Engagement and Learning Success: Evidence from Three Years of Transformational Teaching Strategies in Online Event Marketing Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.11.27Keywords:
Event Marketing Education, Transformative Learning, Transformational TeachingAbstract
This study is part of an ongoing teacher-led initiative in understanding the co-creation of a transformative learning experience in the online event marketing classroom. The study measures the impact of student engagement on student-defined learning success in online learning. Using a mixed methods approach, it investigates data collected through a survey questionnaire in three different years from students who enrolled in two course subjects.
This study demonstrates that student engagement is significantly correlated with and predicts learner-defined learning success in online learning. Furthermore, it finds that there were statistically significant differences in levels of student engagement and learning success among different cohorts, particularly when compared to cohorts who took the course subject in the later year. The differences may have been a result of the development of skills appropriate for online learning, and in improvements in course content and delivery.
Downloads
References
Asonitou, S. (2015). Employability skills in higher education and the case of Greece. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 175, 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9725-1
Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining stu-dent engagement. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 43(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096
Balwant, P. T. (2018). The meaning of student engagement and disengagement in the classroom context: Lessons from organi-sational behaviour. Journal of further and higher education, 42(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281887
Bowen, T. (2020). Work-Integrated Learning Placements and Remote Working: Expe-riential Learning Online. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 377-386. (available through ERIC system)
Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engage-ment: Developing a conceptual frame-work and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business, 90(4), 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and gen-eral campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Edu-cation, 32(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878
Conrad, R. M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2012). Con-tinuing to engage the online learner: More activities and resources for creative instruction (Vol. 35). John Wiley & Sons.
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emer-gency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student en-gagement: What is it? Why does it mat-ter?. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Fletcher, A. (2015). Defining student engage-ment: A literature review. Sound out: Promoting Meaningful Student Involve-ment, Student Voice and Student En-gagement. https://soundout.org/2015/03/29/defining-student-engagement-a-literature-review/
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unob-servable variables and measurement er-ror. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Freire, P. (1970a). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herter and Herter.
Freire, P. (1970b). Cultural action and consci-entization. Harvard educational review, 40(3), 452-477. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.40.3.h76250x720j43175
Gardner, M. E., Bodiya, E. C., & Subramanian, S. (2021). Remote learning barriers and op-portunities for graduate student and postdoctoral learners in career and pro-fessional skill development: a case study. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Educa-tion, 22(1), 10-1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2451
Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engage-ment? New directions for teaching and learning, 2018(154), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287
Kitchenham, A. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow's transformative learning theo-ry. Journal of transformative education, 6(2), 104-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344608322678
Kock, N. (2015). WarpPLS 5.0 User Manual. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of stu-dent engagement: Conceptual and empir-ical foundations. New directions for insti-tutional research, 141, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Lin, L. C., Hung, I. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2019). The impact of student engage-ment on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1573-1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9
Luo, Qin, Lunchao Chen, Dongfang Yu, and Ke Zhang. "The Mediating Role of Learning Engagement Between Self-Efficacy and Academic Achievement Among Chinese College Students." Psychology Research and Behavior Management (2023): 1533-1543. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S401145
Mezirow, J. (1978a) Education for Perspective Transformation: Women’s Re-entry Pro-grams in Community Colleges, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University (available through ERIC system).
Mezirow, J. (1978b). Perspective transfor-mation. Adult education, 28(2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171367802800202
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass, 350 San-some Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1997(74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
Nienaber, H., & Martins, N. (2020). Explorato-ry study: Determine which dimensions enhance the levels of employee engage-ment to improve organisational effec-tiveness. The TQM Journal, 32(3), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2019-0151
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psy-chometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation mod-eling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems en-gineering and information systems (pp. 193-221). IGI global.
Salas Velasco, M. (2014). Do higher education institutions make a difference in compe-tence development? A model of compe-tence production at university. Higher Education, 68, 503-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9725-1
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Trans-formational teaching: Theoretical under-pinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational psychology review, 24, 569-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6
Vergara, R.A.G. (2022). Delivering A Trans-formational Learning Experience Online. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(12), 2726-2737. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03.12.24
Vergara, R.A.G. (2023a). Transformative learn-ing in the online classroom: A marketing educator’s autoethnographic account. In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2444-2451. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.24
Vergara, R.A.G. (2023b). The value of experi-ential lessons in event marketing educa-tion. Philippine Academy of Management E-Journal, 6(2), 66-75.
Vergara, R.A.G., & Vergara, K.C.S (2023a). Learning Co-Creation and Self-Determination: Lessons from Teaching Event Marketing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(7), 2566-2573. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.33
Vergara, R.A.G., & Vergara, K.C.S. (2023b). Sto-rytelling in the Classroom: Why it Matters in Event Marketing Education. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2847-2852. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.22
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














