feedback/index.php
Jaaffar, A. H., Ibrahim, H. I., Rajadurai, J., & So-hail, M. S. (2019). Psychological Impact of Work-Integrated Learning Programmes in Malaysia: The Moderating Role of Self-Esteem on Relation between Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence. Social Science Re-search Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3922000
Kiessling, C., & Fabry, G. (2021). What is com-municative competence and how can it be acquired? DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001445
Lucas, M. D., Bernal, H. L., & Lucas, M. P. (2021). TEACHING PRACTICAL RE-SEARCH FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL; AN IN-DEPTH STUDY. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v1n2a61
Magi, T. & Mardeusz, P. (2013) Why Some Stu-dents Continue t Why Some Students Con-tinue to Value Individual, F alue Individu-al, Face-to-Face Research Consultations in a Technology-Rich World. University of Vermont. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcon-tent.cgi?article=1014&context=libfacpub
McKim, C. (2019). Meaningful Member-Checking: A Structured Approach to Member Checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr
Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Relationship between Analytical Thinking Skill and Scientific Argumentation Using PBL with Interactive CK 12 Simulation. International Journal on Social and Edu-cation Sciences, 1(1), 16–23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264056.pdf
Reiter, L., & Cole, C. (2019). Beyond Face Val-ue: Evaluating Research Consultations from the Student Perspective. Reference and User Services Quarterly/Reference & User Services Quarterly, 59(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.59.1.7222
Shaw, K., Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2013). Student experience of final-year under-graduate research projects: an explora-tion of ‘research preparedness.’ Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.592937
Sikora, L., Fournier, K., & Rebner, J. (2019). Exploring the impact of individualized re-search consultations using pre and post-testing in an academic library: a Mixed Methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29500
Staff, H., & Staff, H. (2024, February 14). What is communication apprehension and how do you beat it? HRDQ. https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/what-is-communication-apprehension
Stapleton, J., Carter, C., & Bredahl, L. (2020). Research consultations in the academic library: A scoping review on current themes in instruction, assessment and technology. the Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 46(4), 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102156
Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Tech-nology, 28(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319
Western Governors University. (2020). What is cognitive learning? https://www.wgu.edu/blog/what-is-cognitive-learning2003.html
Yi, H. (2003), “Individual research consultation service: an important part of an infor-mation literacy program”, Reference Ser-vices Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 342-350, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00907320310505636 (accessed May 16, 2012)
Bradley, D., Oehrli, A., Rieh, S. Y., Hanley, E., & Matzke, B. (2020). Advancing the refer-ence narrative: Assessing student learn-ing in research consultations. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29634
Bruce, S. (2020). Teaching with Care: A Rela-tional Approach to Individual Research Consultations – In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/teaching-with-care/
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case exam-ples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Caraig, R. V. (2022). A proposed faculty loading guide framework for the research subjects in the senior high school in the Philip-pines. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1383068
Carndruff, C. (2024) Exploring the Disad-vantages of Virtual Communication. https://www.coffeepals.com/blog/exploring-the-disadvantages-of-virtual-communication
Casanova, V. (2021). Predictors of Graduate Students’ Research Performance in the Philippine State-Run Higher Education Institution. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(1). 10.5539/jel.v10n5p170
Chandra, Y. & Shang, L. (2019). Inductive Cod-ing. In: Qualitative Research Using R: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Singa-pore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3170-1_8
Clare, M. M. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods Render and Advance Consulta-tion Practice: Here’s Why that Matters. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 32(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1768859
Clark, K., Duckham, M., Guillemin, M., Hunter, A., McVernon, J., O’Keefe, C., Pitkin, C., Prawer, S., Sinnott, R., Warr, D., & Way-cott, J. (2018). Advancing the ethical use of digital data in human research: chal-lenges and strategies to promote ethical practice. Ethics and Information Technol-ogy, 21(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9490-4
Cutilas, A., Benolirao, E., Camasura, J., Goblin, R. Jr., Yamagishi, K., & Ocampo, L. (2023). Does Mentoring Directly Improve Stu-dents’ Research Skills?Examining the Role of Information Literacy andCompe-tency Development. Education Sciences, 13(7), 694. 10.3390/educsci13070694
Deller, J. (2022, December 10). Bloom’s Tax-onomy Levels of Learning: The complete post. https://kodosurvey.com/blog/blooms-taxonomy-levels-learning-complete-post#google_vignette
Delve, Ho, L., & Limpaecher, A. (2021, June 08). What is Peer Debriefing in Qualita-tive Research? https://delvetool.com/blog/peerdebriefing
DepEd. (2013c). K to 12 curriculum guide: Practical Research 1. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Applied_Research-1-CG.pdf
Eaton, S. E., & Hughes, J. C. (2022). Academic integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Es-sential Challenge. Springer Nature.
Estacio, L. C., Barcelona, A. B., & Mejia, I. P. (2018). RESEARCH CAPABILITIES OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 370–377). http://iccd.asia/ojs/index.php/iccd/article/download/55/54
Exploring the disadvantages of virtual com-munication. (n.d.). https://www.coffeepals.com/blog/exploring-the-disadvantages-of-virtual-communication
Faix, A., MacDonald, A., & Taxakis, B. (n.d.) Research consultation effectiveness for freshman and senior undergraduate stu-dents. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/df976a82-be09-4b60-9934-46dee938f807/content
George, E. (2024, April 24). Top 10 Qualities and Characteristics of a good Researcher | Researcher.Life. https://researcher.life/blog/article/becoming-a-good-researcher-10-must-have-characteristics-for-success/
Glaser, B. (2023) What Is Communication Ap-prehension and How Do You Beat It?. https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/what-is-communication-apprehension
Golsteijn, C., & Wright, S. (2013). Using narra-tive research and portraiture to inform design research. Lecture Notes in Com-puter Science, 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40477-1_19
Houston Community College Libraries. (2024, May 8). Libraries: Research for writing: Articulate a thesis. https://library.hccs.edu/c.php?g=981920&p=7099906
Idol‐Maestas, L., & Ritter, S. (1985). A follow-up study of resource/ consulting teach-ers. Teacher Education and Special Edu-cation, 8(3), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840648500800302
Why a motivated teacher is key to the class-room? (2017) Impact Teachers. https://impactteachers.com/blog/motivated-teacher-key-class-room/#:~:text=It%20shapes%20how%20students%20approach,thinkers%2C%20innovators%2C%20and%20leaders.
Importance of providing meaningful student feedback - Center for Teaching Excel-lence | University of South Carolina. (n.d.). https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/cte/teaching_resources/grading_assessment_toolbox/providing_meaningful_student_feedback/index.php
Jaaffar, A. H., Ibrahim, H. I., Rajadurai, J., & So-hail, M. S. (2019). Psychological Impact of Work-Integrated Learning Programmes in Malaysia: The Moderating Role of Self-Esteem on Relation between Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence. Social Science Re-search Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3922000
Kiessling, C., & Fabry, G. (2021). What is com-municative competence and how can it be acquired? DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001445
Lucas, M. D., Bernal, H. L., & Lucas, M. P. (2021). TEACHING PRACTICAL RE-SEARCH FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL; AN IN-DEPTH STUDY. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v1n2a61
Magi, T. & Mardeusz, P. (2013) Why Some Stu-dents Continue t Why Some Students Con-tinue to Value Individual, F alue Individu-al, Face-to-Face Research Consultations in a Technology-Rich World. University of Vermont. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/cgi/viewcon-tent.cgi?article=1014&context=libfacpub
McKim, C. (2019). Meaningful Member-Checking: A Structured Approach to Member Checking. American Journal of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr
Perdana, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Relationship between Analytical Thinking Skill and Scientific Argumentation Using PBL with Interactive CK 12 Simulation. International Journal on Social and Edu-cation Sciences, 1(1), 16–23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264056.pdf
Reiter, L., & Cole, C. (2019). Beyond Face Val-ue: Evaluating Research Consultations from the Student Perspective. Reference and User Services Quarterly/Reference & User Services Quarterly, 59(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.59.1.7222
Shaw, K., Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2013). Student experience of final-year under-graduate research projects: an explora-tion of ‘research preparedness.’ Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.592937
Sikora, L., Fournier, K., & Rebner, J. (2019). Exploring the impact of individualized re-search consultations using pre and post-testing in an academic library: a Mixed Methods study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29500
Staff, H., & Staff, H. (2024, February 14). What is communication apprehension and how do you beat it? HRDQ. https://hrdqstore.com/blogs/hrdq-blog/what-is-communication-apprehension
Stapleton, J., Carter, C., & Bredahl, L. (2020). Research consultations in the academic library: A scoping review on current themes in instruction, assessment and technology. the Journal of Academic
Librarianship, 46(4), 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102156
Tanis, C. J. (2020). The seven principles of online learning: Feedback from faculty and alumni on its importance for teaching and learning. Research in Learning Tech-nology, 28(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2319
Western Governors University. (2020). What is cognitive learning? https://www.wgu.edu/blog/what-is-cognitive-learning2003.html
Yi, H. (2003), “Individual research consultation service: an important part of an infor-mation literacy program”, Reference Ser-vices Review, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 342-350, available at: www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/00907320310505636 (accessed May 16, 2012)