The Journey of Exceptional Educational Leaders in Higher Education Institutions in Region III
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.02.37Keywords:
Exceptional education leaders, HEIs, Deans, Exceptional leadership, Lived experiencesAbstract
This study concentrated on the journey of exceptional education lead-ers in higher education institutions in Region III. This study used the qualitative descriptive, specifically the case study method. This study described and explored the lived experiences of exceptional education leaders. Case analysis, unstructured interviews and observations were used to gather data from the participants. The participants of the study belonged in late adulthood, female, finished their doctorate degree in education and in other disciplines, holding academic posi-tion of Professor 7 and was previously appointed as College of Educa-tion Dean. The educational background of the participants manifested that they were shaped with the learnings acquired in their academic journey. The knowledge-based, skills and abilities to perform effective-ly in their demanding roles demonstrated that they were capable to handle various responsibilities, and many challenges evolve within their workplace. They were affiliated to various recognized organiza-tion to established network and linkages. In terms of leadership quali-ties, most of them said that they used servant leadership; they were people oriented and innovative. Moreover, most of them stated that the qualities of a good academic leaders were knowledgeable, motivator, responsible and have good relationship with people. The participants had strong interpersonal relationship with their colleagues because they were team players, active listeners and flexible leaders. Moreo-ver, their short- and long-term vision is to sustain and maintain their accreditation status through compliance to the accreditation indica-tors that attest their educational quality in pursuit of academic excel-lence. In terms of best practices in curriculum and instruction, the participants claimed that their curriculum and program of studies meets the requirements and standards of the Commission on Higher Education, Professional Regulations Commission, Professional Organi-zation or Societies and other related agencies which were reflective to national and regional goals, and institutional vision and mission, and provide for the development of
various competencies. Similarly, all participants stated that they ad-here with the National Higher Education Research Agenda and Na-tional Unified Health Research Agenda in the formulation of their In-stitutional Research Agenda which were aligned with priority thrust of regional and national priorities of government agencies and private sectors. All participants stated that they adhere to the importance of extending their services to communities outside their campuses. Spe-cifically, the administration, faculty and students are involved in the identification, planning and implementation of extension programs of the institutions. An office that specifically oversees the operations of the extension services is present in the study, of higher education in-stitutions. These distinct offices ensure that a variety of clientele ben-efit from well designed and disseminated programs owing to the adoption of a system that makes those programs sustainable, were regularly monitored and evaluated. Finally, the participants encoun-tered problems and challenges related to the “knowledge quadrant” such as curriculum and instruction, research, community extension and other administrative support.
Downloads
References
Black, S. (2015). Qualities of Effective Lead-ership in Higher Education. Open Jou nal of Leadership, 4 (2), 54-66. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=57195
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917733847
Gedminiene, M. and Kaminskiene, L. (2016). Educational Leadership in Higher Edu-cation: A Scientific Literature Review. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 21 (3), 93-98. http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2021%20Issue3/Version- 4/O2103049398.pdf
Holloway, I., Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and co-herence. Qualitative Research, 3, 345–357. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917733847
Kezar, A. & Holcombe, E.M. (2017). Shared Leadership in Higher Education: Im-portant Lessons from Research and Prac-tice. Retrieved from: https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Shared- Leadership-in-Higher-Education.pdf
Sharma, S., Amir, S. & Kannan, J. (2016). Lead-ership Behavior of Deans and Its Impact on Effectiveness for Quality in A High Ranking University. Ted EĞİtİm Ve Bİlİm, 41 (184).
Shibru, S. (2017). Middle Level Managers’ Quality of Leadership and Good Govern-ance, and Organizational Performance of Wolaita Sodo University. Journal of Edu-cation and Practice, 8, 55-62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














