Main Article Content


This study aimed to determine the level of implementation and awareness of the juvenile restorative justice program in Tangub City during calendar year 2018-2019. This study made use of non-experimental quantitative research design utilizing descriptive, frequency count, percentage and mean. On the level of implementation of the program, the community respondents exhibited low level of response while the Philippine National Police and the CSWD exhibited a high level of responses. On the level of awareness, the respondents also exhibited a high level of response. It is recommended that the implementers may include or emphasize the community's active participation in juvenile restorative programs. This will encourage them to get involved and recognize the importance of their engagement, maybe resulting in fewer minor-related offenses. The implementers may look into the process on the way the programs are implemented. This will encourage them to examine probable flaws in the execution of the juvenile restorative justice program in order to make adjustments to the overall process of implementation, which could lead to the program's overall success. The implementers may consider looking into the victim's need for reformation and rehabilitation, as well as their family's general engagement. This is critical to ensure that the victims and their families believe the government is on their side, because if the implementers neglect this, retaliation may ensue. Further studies are warranted.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anas, J. L., Pallega, R. B., & Bandigan, E. Y. (2022). Restorative Juvenile Justice: Level of Implementation and Level of Awareness among Residents in Tangub City. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(6), 1028-1042.


Antolo, V., & Perez, T., (2018) RA 9344-The Juvenile Jus-tice and Welfare Act of 2006: A Case Study on its Implementation in Bacolod City. Retrieved from (accessed 20 August 2020)
Bilog, F., (2014). Implementation of the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (RA 9344): Inputs to Poli-cy Amendments. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisci-plinary Research
Bradford, B., (2011). Voice Neutrality and Respect: Use of Victim Support Services, Procedural
Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime (2011). Restorative Justice in Canada: What Victims Should Know. Retrieved from
Collins, J. (2016). How Can More Victims Access Restora-tive Justice? [Web log post]. Retrieved from
Daigle, L., & Muftic, L. (2016). Victimology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Delos Santos, M., Padawil, A., Vedana, M.C., (2016). Ju-venile Justice and Welfare Law Implementation: the Philippine Urban Poor City Case. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS)
Eastwood, A. (2016). Widening the Circle: An Explora-tion of the Challenges and Opportunities for Re-storative Justice in British Columbia (Bachelor’s thesis). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University
Fairness and Confidence in the Criminal Justice System, 11.4 CRIMINOLOGY & CRIM. J. 345.
Flores, A.N., & Dilim, J. (2018). Various Sectors Gather to Promote Juvenile Justice Welfare Act. Retrieved from (ac-cessed 20 August 2020)
Fox., K. J. (2014). Restoring the Social: Offender Reinte-gration in a Risky World. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 38(3), 235-256, doi: 10.1080/01924036.2013.848221
Garcia, R., (2011). Philippine Juvenile Justice Welfare Bill (RA 9344) is not being implemented. Retrieved from (accessed 20 August 2020)
Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kirby, A. & Jacobson, J. (2015) Evaluation of the Pre-Sentence RJ Pathfinder. Available at: report_nov15.pdf (Ac-cessed 21 July 2016)
Laxminarayan, M., & Wolthuis, A. (2015). Accessibility of Restorative Justice: Attitudes as Barriers to Great-er Referrals. Social Work Review, 14(4), 35-45. Re-trieved from
Lokanan, M. (2009). An Open Model for Restorative Jus-tice: Is there Room for Punishment? Contemporary Justice Review, 12(3), 289-307. doi:10.1080/10282580903105806
Meadows, A., et al., (2012) Evaluation of the South York-shire Restorative Justice Programmed, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University
Parsons, J., & Bergin, T., (2010). The Impact of Criminal Justice Involvement on Victims ‘Mental Health. 23.2 J. OF TRAUMATIC STRESS 182.

Plecas, D. (2014). Getting Serious About Crime Reduc-tion: Restorative Justice Council. (2015). New Poll-ing Demonstrates Overwhelming Support for Re-storative Justice. Retrieved from (Office for National Statistics)
Strang, H., et al., (2013). Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face-to-Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration
Tamarit, J. Villacampa, C. & Filella, G. , (2010). Secondary Victimization and Victim Assistance. 18 EUR. J. OF CRIME, CRIM. L. & CRIM. JUST., 281.
Tomporowski, B., Buck, M., Bagen, C., & Binder, V. (2011). Reflections on the Past, Present, and Fu-ture of Restorative Justice in Canada. Alberta Law Review, 48(4), 815-829. Retrieved from
Van Camp, T. & Wemmers J. A., (2016) Victims’ Reflec-tions on the Protective and Proactive Approaches to the Offer of Restorative Justice: The Importance of Information Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 58 (3), 416-442
Wigzell, A. & Hough, M. (2015) The NOMS RJ Capacity Building Programmed. A study of the quality of participant and implementation experiences, Lon-don: Institute for Criminal Policy Research, Birk-beck University of London
Yang, S.X., (2015). Evaluation of the Intervention and Rehabilitation Program in Residential Facilities and Diversion Programs for Children in Conflict with the Law. Retrieved from (accessed 20 August 2020)