Main Article Content

Abstract

Traffic signs are vital for ensuring motorists safety on the road, but their effectiveness relies on drivers comprehending their meaning and demonstrating the appropriate actions. This study investigated the traffic sign comprehension of 324 Aeta respondents using a three-part questionnaire: a survey on respondents’ agreement with traffic sign meanings and actions, a matching test to identify traffic sign names, both using convenience sampling, and an interview us-ing purposive sampling. The researcher utilized a convergent paral-lel mixed method design, examining quantitative data with descrip-tive statistics and qualitative data with thematic analysis. The key findings indicate that the overall traffic sign comprehension mean score of the respondents was 3.35, interpreted as “Average,” sug-gesting a general understanding of traffic signs with room for im-provement in specific areas. The data also reveals that the most cor-rectly identified signs in the matching test were those reinforced with both verbal and non-verbal elements and those frequently en-countered, such as the informative sign “Slow Vehicles Use Right Lane” (49.4 %), the warning sign “Slippery When Wet” (47.8%), the regulatory sign “Stop Sign” (66.0%) and the road marking “Single Solid Yellow Line” (46.6%). Most Aeta motorists began driving at a young age without formal training, mostly learning through obser-vations and guidance from family and relatives, leading to misun-derstandings of traffic signs. Interviews highlighted that financial difficulties, lack of resources, and illiteracy prevent many Aeta mo-torists from obtaining driver’s licenses and vehicle registrations. Additionally, they often face prejudice and discrimination, being unfairly blamed for motor vehicle accidents. These findings empha-size the importance of specialized educational initiatives and cul-turally appropriate driving instruction to promote traffic sign litera-cy among Aeta motorists. Proposed initiatives include the develop-ment of simple, engaging materials, such as a tri-fold brochure con-taining locally translated traffic sign names,
explanations of Kapampangan language, and pictures. Other rec-ommendations include free or subsidized driver education courses and improved traffic signs combining verbal and non-verbal ele-ments to enhance comprehension.

Article Details

How to Cite
Inong, C. B. (2025). Comprehension of Traffic Signs among Aeta Motorists: From Challenges to Solutions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(1), 92-108. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.01.07

References

Abduljabbar, A., Jaleel, Z. T., & Salman, N. D. (2020). Traffic signs comprehension study. IOP Conference Series, 737(1), 012143. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/737/1/012143
Al-Madani, H.M., & Al-Janahi, A. (2002). As-sessment of drivers' comprehension of traffic signs based on their traffic, per-sonal and social characteristics. Trans-portation Research Part F-traffic Psy-chology and Behaviour, 5, 63-76.
Bañares, J. R., Caballes, S. A., Serdan, M. J., Lig-gayu, A. T., & Bongo, M. F. (2018). A com-prehension-based ergonomic redesign of Philippine Road warning signs. Interna-tional Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 65, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.011.
Ben-Bassat, T., Shinar, D., Almqvist, R., Caird, J. K., Dewar, R. L., Lehtonen, E., Salmon, P. M., Sinclair, M., Summala, H., Zakowska, L., & Liberman, G. (2019). Expert evalua-tion of traffic signs: conventional vs. al-ternative designs. Ergonomics, 62(6), 734–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1567829
Berrio, S., Barrero, L. H., Zambrano, L., & Pa-padimitriou, E. (2022). Ergonomic factors affecting comprehension levels of traffic signs: A critical review. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.08.004
Brucal, D. M., Canuto, A. D., & Garcia, C. T. (2013). A study on the design of the Phil-ippine regulatory road signs based on drivers characteristics ergonomic designs based on drivers characteristics, ergo-nomic design principles and comprehen-sion. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/11008
Charlton, S. G. (2006). Conspicuity, memorabil-ity, comprehension, and priming in road hazard warning signs. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(3), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.007
Choocharukul, K., & Sriroongvikrai, K. (2017). Road safety awareness and comprehen-sion of road signs from international tourist's perspectives: a case study of Thailand. Transportation research pro-cedia, 25, 4518-4528.
Dyah Utari, W., Suhardi, B., & Susanto, N. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Ergonomic Traffic Sign Comprehen-sion. Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Technology Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Technol-ogy, 6(1), 2313–7410. https://ajssmt.com/Papers/61116122.pdf
Fernandez, J. J., Paringit, M. C., Salvador, J. R., Lucero, P. I., & Galupino, J. G. (2020). Un-derstanding of traffic signs by drivers in the city of Manila, Philippines. Transpor-tation Research Procedia, 48, 3037–3048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.183
Job, R., Job, Bin-Sallik, M., Job, R. F. S., Job, & National Road Safety Council. (2013). In-digenous road safety in Australia and the “Drivesafe NT Remote” project. In Transport and Road Safety, University of NSW & (Former) National Road Safety Council, Journal of the Australasian Col-lege of Road Safety (Vol. 24, Issue 2). https://archive.acrs.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Indigenous-road-safety-in-Australia-and-the-drivesafe-NT-Remote-project.pdf?form=MG0AV3
Johansson, G., & Rumar, K. (1966). Drivers and road signs: A preliminary investigation of the capacity of car drivers to get infor-mation from road signs.
Kirmizioglu, E., & Tuydes-Yaman, H. (2012). Comprehensibility of traffic signs among urban drivers in Turkey. Accident; analy-sis and prevention, 45, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.014
Koyuncu, M.A., & Amado, S. (2008). Effects of stimulus type, duration and location on priming of road signs: Implications for driving. Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 108-125.
Kraft, W.H.; Homburger, W.S.; Pline, J.L. Traffic Engineering Handbook, 6th ed.; Institute of Transportation Engineers: Washing-ton, DC, USA, 2009.
Liu, J., Wen, H., Zhu, D., & Kumfer, W. (2019). Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Re-search and Public Health, 16(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010162
Ou, Y., & Liu, Y. (2012). Effects of sign design features and training on comprehension of traffic signs in Taiwanese and Viet-namese user groups. International Jour-nal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 1-7.
Shinar, D., & Vogelzang, M. (2013). Compre-hension of traffic signs with symbolic versus text displays. Transportation Re-search Part F: Traffic Psychology and Be-haviour, 18, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.012
WOGALTER, M. S., SOJOURNER, R. J., & BRELSFORD, J. W. (1997). Comprehen-sion and retention of safety pictorials. Er-gonomics, 40(5), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397188017
Zhang, T., & Chan, A.H. (2013). Traffic Sign Comprehension: a Review of Influential Factors and Future Directions for Re-search.