Main Article Content
Abstract
eading ability is a critical component of learners’ overall academic success. The effective and efficient utilization of resources is critical, especially in the new normal of education. Hence, the researchers, even in the required intervention for early-grade learners, attempted to formulate a scheme to promote better reading profiles with due consideration to school resources. Reading interventions, such as Reading Recovery, utilize one-on-one tutoring to cater to learners’ specific reading needs by evaluating reading interventions for cost and effectiveness in the specific reading skills of phonemic aware-ness, fluency, and text vocabulary, may improve their evidence-based decision-making when it comes to selecting an intervention. The researchers utilized a quasi-experimental design and purposive sampling where the whole population of interest is studied to de-termine the effectiveness of the cost-effective reading intervention A multitude of research has proven that repeated reading is an effec-tive strategy to improve fluency in struggling readers. The instru-ments employed in this study were the Early Grade Reading As-sessment tool for the pretest and the teacher-made equivalent test for EGRA for the post-test. There were 277 males and 268 females with a total of 545 grade 1-3 pupils as participants. Paired Samples T- Test utilized in the study and the results showed scores were all .000 which was less than 0.01 level of significance. Therefore, there were significant differences between the percentage scores of the pretests and the percentage scores of the post-tests. The negative sign of t- t-values indicates that the percentage scores of the post-tests were higher than the percentage scores of the pretests. Thus, the null hypothesis of no significant difference was rejected. Based on the result of this study, it can be inferred and concluded that early reading intervention in improving the learners' reading performance in terms of phonemic awareness, fluency, and text vocabulary is highly effective.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Auld, S. (n.d). Australian Christian College. Re-trieved from Australian Christian College: https://www.acc.edu.au/
Baker, L., & Scher, D. (2002). Beginning read-ers’ motivation for reading in relation to parental belief and home reading experi-ences. Reading psychology, 23(4), 239-269.
Barwasser, A., Lenz, B., & Grünke, M. (2021). A Multimodal Storytelling Intervention for Improving the Reading and Vocabulary Skills of Struggling German-as-a-Second-Language Adolescents with Learning and Behavioral Problems. A Multimodal Sto-rytelling Intervention for Improving the Reading and Vocabulary Skills of Strug-gling German-as-a-Second-Language Ad-olescents with Learning and Behavioral Problems, 29-51.
Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Murray, M. S., Munger, K. A., & Vaughn, M. G. (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there ef-fects a decade later?. Journal of educa-tional psychology, 106(1), 46.
Chen, A.-H., Buari, N. H., & Jufri, S. (2017). The Development of SAH Reading Passage Compendium: A Tool for the Assessment of Reading Performance Related to Visual Function. Malaysia: Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Children’s Bureau. (2017, March 03). The Im-portance Of Reading to your Children. Re-trieved from children’sbureau: https://www.all4kids.org/
Desjardins, R., Thorn, W., Schleicher, A., Quintini, G., Pellizzari, M., Kis, V., & Chung, J. E. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills.
Garnes, D. C., & Wichowski, C. P. (2004). Facili-tator guidebooks for reading strategy workshops in: reciprocal teaching, scaf-folding, journaling. Philadelphia, PA: The Temple University Center for Development in Career and Technical Education.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children's reading comprehension difficulties: Na-ture, causes, and treatments. Current Di-rections in Psychological Science, 20(3), 139-142.
Hurry, J. Fridkin L., Holliman A. (2021). Read-ing Intervention at age 6: Long-term ef-fects of Reading Recovery in the UK on qualifications and support at age 6 (https://bera-jour-nals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.3752).
Maletic, V., Robinson, M., Oakes, T., Iyengar, S., Ball, S. G., & Russell, J. (2007). Neurobiol-ogy of depression: an integrated view of key findings. International journal of clin-ical practice, 61(12), 2030-2040.
Murphy, K. A., Justice, L. M., O'Connell, A. A., Pentimonti, J. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2016). Understanding risk for reading difficulties in children with language im-pairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(6), 1436-1447.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the sci-entific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Insti-tute of Child Health and Human Devel-opment, National Institutes of Health.
Organisation for Economic. (2021). Reading performance (PISA). Brazil: OECDiLi-brary.
Pawliszyn, J. (2012). Comprehensive sampling and sample preparation: analytical tech-niques for scientists. Academic Press.
Pitcher, S. M., Martinez, G., Dicembre, E. A., Fewster, D., & McCormick, M. K. (2010). The literacy needs of adolescents in their own words. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(8), 636-645.
Schwartz, R. M., Hobsbaum, A., Briggs, C., & Scull, J. (2009). Reading Recovery and Evidence‐based Practice: A response to Reynolds and Wheldall. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56(1), 5-15.
Smith, B. (2015). A Case Study of the Impact of Reading Intervention in Early Elementary School Grade Levels (https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1146&context=education_etd)
Snow, C., & Biancarosa, G. (2003). Adolescent literacy and the achievement gap: What do we know and where do we go from here? (pp. 1-36). New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treat-ment resisters. Learning disabilities re-search & practice, 15(1), 55-64.
Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Kuhn, M., ... & Schwanen-flugel, P. (2010). The relationship be-tween different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence dif-ferent oral reading fluency difficulties.