Main Article Content


The main purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship of school heads’ transformational leadership and school performance among public elementary school in the City Schools Division of San Fernando, La Union. Descriptive-correlational design was used which consists of 27 elementary schools with twenty-seven (27) school heads and four hundred forty-three (443) teachers who were in active service for the School Year 2021-2022 were the respondents of the study. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, Rank-biserial and Spearman’s rank, Pearson product-moment correlation were the tools used in the study and all analyses were tested at 0.05 level of significance using IBM SPSS. The professional characteristics of the school heads showed that majority of them are occupying a plantilla item of Principal 1 and 2 and are still taking their doctorate degree. Also, most of them served for 10 years and above as school heads and they are managing non-central and medium-sized schools. The practice of transformational leadership among the school heads is generally high and the ratings of the school heads across all the dimensions of transformational leadership are consistent. Majority of the school head in the Division of La Union have Maturing or level 2 SBM practice. The schools have introduced and sustained continuous improvement process that integrates wider community participation and improve significantly the students’ performance and learning outcomes. The test of hypothesis showed that there were no significant differences between school heads and teachers’ ratings of the former’s transformational leadership except for the domains “enabling others to act” and “encouraging the heart”. The school type had a significant relationship with the domain “enabling the heart”. Specifically, those who are managing non-central school had significantly lower scores in encouraging the heart compared to those who are managing the central schools. Other profile variables are not significantly related to transformational leadership. Finally, there was a significant positive correlation between the overall transformational leadership and the schools’ performance. The more school heads practice transformational leadership particularly “Inspiring a shared vision” and “Encouraging the heart”, the higher is the schools’ performance. In conclusion, the elementary schools in the Division of La Union City are compliant to DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2012. However, much is desired to elevate its compliance to advanced stage. Significantly, the high practice of transformational leadership and this is translated in the school improvement and performance marked by the introduction and sustained process of stakeholders’ participation and significant students’ learning outcomes. Remarkably, higher practice of transformational leadership among school heads yields higher school performance particularly along Inspiring a shared vision and Encouraging the heart. Thus, transformational leadership is an effective leadership approach in managing DepEd schools as it ushers significant changes in the development of schools and its stakeholders.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dacpano, E. B. (2022). The Influence of School Heads’ Transformational Leadership on Schools’ Performance: The Case of City Schools Division of San Fernando, La Union. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(9), 1717-1736.


Aruzie, R.S. et. Al. (2018). The Impact of Leadership Styles On Teaching An LearningOutcomes: A Case Study of Selected Senior High Schools In The Nkronza Districtsof BrongAhafo Region In Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research and-Management. Vol. 6 No. 12
Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teachers' organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 806-811. Retrieved from Academic Search Com-plete. (Accession No. 87343949)
Baptiste, M. (2019). No teacher left behind: The impact of principal leadership styles on teacher job satis-faction and student success. Journal of Interna-tional Education and Leadership, 9(1). Retrieved from
Bass, B.M. (2019). Two decades of research and devel-opment in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. (2016). The effects of in-tegrated transformational leadership on achieve-ment. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 357- 374. doi:10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0086
Buenvinida, Lerma (2019). Transformational Leadership Practices of School Heads and Performance of City Schools in the Division Office of the first District Of Laguna, Philippines. PEOPLE: International Jour-nal of Social Sciences ISSN 2454-5899. Volume 4 Issue 3, pp.799-812.
Bunaiyan, W. and McWilliams, K. (2018). A Review of the Literature on Transformational Leadership. Inter-national Journal of Education, Learning and De-velopment. Vol.6, No.1, pp.1-5.
Caldwell, B. J. (2014). Autonomy and Self-Management: Concepts and Evidence.
Carless, S. A. (2018). Gender differences in transforma-tional leadership: An examination of superior, leader and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles, 39(11-12), 887–902.
Chen, P., Lee, C., Lin, H., & Zhang, C. (2016). Factors that develop effective professional learning communi-ties in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 248-265. doi:10.1080/02188791.2016.1148853
DepEd (2009). A manual on the assessment of school-based management practices, Pasig
DepEd (2010). DepEd to Strengthen SBM in Schools, Pasig, accessed/2010/11/23
DepEd (2012). Implementing guidelines on the revised school-based management (SBM), framework, as-sessment process and tool (APAT), DepEd Order No. 83
Department of Education. (2006). Basic education sector reform agenda (2006-2010). National Education for All Committee (NEC).
Department of Education. (2010). School-based man-agement: a manual in the assessment of school-based management practices. Pasig City: Technical Working Group, Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA).
Effiyanti, E. Lubis, A R., Sofyan, S., Syafruddin, S. (2020). Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business Vol 8 No 2 (2021) 0583–0593. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0583
Finnigan, K., & Stewart, T. (2019). Leading change under pressure: An examination of principal leadership in low-performing schools. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 586-618.
Finnigan, K. S. (2012). Principal leadership in low-performing schools: A closer look through the eyes of teachers. Education & Urban Society, 44(2), 183-202. doi:10.1177/0013124511431570
Fuhrmann, T. D. (2016). Motivating Employees. Advanc-es in Diary Technology, 1(8), 67 – 84
Gray, D., & Lewis, J. (2013). Lessons learned in preparing principals to become instructional leaders. Inter-national Journal of Educational Leadership Prepa-ration, 8(1), 140-143. Retrieved from Education Source. (Accession No. 94256122
Jacobson, S., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2015). Successful leadership in challenging US schools: enabling principles, enabling schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607-618.
Kouzes J. (2009), The Leadership Challenge (the fourth edition), Electronic Industry Press, Beijing, pp.100
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2015). The leadership chal-lenge: how to keep getting extraordinary things done in organizations. California: Jossey- Bass.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. J. (2019). Leadership chal-lenge (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2015). A review of transfor-mational school leadership research 1996–2015. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2019). The effects of trans-formational leadership on organizational condi-tions and student engagement with school. Jour-nal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129. doi:10.1108/ 0957823001032006
Luthans, K. W. (2015). Recognition: A Powerful, but of-ten Overlooked, Leadership Tool to Improve Em-ployee Performance. Journal of Leadership & Or-ganizational Studies
Makgato, M., & Mudzanani, N. (2019). Exploring school principals’ leadership styles and learners’ educa-tional performance: A perspective from high- and lowperforming schools, Africa Education Review, 16(2), 90-108, doi:10.1080/18146627.2017.1411201
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Mora-Whitehurst, R. (2013). The relationship between elementary principals’ visionary leadership and students’ reading performance. Educational Fo-rum, 77(3), 315- 328. doi:10.1080/00131725.2013.792897
Mora, C. (2012). Transformational Leadership in Educa-tion: Concept Analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 8(Special Issue), 184-192.
Mulford, B., Kendall, D., Ewington, J., Edmunds, B., Ken-dall, L., & Silins, H. (2008). Successful principal-ship of high-performance schools in high-poverty communities. Journal of Educational Administra-tion, 46(4), 461-480.
Murakami-Ramalho, E., Garza, E., & Merchant, B. (2010). Successful school leadership in socio-economically challenging contexts: School princi-pals creating and sustaining successful school im-provement. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(3), 35-55
Northouse, P.G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Pan, H., Nyeu, F., & Cheng, S. (2017). Leading school for learning: Principal behaviors in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2), 168-185. doi:10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0069
Parrish, D. A. (2011). The Impact of leadership behavior on organizational commitment and job autonomy of information services librarians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
Petingco, M. (2009). School-based management practic-es and teaching performance in Central Elemen-tary Schools in the Cotabato Division, Notre Dame University, Cotabato City, Philippines
Pietsch, M., & Tulowitzki, P. (2017). Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional behaviors – an empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improve-ment, 28(4), 629-649, doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1363787
Republic Act No. 9155. Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Judge, K. (2015). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educa-tional administration quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Sammons, P., Davis, S., Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Using mixed methods to investigate school improve-ment and the role of leadership: An example of a longitudinal study in England. Journal of Educa-tional Administration, 52(5), 565-589. doi:10.1108/JEA-10-2013-0121
Sergiovanni, J. (2017). The principalship, a reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Stewart, J. (2016). Transformational leadership: An evolving concept examined through the works of Burns, Bass, Avolio, and Leithwood. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 54, 1-25.
Sun, R., & Henderson, A. C. (2017). Transformational leadership and organizational processes: Influenc-ing public performance. Public Administration Re-view, 77(4), 554-565. doi:10.1111/puar.12654
Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Lead-ership & Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418-451. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.681001
Tobin, J. (2014). Management and leadership issues for school building leaders. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(1), 1-14. Retrieved from ERIC. (Accession No. EJ1024110)
Trmal, S.A., Bustamam, U.S.A., & Mohamed, Z.A. (2015). The effect of transformational leadership in achieving high performance workforce that ex-ceeds organisational expectation: A study from a global and Islamic perspective. Global Business and Management Research, 7(2), 88-94
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Admin-istration, 53(1), 66-92. doi:10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0024
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Tschannenen-Moran, B. (2011). Taking a strengths-based focus improves climate. Journal of School Leadership, 21(3), 422-448
Our World (2019): 2030 agenda for Sustainable Devel-opment Goals (SDGs). 21252030 Agenda for Sus-tainable Development web.pdf (
Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Relating school lead-ership to perceived professional learning commu-nity characteristics: A multilevel analysis. Teach-ing and Teacher Education, 57, 26-38. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.003
Waite, D. (2014). Imperial hubris: The dark heart of leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 24(6), 1202-1232. Retrieved from Expanded Academic ASAP. (Accession No. edsgcl.424532396)
Woods, E. H., & Martin, B. (2016). What leadership be-haviors were demonstrated by the principal in a high poverty, high achieving elementary school? Cogent Education, 3(1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1172935
Yoon, S. (2016). Principals’ data-driven practice and its influences on teacher buy-in and student achievement in comprehensive school reform models. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(4), 500-523. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1181187
Young, M., Winn, K., & Reedy, M. (2017). The every stu-dent succeeds act: Strengthening the focus on ed-ucational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 705-726. doi:10.1177/0013161X17735871