##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Sep 12, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1147 Download : 440

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Advertisements have been an effective tool used to promote a product or service. It can also be considered as a way to shape the mind and the culture of society. Hence, this study determined the linguistic elements and analyzed different types of sexism through language in Philippine television advertisements. The study used qualitative approach to research and utilized a validated self-made research instrument which served as the primary tool of the study. The study identified the linguistic elements present in Philippine television advertisements in terms of its lexical and syntactical feature and analyzed the types of sexism through language in Philippine advertisements. The study revealed that the commonly used lexical feature of advertisements is simple vocabulary; meanwhile for syntactic feature, the most common is ambiguity and the use of imperative. It is also found that advertisements can be used as a sexism platform in the Philippines. Moreover, the way these elements are used or depicted along with the portrayal of men and women in the advertisements may influence the audience’s perception and understanding of what they have seen thus, the audio-video material as output of this study may serve as a tool to liberate the minds of the viewing public.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sales, A. J. G., Leuterio, G. D., Lopez, L. J. S., Matinao, C. D. G., Naces, L. C., & Ramos, A. L. (2022). Advertisements and Sexism in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(9), 1664-1672. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.09.07

References

Andersson, H and Schytt, E. (2017). Sexism in Advertis-ing: A Qualitative Study of the Influence on Con-sumer Attitudes Towards Companies. Jonkoping University.
Bates, L. (2016). Mansplaining: How Not to Talk to Fe-male NASA Astronauts. The Guardian.
Baquillas, J. (2018). Buying Local or Foreign Brands. Does Consumer Ethnocentrism affect Purchase In-tention? DBA Students, De La Salle Univeristy.
Barbu-Kleitsh, O. (2015). Use of Visual Hyperbole in Advertising Effectiveness.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Chafai, H. (2010). Gender and the Language of Advertis-ing: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Women’s Repre-sentation in British and Moroccan Magazine Ad-vertisements. Radbound University.
Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication Inc.
Grey, D. (2008). Language in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanaysha, J. (2016). The Importance of Social Media Advertisements in Enhancing Brand Equity: A Study on Fast Food Restaurant Industry in Malay-sia. International Journal of Innovation, Manage-ment and Technology.
Joyce, B. J., Huma, B., Ristimaki, H. L., Almeida, F. and Doehring, A. (2021). Speaking Out against Everday Sexism: Gender and Epistemics in Accusations of “Mansplaining.” U.K. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520979499
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Mastari, L., Spruyt, B., and Siongers, J., (2019). Benevo-lent and Hostile Sexism in Social Spheres: The Im-pact of Parents, School and Romance on Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Attitudes. Front. Sociol. 4:47.
Melynda, M. J. L. (2017). The Analysis of the Language Style Used in Maybeline New York’s Written Ad-vertisements. Sanata Dharma University.
Nordquist, R. (2019). Language and Gender Studies. Thought Co. https://www.thoughtco.com/language-and-gender-studies-1691095
Permatasari S. N. and Yulia, M. F. (2013). An Analysis on the Language Style of the Utterances in Magnum Advertisements. Sanata Dharma University.
Prieler, M. and Centeno, D. (2013). Gender Representa-tion in Philippine Television Advertisements. Sex Roles 69, 276-288.
Samarina, V.V. and Poliakova, T. V. (2018). Linguistic Representation of Gender Stereotypes in English Advertising Texts. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, VI(47), Issue: 160, 201.
Shah, M. (2020). Traditional Media vs. New Media: Which is Beneficial. Tech Funnel.
Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative Research. A Personal Skills Aproach. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.
Sheehan, K. (2004). Controversies in Contemporary Ad-vertising. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Suharyanto, A. and Hidayat, T. (2018). Revealing Me-dan’s Chinese Ethnic Identity in Advertising Grief at HarianAnalisa Newspaper. Budapest Interna-tional Research and Critics Institute-Journal.
Tesseras, L. (2021). Sneaky Sexism is on the Rise in Ad-vertising. Marketing Week.
The Philippines in Brief. (n.d). Nations Online. https://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/philippines.htm
Xia, X. (2013). Gender Differences in Using Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Acade-my Publisher.