##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Oct 18, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 289 Download : 214

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of hexagon fraud (stimulus, opportunity, rationalization, capability, ego, and collusion) in detecting financial statement fraud. The dependent variable used in this study is financial statement fraud as proxied by earning management, while the independent variables are financial target, financial stability, change in directors, ineffective monitoring, change in auditors, frequent number of CEO's picture, and political connection. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial reports and annual reports. The population in this study is the financial sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2021 as many as 89 companies. The sampling technique used purposive sampling method with a sample of 19 companies. The data analysis technique uses panel data regression analysis which is processed using the Eviews 12 program. The results of this study indicate that simultaneously financial targets, financial stability, change in directors, ineffective monitoring, change in auditors, frequent number of CEO's picture, and political connection have an effect on detecting financial statement fraud. Furthermore, partially financial targets and financial stability have a positive effect in detecting financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, change in director, ineffective monitoring, change in auditor, frequent number of CEO's picture, and political connection have no effect in detecting financial statement fraud.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Julia, J., & Yunita, A. (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud in Detecting Fraud Financial Statements (Empirical Study on Financial Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2021). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(10), 2112-2124. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.10.23

References

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Indonesia Fraud Survey 2019.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2020). Report to the Nations 2020 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and abuse.
Ghozali, Priest. (2020). 25 Grand theory Theory Big Knowledge management, Accountancy, and Busi-ness (For Theoretical Foundation Thesis, Thesis, and Dissertation). Semarang: Yoga Primary.
Handoko, Bambang Leo. (2021). “Hexagon Fraud in De-tecting Fraud Financial Statements Company Bank-ing in Indonesia". Journal Study Accounting. Vol. 5 No. 2, 176-192, 2021.
Henry., Kitty. (2022). "Determinant Factors of Earnings Management with Company Size as Moderating Variable". MEA Scientific Journal (Management, Economics, and Accounting). Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022.
Jannah, VM, et.al. (2021). "The Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model Approach in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting". Indonesian Accounting and Finance Studies. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021.
Karpoff, Jonathan M. (2020). "The Future of Financial Fraud". Journal of Corporate Finance . Vol 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101694.
Mukaromah, I., Budiwitjaksono, GS (2021). “Fraud Hex-agon Theory in Detecting Fraudulent Financial Statements in Banks Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019”. Scientific Journal of Com-puterized Accounting. Vol. 14, No. 1, 61-72, July 2021.
Nadziliyah, H., Primasari NS (2022). "Analysis Fraud Hex-agon to Financial Fraud Statement on Company Sector Infrastructure, Utilities and Transportation". Accounting and Finance Studies. Vol. 2, No. 1, 21-39, 2022. DOI: 10.47153/afs21.2702022.
Octani, J., et al. (2021). "Analysis of the Influence of Hex-agon Fraud on Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Financial Sector Companies Listed on the Indone-sia Stock Exchange During 2017-2020". JABEI. Vol. 1, No. 1, 36-49, 2021.
Owusu, GMY, et.al. (2021). "Examination" the Predictors of Fraud in State-Owned Enterprises: An Applica-tion of the Fraud Triangle Theory. Journal of Mon-ey Laundering Control. DOI: 10.1108/JMLC-05-2021-0053.
Sagala, SG, Siagian, V. (2021). “Effect of Fraud Hexagon Model on Fraudulent Reports Finance on Company Sub Sector Food and Drink which Registered in BEI Year 2016-2019". Journal Accounting. Vol. 13, No. 2, 245-259, November 2021.
Siddiq, FR, Suseno, AE (2019). “Fraud Pentagon Theory in Financial Statement Fraud on Company Regis-tered in Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) Period 2014-2017 (F-Score Model Perspective)”. Nusamba Journal. Vol. 4, No. 2, October 2019. DOI: https://DOI10.29407/nusamba.v4i2.13800.
Utami, ER, Pusparini, NO (2019). “The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia (Empirical Study of Listed Banking Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2017)”. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Vol. 102.
Vousinas, Georgios L. (2019). “Advancing theory of Fraud: The SCORE Model". Journal of Financial Crime. Vol. 26, Issue: 1, 372-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
Yanti, DD, Munari. (2021). "Pentagon Fraud Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Statements in the Manufac-turing Company Sector". Acquisition of Accounting Journal. Vol. 17, 01, 31-46, 2021