Performance Evaluation Practices of Select Higher Education Institution in the City of Manila: Basis for Enhancing Faculty Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.12.07Keywords:
Immediate superior evaluation, Implementation, Instrument, Peer evaluation, Scheduling, Student evaluation, UtilizationAbstract
Performance evaluation practices for faculty members has been an effective method to improve faculty performance, thus, educational institution must give paramount importance on ways to improve the performance of their faculty members. Indicated in the study of Mamatha, H et al (2021), higher education institutions being the major economic drivers in a nation rely on their faculty for quality of education. Traditional methods of performance evaluation based on quantitative data are more of a mathematical calculation than a scientific approach. The research sought answers to the effectiveness of evaluation practices in terms of student evaluation, peer evaluation and immediate superior evaluation as mechanism to enhance performance of faculty members. The research employed a quantitative-descriptive methodology and the main participants in the research are academic heads and faculty members. Results revealed that, the current evaluation practices of the select educational institution are effective as assessed by the participants. In terms of identifying differences, results revealed that between academic head and faculty members, there was no significant difference in the assessment about student evaluation, peer evaluation and immediate superior evaluation. On the other hand, when faculty members are categorized in terms of employment status, result revealed that their assessment differs on the three evaluation practices.
Downloads
References
Als Ghaffarian, S & Osam, Necdet (2021). A Study of Teacher Performance in English for Academic Purposes Course: Evaluat-ing Efficinecy. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/21582440211050386
Benosa, B & Oñate, J (2023). Design and De-velopment of Fcaulty Evaluation System (FPES v.20) https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/articleabstract/2602/1/030020/2890978/Design-and-development-of-faculty-performance?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Botaccio, LA, Rincon, AN, Ortega, JL, Fuentes, AR (2020). Evaluation for Teachers and Students in Higher Education. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4078
Chirchir, KM & Lentangule, S (2021). The In-fluence of Teacher Performance Apprais-al and Development Implementation on the Secondary Students’ Examination Scores in Public Schools in Kenya. Vol-ume 2, No.6. https://ej-edu.org/index.php/ejedu/article/view/199
Constantinou, C & Wijnen-Meijer, M (2020). Student Evaluations of Teaching and the development of a comprehensive meas-ure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-022-03148-6
Frederick F. Patacsil, Paulo V. Cenas, Bobby F. Roaring, Jennifer M. Parrone, and Daniel Bezalel A. Garcia (2022). Evaluating Pan-gasinan State University Faculty Perfor-mance Using Associative Rule Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 12, No.1. http://www.ijiet.org/vol12/1582-IJIET-2959.pdf
Lohman, Laura (2021). Evaluation of universi-ty teaching as sound performance ap-praisal. Volume 70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X21000341
Mamatha, HK, Sridhar, RM, Balasubramanian, S (2021). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Faculty Performance Evaluation in Higher Education Institution. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3822074
Patacsil F et al (2022). Evaluating Pangasinan State University Faculty Performance Us-ing Associative Rule Analysis. https://www.ijiet.org/show-165-1955-1.html
Paudel, KP (2021). Level of Academic Perfor-mance among Faculty Members in the Context of Nepali Higher Educational In-stitution. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294740.pdf
Peck, C. A., Young, M. G., & Zhang, W. (2021). Using teaching performance assessments for program evaluation and improvement in teacher education. National Academy of Education Committee on Evaluating and Improving Teacher Preparation Pro-grams. National Academy of Education
Prieto, J, Guede-Cid, A, Cid-Cid, A, Leguey, S (2023). Major increases in teachers’ per-formance evaluations: Evidence from student evaluation of teaching surveys. https://tuningjournal.org/article/view/2299
Shum, Simon, Lim, Lisa, Boud, David, Bearman, Margaret, Dawson, Philip (2023). A com-parative analysis of the skilled use of au-tomated feedback tools through the lens of teacher feedback literacy. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00410-9
Suparsa, IM, Seteni, M, Asih, D, Telagawathi, N (2021). Teacher Performance Evaluation through Knowledge Sharing and Tech-nology during the COVID 19 Pandemic. Volume 18. https://webology.org/data-cms/articles/20220129094754pmWEB18168.pdf
Yazdanparast A., Rahimi R, Khoshkholgh R, Marvi N. (2020). Evaluation of Profes-sors' Performance in Online Teaching during Covid-19 Pandemic from the Per-spective of Medical Students of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Med Edu Bull 2020; 2(1): 125-32. DOI:10.22034/MEB.2021.289691.1000
Zhao, Luying, Xu, Pei, Chen, Yusi, Yan, Shuang-sheng (2022). A literature review of the research on students’ evaluation of teach-ing in higher education. Volume 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004487/full
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














