Learning of Science among Students at Risk of Dropping out (Sardo) Using Technology-Driven Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/10.11594/ijmaber.02.12.04Keywords:
Drop- Out Reduction Program, Computer-Based InstructionAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Technology-Driven Intervention in improving science learning among Alegria National High School students at risk of dropping out. This study focused on two groups of twenty (20) Grade 8 Students at Risk of Dropping Out. Ten SARDOs served as the control group and received work text intervention, while the other ten SARDOs received technology-driven intervention. Both groups performed POORLY in Science knowledge at the start of the experiment, according to the results. T-test results also revealed that both the work text intervention and the technology-driven intervention were effective in the learning of SARDOs. The mean gain scores of SARDOs that used technology-driven intervention, on the other hand, were significantly higher. The study concludes that a technology-based intervention is more effective than a traditional intervention for students at risk of dropping out.
Downloads
References
Abidin, M. (2011). A comparative Study of Using Multi-media Annotation and Printed Textual Glossary in Learning Vocabulary. 1, 1.08
Achievement and Problem Solving Skills of the Science and Technology Students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10.
Ahmad R. Nasr, A., Soltani K. (2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student’s Achievement.
Ali, M. (2013, January 1). Changes in Student Atti-tudesRegarding Science When Taught by Teachers Without Experiences With a Model Professional Development Program. School Science and Math-ematics Association.
Aliasgari, M., Riahinia, N. (2010) "Computer‐assisted instruction and student attitudes towards learning mathematics", Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern (3) 6 – 14.
Aloraini, Sara. (July 2012). The Impact of Using Multi-media on Students’ Academic Achievement in the College of Education at Kin Saudi University. Journal of KSU, 24 (2), 75- 82.
Aqda, M., Fatemi, H.,Rahimi, M. (2011). Thecomparative effect of computer-aided instruction and tradition-al teaching on student's creativity in math classes. Procedia Computer Science 2011 3 266-270
Bowers, Alex J. (2010). Publishing models and article dates explained. Published online: 08 Jul 2010, 191-207.
Cai, H., Wang, Yanhong, L. (2012). Research and Devel-opment Based on Interactive Computer Aided In-struction Software. IERI Procedia, 2.
Conradty, C, Bogner, F X. (2011). Computer-aided learn-ing: Unguided versus guided instruction.Advanced Science Letters.(4) 3310-331.
Cornelia, R., March. (2012). Drop-rate of Secondary Stu-dents as Influenced by Socio-Economic Factors and Students Factors.Graduate School, Mindanao State University.
Crisol, A. (2012, November 6). Transcript of Dropout reductionprogram.
Cruse, E. (2011). Using Educational Video in the Class-room: Theory, Research and Practice. Library Vid-eo Company.
Daus, L.J. (2013). The Effect of Computer Assisted In-struction (CAI) on the Academic Achievement in Physics of Secondary Students in NDMU-IBED. Graduate School of Mindanao State University.
Gunes, H. (2010). Investigation of Effects of Modelling and Computer Assisted Instruction on Academic Achievement. Mayıs University, Turkey Educa-tional Research.
Joshi, A. (2012). Multimedia: A Technique in Teaching Process in the Classrooms. Curr World Environ, 1: 33- 36.
Liu, P., Chenb, C. (2010). Change, Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy onEFL college students’ English reading comprehen-sion.Oxford, UK, Journal Computer Education, 54 2, 436-445
Matanluk, O., Mohammad, B. (2013). The Effectiveness of Using Teaching Module Based on Radical Con-structivism toward Students Learning Process. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 90, 607-615.
Mazzotti, Valerie L., Charles L. Wood, David W. Test, (2011, December 29). Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Students’ Knowledge of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction and Disruptive Behavior. University of North Caro-lina at Charlotte.
Newell,Alana D.*, Zientek L. (2015, May 5).Students' Attitudes Toward Science as Predictors of Gains on Student Content Knowledge: Benefits of an Af-ter-School Program. 115, 1, 216-255, DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12125
Nico, Wouter R. van Joolingenb, Jan T. van der Veen (2012).Thelearning effects of computer simula-tions in science education.136–153.
Nie, Sen, Liu, Yan. (2011). Proceedings - 2011 4th Inter-national Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineer-ing, 1 453-455
Omrod, J.E. (2010, July 20). Characteristics of Students at Risk and Why Students Drop Out.Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall.
Orbeta, Aniceto Jr. C. (2010). Global study on child pov-erty and disparities: Philippines. Filipino Child Policy Brief UNICEF-PIDS project Senior Re-searchFellow at the Institute.
Özdener, Nesrin, Eşfer, Sezin. (2009). A comparison of computer- aided ELVES method and video-aided instruction in text. teaching in terms of student success. 1, 2327-233.
Palanca, Troy James. (2015, August 27). A look at drop-out rates in the Philippines.
Pappas, Christopher. (2014- 08-07). Computer-Based Instruction Theory.
Pedreira, K., Pear, J. (2015). Motivation and Attitude in a Computer-Aided Personalized System of Instruc-tion Course on Discrete-Trials Teaching. Journal on Developmental Disabilities (21)1, 46-51.
Şeker, Soner. (2013). Computer - Aided Learning in En-gineering Education Social and Behavioral Science. (83) 739-742
Serin, Oguz. (2011). The Effects of the Computer-Based Instruction on the Achievement and Problem Solv-ing Skills of the Science and Technology Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, (10)1, 183-201.
Serin, Oğuz. (2011). The Effects of the Computer-based Instruction on the
Shah Z.,Mahmood, N., (2013, September 28). Attitude Towards Science Learning: An Exploration of Pa-kistani Students. Journal of Turkish Science Educa-tion, 10, 2, 35-47.
Slavin, Robert E. (2011). Small-Group, Computer Assist-ed Tutoring to Improve Reading Outcomes for Struggling First and Second Graders. The Elemen-tary School Journal (111)4, 625-640. Published by: University of Chicago Press.
Smetana, L., Bellb, R. (2011, August 09). Computer Simu-lations to Support Science Instruction and Learn-ing: A critical review of the literature. 1337-1370.
Song, C., Beninb, M., Glickb, J., (2012, February 23). Dropping Out of High School: The Effects of Family Structure and Family Transitions,18-33.
Soo,Y., Parker, L. (2015, October 01). Changes in Elemen-tary Student Perceptions of Science, Scientists, and Science Careers After Participating in a Curricular Module on Health and Veterinary Science. DOI: School of Science and Mathemat-ics 10.1111/ssm.12129.
Tan, Da Peng,Ji, Shi Ming, Jin, Ming Sheng. Intelligent computer-aided instruction modeling and a meth-od to optimize study strategies for parallel robot instruction. 56 3 268 273
Thangarajathi, S., Enk, T. (2012, May). Impact of Multi-media in Teaching and Learning. Academic Jour-nal. 1 11.
Tzu-Hua H., Liu Y. (2012, January). Learning Achieve-ment in Solving Word-Based Mathematical Ques-tions through a Computer-Assisted Learning Sys-tem. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 15 1 Technology Supported Cognition and Explor-atory Learning, 248-259.
Villar, M. (2008 June 3). No Filipino Child LeftBehind Act of 2008. 14th CongressSenate Bill No. 2366.
Yi,H., Linxiu, Z., RenfuLuoa, Y. Di Moc, (2012, July). Dropping out: Why are students leaving junior high in China's poor rural areas? 32, 4, 555–563.
Yusuf, M., Olalere, A., Adedeji, O. (2010, January). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Sec-ondary School Students' Performance in Biolo-gy).Turkish Online Journal of Educational Tech-nology - TOJET, v9 n1 62-69.
Zemlainsky, P., Wilcox, D. (2010). Design and Imple-mentation of Educational Games: Theoritical and Practical Perspectives. Information Science Refer-ence. United States of America.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
