Main Article Content

Abstract

Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 1 of 2020 was issued as a guideline for judges in determining the punishment of perpetrators of corruption crimes. This guideline aims to create legal certainty, pro-portionality, and consistency in the imposition of criminal sanctions in order to achieve substantive justice. This study analyzes the extent to which the application of the Perma has reflected the principle of justice, both from the perspective of criminal law and restorative jus-tice. Using juridical-normative methods and a case comparison ap-proach, this study finds that the implementation of Perma No. 1 of 2020 still faces challenges in judicial practice, especially in adjusting to the elements of state losses and the level of guilt of the defendants. The problem that will be discussed in this study is how urgent is the evaluation of Perma No. 1 of 2020 concerning guidelines for criminal-izing corruption crimes from a justice perspective. The research method used is a normative research method with a statute ap-proach, case approach, and theoretical approach, and analyzed using content analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yoga, Y. W., & Dinata, M. R. K. (2025). Analysis of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 Concerning Guidelines for The Criminalization of Corruption Crimes in the Perspective of Justice. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(3), 993-1000. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.03.01

References

Al Kautsar, I., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Lawrence M. Friedman's modern legal system: Legal culture and societal chang-es from industrial to digital. Sapientia et Virtus, 7(2), 84–99.
Armansyah, A., Alfatih, T. M., & Fadhil, M. A. (2023). Problems and handling of corrup-tion in Indonesia. Scientific Journal of Ed-ucational Vehicles, 9(21), 892–910.
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2018). Legal principles in the legal system. Kertha Wicaksana, 12(2), 145–155.
Bima, M. R., Kamal, M., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Training and counseling on the manage-ment of village fund allocation (ADD). Journal of Innovation as a Result of Com-munity Service (JIPEMAS, 3(1), 63–77.
DP, S. H. (2018). The implementation of condi-tional sentences in the penal system in Indonesia. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review, 4(1), 2–10.
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualism of normative & empirical legal research. Student Library.
Friedman, L. M. (2019). Legal system: A social science perspective. Nusamedia.
Irmawanti, N. D., & Arief, B. N. (2021). The ur-gency of criminal goals and guidelines in the context of reforming the criminal law criminal system. Indonesian Journal of Legal Development, 3(2), 217–227.
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Legal research. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muallifin, M. D. A. (2015). Problems and eradi-cation of corruption in Indonesia. Ahkam: Journal of Islamic Law, 3(2), 311–325.
Muhamad, W. M. N., et al. (2023). The problem of asset recovery in corruption crimes in Indonesia. Publisher Adab.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Law and legal re-search. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nurhardianto, F. (2015). Indonesia's legal sys-tem and legal position. Journal of Filter-ing: Journal of Islamic Political Aspiration Binoculars, 11(1), 33–44.
Samosir, C. D. (1992). The function of prison in the penal system in Indonesia. Creation.
Soetrisno. (1978). Research methodology. UGM.
Sulaiman, E. (2016). The problem of law en-forcement in Indonesia. Ash-Shahabah: Journal of Islamic Education and Studies, 2(1), 63–77.
Wardani, K. A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). The policy of formulating the death pen-alty law against the perpetrators of cor-ruption crimes in Indonesia. Khaira Um-mah Law Journal, 12(4), 951–958.
Zulfa, E. A. (2006). The shift in the criminal paradigm in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Development, 36(3), 1–12.
Compass. (2024, December 31). The National Police is investigating 1,280 corruption cases in 2024, 830 people are suspects. Compass. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/12/31/15530711/polri-mengusut-1280-kasus-korupsi-pada-2024-830-orang-jadi-tersang-ka?utm_source=chatgpt.com#google_vignette
Metro TV News. (2024, February 14). Throughout 2024, the KPK will handle 93 corruption cases. Metrotvnews. https://www.metrotvnews.com/play/kqYCxaG8-sepanjang-2024-kpk-tangani-93-kasus-korupsi
Kusuma, N. J., Firganefi, F., & Farid, M. (2021). The Relevance of Supreme Court Regula-tion No. 1 of 2020 in Efforts of State Losses Refund through Restorative Jus-tice. Corruptio, 2(2), 137-146.
Ali, M., Muliyono, A., & Nurhidayat, S. (2023). The application of a human rights ap-proach toward crimes of corruption: ana-lyzing anti-corruption regulations and ju-dicial decisions. Laws, 12(4), 68.
Siburian, H. K., Nugroho, E. S. N., Manullang, S. O., & Sipayung, B. (2023). Comparative analysis of corruption criminal regula-tions between the New Criminal Law and the Corruption Act. Awang Long Law Re-view, 5(2), 535-544.
Maggio, P. (2021). A critical analysis of corrup-tion and anti-corruption policies in Ita-ly. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 513-530.