Electronic Strategic Intervention Material (e-SIM) in Grade 7 (Biology): Effects on Students’ Performance

Authors

  • Shirlyn Lorenzana Buitre Graduate School, Marikina Polytechnic College, Marikina City, The Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.15

Keywords:

Electronic strategic intervention material, students’ academic performance,, secondary education

Abstract

As everyone is conforming to living with the pandemic, all offers and possible means in the education sector must be applied to help every learner manage their assignments. To help educators in assisting learners in doing their home works, DepEd Memo No. 177 s. 2005 -Training Workshop on Strategic Interventions for successful learning was created.  This intervention aimed to enhance teachers’ skills in test analysis and interpretation and capacitate them in developing varied intervention materials for remediation and enrichment of knowledge. This training prompted the teachers to develop and use Strategic Intervention Material in teaching their subject areas. This study attempted to determine the effectiveness of electronic strategic intervention material in conducting remedial lessons in Grade 7 Biology in a public national high school, Division of Antipolo City for the school year 2022-2023. This study utilized Quasi-experimental research with Non-print Rating Sheets and pretest and posttest as data gathering instruments. Pretest and posttest were administered to thirty-five (35) Grade 7 students to measure their academic performance before and after the use of the Electronic Strategic Intervention Material. The findings showed that Science experts and teachers evaluated the e-SIM with grand mean ratings of 3.88 and 3.87, respectively, verbally interpreted as Very Satisfactory in terms of content quality, instructional quality, technical quality, and accuracy and up-to-datedness. Results also showed that there is a significant difference between the academic performance of the student respondents on the pretest and posttest after the utilization of e-SIM as revealed by the computed mean scores of 13.37 for the pretest and 34.77 for the posttest.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arpilleda, A. J. (2021). Strategic intervention material: A tool in enhancing grade nine students’ mathematical performance . In-ternational Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(5,), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.5051

Balcoba, J. D. (2019). The Use of Supplemen-tary Materials to Enhance the Students Performance in Grade 7 Biology. A Mas-ter’s Thesis. Marikina Polytechnic Col-lege. Marikina City.

Bebita, D. (2022). Supplementary Instructional Material Via Video Clips SIMVI): Effects on Grade 9 Students’ Conceptual Under-standing and Motivation. A Master’s The-sis. Marikina Polytechnic College. Mariki-na City.

Bonal, X., & González, S. (2020). The impact of lockdown on the learning gap: family and school divisions in times of crisis - Inter-national Review of Education. Spring-erLink. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09860-z

Cancino, V. (2019). Supplemental Activities in Science 10 (Biology). A Master’s Thesis. Marikina Polytechnic College. Marikina City.

Encarnacion, R., Galang, A. A., & Hallar, B. J. (2021). The impact and effectiveness of e-learning on teaching and learning. In-ternational Journal of Computing Scienc-es Research, 5(1), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.47

Gopalan, M. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education re-search: growth, promise, and challenges. American Educational Research Association. Volume 44, Issue Number 1 pages 218-243

Halamish, V. (2018). Can very small font size enhance memory? - Memory & Cognition. SpringerLink. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0816-6

Ihejiamaizu, C. C., & Ochui, I. (2019). Utiliza-tion of modern electronic instructional materials and biology students’ academic achievement in Calabar Education Zone, Cross River State. Global Journal of Edu-cational Research, 18(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v18i2.1

Jonathan, J. (2022). The Top 6 Benefits of In-teractive Learning | Mussila. Mussila. https://mussila.com/the-top-6-benefits-of-interactive-learning/

Karalis, T. (2020). planning and evaluation during educational disruption: lessons learned from covid 19 pandemic for treatment and emergencies in education. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3789022

Maciejewski, M. L. (2020) Quasi-experimental design, Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 4:1, 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1477468

Maloloy-On, M., Arnado, A., Aviles, G., Solania, N., & Ventura, R. (2021). Teacher’s re-sponses on the new normal learning de-livery modalities: prospective lifelong learning pathway. SMCC Higher Educa-tion Research Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.18868/sherj8j.08.010121.02

Menéndez, E. S., & Moya Martinez, M. E. (2019). Problems of learning and peda-gogical intervention | international jour-nal of social sciences and humanities. Problems of learning and pedagogical in-tervention. International Journal of So-cial Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.301

Onyema, M. E., Nwafor, C., Obefemi, F., & Sen, S. (2020). Impact of coronavirus pandem-ic on education vol.11, no.13, Journal of Education and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341787426_Impact_of_Coronavirus_Pandemic_on_Education

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

Buitre, S. L. . (2023). Electronic Strategic Intervention Material (e-SIM) in Grade 7 (Biology): Effects on Students’ Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2751-2764. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.15