##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published
Jul 12, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 712 Download : 373

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to determine the trainings in the teachers’ learning and development for differentiated instruction to enhance the instructional strategies of the elementary school teachers in North Butuan District of the Division of Butuan City, Agusan del Norte. The participating teachers completed the TPACK survey which consisted of the demographic profile of teachers and the TPACK components namely: Technology Knowledge (TK), Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), Technology Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Differentiated Instruction survey instrument about mathematics. In addition, both surveys were analyzed based on how the teachers performed in TPACK and differentiated instruction and percentage of the capacity of teachers based on the two different methods of teaching. Among the four components of TPACK, the technological knowledge, content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge had the highest mean. The level of differentiated instruction of the participants in terms of lesson design and implementation revealed that learning activities are varied got the highest mean. In addition, the differentiated instruction in terms of lesson design and implementation, content, procedures, communication and learning were found to have the highest mean. Teachers teaching elementary mathematics may be requested to attend webinars on TPACK or related seminars/webinars to enhance their knowledge in dealing with the content in mathematics specifically word problems and their concerns on differentiated instruction.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Patalinghug, J. S., & Arnado, A. A. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge and their Capacity for Differentiated Instruction. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(7), 574-586. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.07.05

References

Ahmed, M. S. (2015). Teacher as Facilitator in selected schools of Dhaka city.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 5(3), 235-245.
Blaz, D. (2016). Differentiated Instruction: A Guide for World Language Teachers.
Casey, M. (2011). Perceived efficacy and preparedness of beginning teachers to differentiate instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johnson & Wales.
Doubet, K. J., & Hockett, J. A. (2017). Differentiation in the elementary grades: Strategies to engage and equip all learners.
Felipe, A. (2006) Unexpected learning competencies of Grades 5 and 6 pupils in public elementary schools: A Philippine report. International Education Journal, 7(7), 957-966
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191.
Hewitt, D., & Tarrant, S. (2015). Innovative teaching and learning in primary schools.
Kaur, B., Kwon, O., & Leong, Y. (2017). Professional development of mathematics teachers. Mathematics education—An Asian perspective.
Kini, T., & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness. A Review of the Research, 1-72.
Ling, T. P., Sam, L. C., & Kee, K. L. (2017). Diagnosing primary pupils’learning of the concept of after in the topic time through knowledge states by using cognitive diagnostic assessment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 145-175.
Magayon, V. C., & Tan, E. B. (2016). Learning Mathematics and Differentiated Instruction in the Philippines: A Phenomenographical Study on Struggles and Successes of Grade 7 Students. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(3), 1-14.
Malubay, J., & Daguplo, M. S. (2018). Characterizing Mathematics Teachers’ technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. European Journal of Education Studies.
Millen, R. A., & Gable, R. (2016). New era of teaching, learning, and technology: Teachers’ perceived technological pedagogical content knowledge and self-efficacy towards differentiated instruction. K-12 Education, 34.
Müllerke, N., Duchaine, E. L., Grünke, M., & Karnes, J. (2019). The Effects of a Response Card Intervention on the Active Participation in Math Lessons of Five Seventh Graders with Learning Disabilities. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 16(2), 107-120.
Noreen, R., & Rana, A. M. K. (2019). Activity-Based Teaching versus Traditional Method of Teaching in Mathematics at Elementary Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 145-159.
Ong, P., Liao, V. & Alimon, R. (2009). Moderating Language and Number of Mathematical Operations in the Relationship between Problem Solving Scores and Learning Strategies. TESOL Journal, 1, 58-78, http://www.tesol- journal.com.
Porter, B. E. (2019). Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of Teaching Mathematics, Mathematics Anxiety, and Teaching Mathematics Efficacy.
Rogayan, D. V. Jr. (2019). Biology Learning Station Strategy (BLISS): Its effects on science achievement and attitude towards biology. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 1(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.10
Sangcap P. (2010). Mathematics-related Beliefs of Filipino College Students: Factors Affecting Mathematics and Problem Solving Performance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 465–475.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 123–149.10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Stéphan, V. L., Joaquin, U., Soumyajit, K., & Gwénaël, J. (2019). Educational Research and Innovation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019 What Has Changed in the Classroom?: What Has Changed in the Classroom?.
Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University, 1-20.
Swan, B., & Dixon, J. (2006). The effects of mentor-supported technology professional development on middle school mathematics teachers' attitudes and practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 67-86.
Tamoria, F. V. (2016). Extent of technology integration in Mathematics teacher education among state institutions in Central Luzon. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1), 1-8.
Tamoria, F. V., Joaquin, M. N. B., & Ibe, M. D. (2018). State institutional characteristics and teacher qualities: effects on curriculum adaptation in mathematics teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(4), 147-160.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. University, Providence, RI.