##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Nov 24, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 42 Download : 22

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aims to explore the relationship between motivation and job performance among government personnel in public sector organ-izations. Specifically, it seeks to understand how various motivational factors influence employee productivity and overall performance in the context of public sector work environments. Motivation theories like Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs (1943) which are composed of five levels of human needs for survival, an individual’s lower-level needs must be satisfied before they can address their higher-level needs. In-trinsic motivation engages a person in an activity for self-satisfaction while extrinsic motivation drives a person to function due to rewards or punishment. This allows us to foresee the incoming demotivator for the personnel and how it affects the performance of the agency where they work. The study used a quantitative research design through a Likert scale questionnaire research instrument. Descriptive statistics and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were applied to ana-lyze the data, acknowledging potential biases from personal beliefs, professional background, and participant interaction to enhance the study's reliability. The survey results indicated a balanced gender dis-tribution among respondents, falling in the 26 to 35 age group, and most were identified as permanent government personnel. The overall sentiment toward intrinsic motivation and recognition in the work-place was positive, suggesting a healthy organizational climate and a need for improved recognition practices. Additionally, significant dif-ferences in job motivation were noted based on age and length of ser-vice, particularly in the areas of career advancement opportunities and job security. Furthermore, the study reveals that career advancement opportunities are the main motivator for government personnel's job performance, with intrinsic motivation recognized as important, while training programs,
performance-based bonuses, and team-building activities are effective strategies for enhancing motivation across diverse demographic profiles.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fabre, J. A. H., Liban-Benemerito, D. K. J. G., Alejandro, J. I., Malang, B. P., & Malang, J. D. (2024). Exploring The Impact of Motivation on Job Performance: A Study of Government Personnel in Public Sector Organizations. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(11), 4526-4545. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.11.20

References

Amaryllis-Torres, R. (1989). Motivational fac-tors among government employees. Ma-nila: University Press.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transforma-tional leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transforma-tional leadership. Psychology Press.
Brunner, H. I., & Giannini, E. H. (2011). Text-book of pediatric rheumatology (6th ed., pp. 127-156). Elsevier. DOI 10.1016/B978-1-4160-6581-4.10007-X.
David, M. P. (2023). Motivation and Job Satis-faction among Untenured employees in the Municipality of Concepcion, Tarlac. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educa-tional Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Engidaw, A. E. (2021). The effect of motivation on employee engagement in public
sectors: in the case of North Wollo zone. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneur-ship
Engidaw, A. E. (2021). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on employee per-formance in the firm. Journal of Business Research.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. DOI 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Hernandez, M. (2016). Motivation and job per-formance in the public sector. Public Ad-ministration Review, 76(2), 245-256. DOI 10.1111/puar.12412.
Hernandez, S. A. (2016). The impact of extrin-sic motivation on productivity. Employee Relations, 38(2), 275-294.
Hilario, G. J. E. (2018). Towards Motivated Government Civilian Employees: An As-sessment of the Job Satisfaction and Job Performance of the Philippine National Police - Quezon City Police District’s Non-Uniformed Personnel.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Jour-nal, 33(4), 692-724.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengage-ment at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. DOI 10.5465/256287.
Legault, L. (2016) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Moti-vation. Springer International Publishing AG 2016. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1139-1.
Maniragaba Rauben (2023). Influence of In-trinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and Em-ployees’ Job Satisfaction in the Local Government: A Case of Kamwenge Dis-trict, Uganda.
Narag, A. M. (2018). Motivational Factors Af-fecting the Job Performance of Employ-ees of Cagayan State University Lallo Campus. International Journal of Ad-vanced Research in Management and So-cial Sciences.
Nini, M. (2019). Job performance: Why task and contextual performance matter from an Evidence-based Management perspec-tive. Retrieved on October 8, 2024 from https://www.ckju.net/en/dossier/job-performance-evidence-based-management-perspective-why-task-and-contextual-performance-matters/1258.
Pangan, F., Hechanova, M. R., Franco, E. P., Mercado, R. H., & Lopez, C.V. (2008). In R. Hechanova & E. Franco (Eds.), Leading Philippine organizations in a changing world (pp. 49-60).
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motiva-tional bases of public service. Public Ad-ministration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motiva-tional bases of public service. Public Ad-ministration Review, 50(3), 367-373. DOI 10.2307/976618
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and man-aging public organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and man-aging public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social develop-ment, and well-being. American Psy-chologist, 55(1), 68.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social develop-ment, and well-being. American Psy-chologist, 55(1), 68-78. DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Tiglao-Torres, A. (1989). Work Motivation and productivity of government workers. Philippine Journal of Psychology.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86(4), 1089-1105.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Government's re-sponsibility: What motivates public ser-vice? Public Management Review, 10(1), 1-19. DOI 10.1080/14719030701861834.
Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behavior: Inte-grating multiple levels of analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 361-401. DOI 10.1080/19416520.2013.773400.