Janitor’s Attitudes: Their Effect on Performance at La Consolacion University Phippines SY 2020-2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.08.05Keywords:
Attitudes, performance, job satisfactionAbstract
The purpose of this research project was to evaluate attitudes of the janitorial workforce in La Consolacion University Philippines of S.Y. 2020-2021 in order to ascertain whether there is a direct relation to their performance.
An attitude is a psychological state of mind. It is the way a person thinks about situations, and it ultimately determines a person's behavior. In the workplace, employees can have either a positive or negative attitude about specific work tasks, products or services, co-workers or management, or the company as a whole. Positive attitudes among employees make workdays more enjoyable. Tasks are performed to a higher standard and without complaint. An example of a positive employee attitude occurs when an employee views a negative customer service call as an opportunity to change the narrative for the customer from a bad experience to a good one. However, bad attitudes result in apathy to daily tasks. Employees are easily agitated by minor problems. Tasks are completed at substandard levels (Leonard, 2018).
Job attitudes such as satisfaction and involvement are criterion for establishing the health of an organization; rendering effective services largely depends on the human resource. Job satisfaction experienced by employees will induce the people to give their best to the organization. Both the attitudes required to enhance the performance of employees. Current study is based on the effect of attitude on employee performance. This study include the attitude related factors (behaviors of employees and leaders, job satisfaction, job commitment, motivation and training) to investigate their impact on employee performance.
This study utilized descriptive method of research. An instrument was developed by the researcher with 8 statements to measure the perceived level of satisfaction, involvement, and performance and then distributed among the respondents with the five- point Likert scale
In the totality, respondents rated majority of the janitors with an approval rating of VERY GOOD to the four janitors and GOOD to the Five Janitors while three of the Janitors got an average rating of FAIR. Result shows that all attitude related factors positively affect the employee performance. Motivation and job commitment has highly significant impact of performance of employees. As a result, organizations should value their experienced personnel and devise effective retention policy by giving competitive salary, experienced base pay and experienced based promotion. That will increase the overall performance of the organization.
Janitors have to change their poor attitudes and must exhibit more dedication towards their job. Other employees have to make effort to correct these attitudes that is affecting the work. The following are recommendations to improve values and attitudes and to increase the individual performance:
- Let the janitors feel the sense of total belongingness and importance not to let them feel that they are categories into the lower level of the organizations, let them be involved and participate in all institutional activities to establish camaraderie.
- Identifying the negative of bad attitudes of the janitors and provide corresponding trainings and seminars to correct their attitudes resulting to poor performance at work.
- Motivating employees to achieve the high level of satisfaction and performance by giving appropriate awards and incentives.
- Ensure feedback is specific – Don't just tell the employee their poor attitude needs to improve. Point out exactly what negative traits they have and the impact each has on their performance and monitor their action periodically for expected change to positive attitude towards work performance.
Generally, workers with good attitudes have stronger performance, and workers with poor attitudes exhibit less-than-superior performance. It is up to managers to monitor employee attitudes and address attitude problems such as negativity and laziness.
Downloads
References
Abelson, R., and Rosenberg, M. (1958). Symbolic psycho-logic: A model of Attitudinal cognition. Wiley Online Library https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030102
Alf Crossman, Bassem Abou‐Zaki, (2003) "Job satisfac-tion and employee performance of Lebanese bank-ing staff", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 18
Issue: 4, pp.368-376, https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940310473118
Argyris, C. (1957) Personality and Organization: the Con-flict between System and the Individual. Harper & Row, New York.
Brayfield, A.H. and Crockett, W.H. (1955). “Employee Attitude and Employee Performance,” Psychologi-cal Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1955, pp. 396-424. doi:10.1037/h0045899
Brown, R., Galanter, E., Hess, E. H., & Mandler, G. (1962). New directions in psychology. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Caldwell, D. and O’ Reilly, C. (1990). Building organiza-tional commitment: A multifirm study. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 63, 245-261 @ 1990 The British Psychological Society
Cummings, T., and Worley, C. (1993). Organizational Development and Change, p. 173. West Publishing Company.
Garber, J.A., (1922). The School Janitor: A Study of the Functions and Administration of School Janitor Service. Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior, Bulletin, No. 24.
Euske, G. et.al, (1980). The Effect of Employee Work Re-lated Attitudes. https://www.academia.edu/31907151
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Hoppocks, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction, New York, Harper.
Hertzberg, C. (1957). Labor Cases: A Selective Reporter of Decisions Rendered by Federal and State Courts Throughout the United States of Federal and State Labor Problems, with Case Table and Topical In-dex, Vol. 32.
Hulin, D. and Smith, P. (1964). Annual Review of Nursing Research, Volume 1: Focus on Human Develop-ment
Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job Satisfac-tion and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psy-chological Bulletin, 97, 251-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251
Krech, D., Crutchfield, R. S., & Ballachey, E. L. (1962). Individual in society: A textbook of social psychol-ogy. McGraw-Hill.
Kelman, H. and Eagly, A. (1956). Attitude toward the Communicator, Perception of Communication Content, and Attitude Change, Northwestern Uni-versity
Lawler, E. and Porter, L. (1967). The Effects of Perfor-mance on Job Satisfaction. Industrial Relations, 7, 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1967.tb01060.x
Lowler, E (1992). Power Processes in Bargaining, The Sociological Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00361.x
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Newstrom, J. and Davis, K. (2002). Organizational Behav-ior: Human Behavior at Work, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2002 - Business & Economics
Pushupa, S., (1981). Poonam, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0237587
Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between indi-vidual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of management Review, 9(4),712-721.
Robbins, J.M. (2004). How Workers Attitude and Job Satisfaction Affect Their Work.
Robbins, Judge and Campbell. (2010). Organisational Behaviour. 9th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2007). Essentials of Organiza-tional Behavior. 9th ed. Prentice Hall PTR.
Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2013). Organizational Behav-ior. 15th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
Rothwell, W., Hohne, C., & king, S. (2000). Human per-formance improvement: building practitioner competence. Texas: Gulf Publishing Company.
Rothwell, W., & Kazanas, H. (1994). Improving on-the-job training. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sector, D. (1997). Retrospective Analysis of the Road Sector, 1997-2005, Asian Development Bank
Teran, S. and van Dommelen-Gonzalez, Evan, (2017). Excessive Workload in the Janitorial Industry – An Emerging Health and Safety Concern –Labor Occu-pational Health Program – University of California, Berkeley
Velnampy, T. (2006). Global Journal of Management and Business Research Volume 12 Issue 18 Version 1.0 Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Re-search Journal. Global Journals Inc. (USA) Print ISSN: 0975-585
Verma, P. (1985). Nomenclature. Journal of Vegetation Science, Vol. 1 (5)
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














