##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
Main Article Content
Abstract
The goal of this study is to determine the level of primary mathematics school teacher’s Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and the achievement of learners of the selected districts of the Division of Butuan City, Agusan del Norte. The participating teachers were able to complete the survey on the following components namely, technology knowledge, content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, technological pedagogical knowledge, technology and pedagogy and content knowledge, and the mathematics achievement level of learners. This study employed descriptive – correlational design to describe the variables and the relationship among them. The results revealed that teachers have high knowledge on the seven components of TPACK and obtained highest average on the technological pedagogical knowledge directly proportional with the mathematics achievement level of the learners. Though teachers showcasing their mastery level of teaching, still they need the support of technology to address the immediate concerns in dealing with the new normal. Thus, teachers may be encouraged to attend conferences, seminar – workshops, and training related to technology specifically training on technology applications that promotes easy techniques in solving word problems in primary grade mathematics.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Casinillo, L. F. (2019). Factors affecting the failure rate in mathematics: the case of Visayas State University (VSU). Review of Socio-Economic Research and Development Studies, 3(1), 1-18.
Casinillo, L. F., Camulte, M. C. G., Raagas, D. L. & Riña, T. S. (2020). Cultural factors in learning mathemat-ics: the case on achievement level among Badjao students. International Journal of Indonesian Edu-cation and Teaching, 4(1), 71-81.
Check J., Schutt R. K. Survey research. In: J. Check, R. K. Schutt., editors. Research methods in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2012. pp. 159–185.
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years?.Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508.
Jamon, B. E. V., Boholano, H. B., Cabanes-Jamon, M. G., & Pardillo, M. F. (2021). Teachers lived experiences in the new normal in Philippine public schools: A phenomenology. International Journal of Re-search, 8(02), 773-782.
Lacia, M. (2019). Classroom Practices in Mathematics: Effects on Elementary and Secondary School Students' Achievement in Mathematics in Region XII, Philippines (Doctoral dissertation).
Mutlu, Y. (2019). Math Anxiety in Students with and without Math Learning Difficulties. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 471-475.
Nawaz, A., & Kundi, G. M. (2010). Digital literacy: An analysis of the contemporary paradigms. Interna-tional Journal of Science and Technology Educa-tion Research, 1(2), 19-29.
Ogunleye, B. O. (2019). Effects of concrete-representational-abstract instructional strategy on chemistry performance of students with mathe-matics learning difficulties in Ogun State, Nigeria. KIU Journal of Education, 14(2), 135-151.
Okobia, E. O. (2011). Availability and teachers' use of instructional materials and resources in the im-plementation of social studies in junior secondary schools in Edo State, Nigeria. Rev. Eur. Stud., 3(2), 90-97
Patalinghug, J. S. (2022). Intervention material on com-paring the stages of the life cycle of organisms of the Grade 4 science MELC in the modular distance learning. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Education.
Patalinghug, J. S., & Arnado, A. A. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge and their Capacity for Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Multidiscipli-nary: Applied Business and Education Re-search, 2(7), 574-586. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.07.05
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science & Education.
Raulston, C. G., &Alexiou-Ray, J. (2018).Preparing more technology-literate preservice teachers: A chang-ing paradigm in higher education. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(5), 9-13.
Roble, D. (2014). The Geometer’s Sketchpad: A Techno-logical Tool Enhancing Junior High School Stu-dents’ Mathematics Achievement, Attitude to-wards Mathematics and Technology, American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 4, No.15, Sci-ence and Education Publishing.
Roble, D. B., Ubalde, M. V., & Castillano, E. C. (2020). The Good, Bad and Ugly of Technology Integration in Mathematics from The Lens of Public School Mathematics Teachers.
Schatzki, T. R. (2021). Spatial troubles with teaching under COVID-19. Studies in Continuing Educa-tion. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1928052.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The de-velopment andvalidation of an assessment in-strument for preservice teachers. Journal of Re-search on Technology in Education, 42, 123–149.10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Suarez, M., & Casinillo, L. (2020). Effect of strategic in-tervention material (SIM) on academic perfor-mance: evidence from students of science VI. Review of Socio-Economic Research and Devel-opment Studies, 4(1), 20-32.
Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2017). Exploring Chemistry student teachers’ diagnostic competence – A qualitative cross-level study. Education Sciences, 7(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040086.
UNESCO (2020). Education in a post-Covid world: Nine ideas for public action. Paris: UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/news/education-post-covid-world-nine-ideas-public-action. Ac-cessed 28 June 2021.
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., & Aoyama, K. (2019). Diagnosing Students'
Learning Difficulties in the Eyes of Indonesian Mathe-matics Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Educa-tion, 10(3), 357-364.