Out-of-Field Teaching: Impact on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Motivation

Authors

  • Reynald Alfred A. Recede Senior High School Department Marikina High School Marikina City, The Philippines
  • Rowena A. Asignado Junior High School Department Marikina High School Marikina City, The Philippines
  • Mark A. Castro Senior High School Department Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Marikina Marikina City, The Philip-pines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber..04.02.19

Keywords:

Motivation, Out of field teaching, Teacher training, Self-efficacy

Abstract

he study aimed to determine the impact of having teaching loads assigned to teachers which are not aligned with their preservice training.  The research utilized a descriptive research design and involved 12 senior high school teachers who are teaching in a public national high school in Marikina City, the Philippines for the school year 2019-2020.  The study also made use of the qualitative data gathered through focus group discussion to have an in-depth analysis of the perceptions of the teachers regarding their situation on teaching a subject that is not part of their expertise.  The study revealed that teachers who are assigned teaching loads which are not part of their preservice training showed some confidence that they can teach their students well.  This was shown on the question how confident they were in teaching their students to become critical thinkers and 8 or (66.67 %) of the total number of the teacher participants said that they exerted moderate effort in encouraging students to become critical thinkers.  In addition, 5 or (41.67 %) of the teachers shared that they can do so much to help students improve in his failing grade.  Surprisingly, 7 or (58.33%) of the total number of the teacher participants said that they can only exert moderate effort to help students who are having difficulty with the subject.  Based from the findings of the study, the researchers thought that the perennial problem of teachers being assigned teaching loads that are not in line with their area of expertise should be given enough training and technical assistance coming from the school administration.  This will help improve teachers in their pedagogical techniques and the type of assessment they employ in their classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carson, R. L., & Chase, M. A. (2009). An examination of physical education teacher motivation from a self-determination theoretical framework. Physical Ed-ucation and Sport Pedagogy, 14, 335–353.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408980802301866

Co, A. G., Abella, C. R., & De Jesus, F. (2021). Teaching Outside Specialization from the Perspective of Sci-ence Teachers https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107725

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000) “Teacher Quality and Stu-dent Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evi-dence”, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1) <http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/

Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thorenson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analy-sis, 23 (1) 57-77.

Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do dif-ferent pathways prepare teachers to teach? Jour-nal of Teacher Education, 53 (4), 286-302.

Goldhaber, D., Brewer, D. & Anderson, D. (1999) A three-way error components analysis of educational productivity, Education Economics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 199-208.

Goldhaber, D. & Anthony, E. (2003) “Teacher quality and student achievement”, ERIC Clearinghouse on Ur-ban Education Urban Diversity Series, Retrieved: June 9, 2004.

Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Education-al Research, 81 (1), 41-47.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Lon-don: Routledge

Hawk, P., Coble, C.R. & Swanson, M. (1985) Certification: It does matter, Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 13-15. Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Fac-tors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2013(11), 271–297.

Hobbs, L., & Porsch, R. (2021). Teaching out-of-field: challenges for teacher education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1985280

Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does Teaching Experi-ence Increases Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of the Research. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/does-teaching-experience-increase-teacher-effectiveness-review-research

Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachersí self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Edu-cational Psychology, 102, 741ñ756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237

Özdemir, S. (2000). Eğitimde örgütsel yenileşme (5. bs). Ankara: Pegem A. Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and com-mitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teach-er Education, 36, 79–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971658

Panisoara, I.O., Duta, N., Panisoara, G., & Tomoaica, E. (2014). Teacher Profile in Romania: Defining Fea-tures and Priorities of the Training Programs in Teaching Career. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.441

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Man-agement Review, 14 (3), 361-384.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-17

How to Cite

Recede, R. A. A. ., Asignado, R. A., & Castro, M. A. (2023). Out-of-Field Teaching: Impact on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Motivation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(2), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber..04.02.19