Satisfaction Survey: Use of Facilities, Buildings and Grounds Cleanliness, Communication System and Delivery of Supply in Bulacan State University, Malolos, Bulacan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.08.06Keywords:
satisfaction, employees, management, systemAbstract
The study aims to define the respondent’s level of satisfaction with the facilities management services at Bulacan State University. Specifically, this study sought to answer the research question: What is the satisfaction level of the personnel at Bulacan State University in terms of; a. Use of school facilities; b. Campus and building grounds cleanliness; c. Availability of communication system in the campus; and d. Requisition and deliveries of supplies. This study utilized the Descriptive Research through survey method to obtain data and information needed in determining the extent of the satisfaction level of the respondents on the efficiency of the support services in the university. Based from the results of the study, the researchers have drawn the following conclusions: 1. the satisfaction level of the administrators, non-teaching personnel, and faculty members in the existing procedures on the use of school facilities was satisfied, less satisfied in the cleanliness of the comfort rooms, less satisfied in the timely delivery of supplies, thus resulting to low level of respondent’s satisfaction. On the other hand, majority of the respondents were satisfied with the communication system within the campus but less satisfied with the way that the communication letters/memoranda are being cascaded properly down to the last concerned personnel.
Downloads
References
Barbaro, W.J. (1966) "The Janitor: The Forgotten Man in the School System" Plan B Papers. 558 https://thekeep.eiu.edu/plan_b/558 (Pg 558).
Bruce, W. M. and Blackburn, J. W. (1992) Balancing job satisfaction and performance. Westport, CT: Quor-um Books
Buchanan, D. and Huczynski A. (2013) Organizational Behavior. 8th ed. Pearson Education Limited
Craig, R. (1996) The ASTD training and development handbook: A guide to Human resource develop-ment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dean, P. (1994) Performance engineering at work: Inter-national board of standards for training, perfor-mance and instruction. Illinois: Barrington.
Garber, JA. (1992) The School Janitor: A Study of the Functions and Administration of School Janitor Service. Bureau of Education, Department of the In-terior, Bulletin, No. 24.
Graham, G.H. (1982) Understanding human relations. The individual, Organisations, and Management. Science Research Associates, Chicago Inc.
Feldman, F. (1998) Housekeeping handbook for institu-tion, business, & industry. Canada: Thomas Nelson & Son, Limited Don mills.
Ian Brooks (2006) Organisational Behaviour, Individu-als, Groups and Organisations. 3rd ed. Pearson Ed-ucation Limited.
International Journal of Academic Research Economics and Management Sciences, (2018) Vol.7, No. 4, Oc-tober 2018, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2018 HRMARS 68 Research
Jacobs, R., and Jones, M. (1995) Structured on-the-job training. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick. D. (1998) Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Krech. D, Crutchfield.S.R, and Ballachey. Z.E (1962) Indi-vidual in society. McGraw –Hill, NewYork.
Laurie J. Mullins (2010) Management & Organisational Behaviour. 9th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Lawler E. E. (1992). The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High Involvement Organization, San Francisco; Jossey Basis
Leonard, K. (2018) Behavior Vs. Attitude in Employees, Chron
Livingston, R. (2010) Far-reaching survey measures satisfaction with administrative services, Stanford Report, March 19, 2010
Luthans, F. (2006) Organizational Behavior. 11th ed. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
Martin, I., & Jones, R. (1991) Dictionary of occupation titles (Vol.I) U.S.: Department of Labor.
Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., and Cavender J. W. (1984) A meta-analysis of the relationships
Between individual job satisfaction and individual per-formance. Academy of management Review, 9(4),712-721.
Rahman, HU, and Kodikal (2017) Impact of Employee Work Related Attitudes on Job Performance, Brit-ish Journal of Economics, Finance and Manage-ment Sciences 93 March 2017, Vol. 13 (2) © 2017 British Journals ISSN 2048-125X
Robbins, JM. (2004) How Workers Attitude and Job Sat-isfaction Affect Their Work.
Robbins, Judge and Campbell (2010) Organizational Behavior. 9th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2007) Essentials of Organiza-tional Behavior. 9th ed. Prentice Hall PTR.
Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2013) Organizational Behav-ior. 15th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Robinson-Gaines, D., & Robinson, J. (1998) Moving from training to performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Rothwell, W., Hohne, C., & king, S. (2000) Human per-formance improvement: building practitioner competence. Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.
Rothwell, W., & Kazanas, H. (1994) Improving on-the-job training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Seth, G. (2012) "Analyzing the Effects of Social Media on the Hospitality Industry".UNLV
Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Cap-stones. Retrieved from https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/1346
Srivastav, AK, Das, P, A Study on Employees Attitude Towards the Organization and Job Satisfaction, In-ternational Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Stolovitch, H. and Keeps, E (1999) Handbook of human performance technology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/
Teran, S. and Dommelen-Gonzalez, E. (2017) Excessive Workload in the Janitorial Industry – An Emerging Health and Safety Concern –Labor Occupational Health Program –University of California, Berkeley.
Tessman, C. (2002) Comprehensive annual financial report. Pewaukee, Wisconsin: Waukesha County Technical College, Financial Services
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














