Students’ Exposure to Generative AI Models and Its Influence on English Writing Proficiency

Authors

  • John Marvin D. Renacido College of Teacher Education, Aklan State University, 5601 Banga, Aklan, Philippines
  • Jemuel Teodosio College of Teacher Education, Aklan State University, 5601 Banga, Aklan, Philippines
  • Rodje D. Dumalaog College of Teacher Education, Aklan State University, 5601 Banga, Aklan, Philippines
  • Benedicta D. Repayo College of Teacher Education, Aklan State University, 5601 Banga, Aklan, Philippines
  • Ersyl T. Biray College of Teacher Education, Aklan State University, 5601 Banga, Aklan, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.05

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Generative AI, AI models, English writing proficiency

Abstract

The predominance of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) models on the web poses significant effects on the learning habits of the students at a state university due to its convenience in terms of access, grammar correction, paraphrasing text, and generating ideas. As a result, these features of Gen AI models have been the cause of the dissented researchers’ conclusion, and teachers raise concerns regarding their possible disadvantages to the students. Several researchers have shown the advantages and disadvantages of using Gen AI models in the academic endeavors of students. Hence, this study determined the relationship between exposure to Gen AI tools and the English writing proficiency of freshmen students specializing in the English language under an education program in a state university in the northern part of Panay Island in the Philippines. The descriptive correlation design was utilized to examine the relationship between two variables. A validated researcher-made questionnaire and essay writing performance test were used to gather the students’ profiles and to measure their English writing proficiency, respectively. Results revealed that the majority of the freshmen education students specializing in English language were female, most have used the Gen AI tool Quillbot but have low exposure to other Gen AI tools, and a moderately satisfactory rating in their English writing proficiency. It further established that the English writing proficiency has no or negligible relationship with their exposure to Gen AI tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldaroso, I., Armantier, O., Doerr, S., Gamba-corta, L., & Oliviero, T. (2024). The gen AI gender gap. Economic Letters, 241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecpnlet.2024.111814

Aljuaid, H. (2024). The impact of artificial in-telligence tools on academic writing in-struction in higher education: A systemat-ic review. Arab World English Journal Special Issue on ChatGPT. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.2

Al-Raimi, M., Mudhsh, B. A., Al-Yafaei, Y., Al-Maashani, S. (2024). Utilizing artificial in-telligence tools for improving writing skills: Exploring Omani EFL learners’ perspectives. Forum for Linguistic Stud-ies, 6(2): 1177. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1177

Al-Smadi, M. (2023). ChatGPT and beyond: The generative AI revolution in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15198.

Austria, F. Z., Camagay, E.B. A., Domasing, M., Gelido, A., Libatique, C. V., & Cabutotan, V. M. (2022). The extent of influence of us-ing AI Chatbots on the writing skills of BSE students of Pangasinan State Univer-sity – Lingayen Campus. Southeast Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 7(1). www.sajst.org

Bransen, M. (2024, January). The 22 best AI education tools (students and teachers) in 2024. https://tilburg.ai/2024/01/best-ai-education-tools/

Chan, C.K.Y., & Hu, W. Students’ voices on gen-erative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher educa-tion. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Cherry, K. (2024). What is sociocultural theo-ry? Recognizing the role that society and socialization play in learning. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-sociocultural-theory-2795088

Dalan, J. S. (2024). Exploring the promise: A comprehensive review of artificial intelli-gence integration in language education in the Philippine context. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Develop-ment Journal, 1. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27224.51201

Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2007). Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson Education.

Dja’far, V. H., & Hamidah, F. N. (2024). The ef-fectiveness of AI technology in improving academic English writing skills in higher education. Journal of English and Litera-ture Studies, 4(3), https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i3.2031

Dumitru, A. M., Anagnoste, S., & Savastano, M. (2024, July). Unleashing the potential: Harnessing generative artificial intelli-gence for empowering model training. Proceedings of the International Confer-ence on Business Excellence, 18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0294

Fabro, R. B. B., Rivera, J. C., Sambrano, L. C., Dinoy, L. J. M., Alcozer, N. G., & Agustin, M. C. (2024). Perceptions and extent of utilization of generative artificial intelli-gence (AI) among Filipino students. In-ternational Journal of Education and Re-search, 12(7). https://ijern.com/journal/2024/July-2024/09.pdfttps://ijern.com/journal/2024/July-2024/09.pdf

Farrokhnia, M., Banishashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. DOI: 10.1080/147032397.2023.2195846

Fontanilla, J., Bautista, K. M., Jr., Villacorte, M., & Santos, R. (2023). Educators' perspec-tives on the impact of artificial intelli-gence on writing competence. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary Re-search and Publications, 6(6). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375769974

Gasaymeh, A. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University students’ insights in-to generative artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools. MDPI Education Sciences, 14(10). DOI: 10.3390/educsci14101062

Giray, L., De Silos, P. Y., Adornado, A., Buelo, R. J. V., Galas, E., Reyes-Chua, E., … Ulanday, Ma. L. (2024). Use and impact of artificial intelligence in Philippine higher educa-tion: Reflections from instructors and administrators. Internet Reference Ser-vices Quarterly, 28(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2352746

Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adver-sarial networks. Advances in Neural In-formation Processing Systems, 3. DOI: 10.1145/3422622

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of edu-cation: Exploring the potential and con-sequences of AI and ChatGPT in educa-tional settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsc13070692

Gultekin Talayhan, O., & Babayigit, M. V. (2023). The influence of AI writing tools on the content and organization of stu-dents’ writing: A focus on EFL instructors’ perspectives. Current Debates in Social Sciences, 6(2), 83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/cudes.71701

Hadzic, A. (2021). On constructivism in AI – past, present, and future. https://artlexa.medium.com/on-constructionism-in-ai-past-present-and-future-

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. (2023). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abili-ties, and challenges. Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards, and Evaluations, 2. DOI: 100089. 10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089

Hong, W.C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learn-ing: Opportunities in education and re-search. Journal of Educational Technolo-gy and Innovation, 5(1). DOI: 10.61414/jet.v5i1.103

Iskender, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with Open AI's ChatGPT. European Jour-nal of Tourism Research, 3414. DOI: 10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169

Jack, R., & Heng, A. (2024, May). Generative AI in the classroom: Overcoming challenges for effective teaching. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24826.71367

Jackson, A. (2024). Top 10 generative AI tools. https://aimagazine.com/top10/top-10-generative-ai-tools

Johinke, R., Cummings, R., & Di Lauro, F. (2023). Reclaiming the technology of higher education for teaching digital writ-ing in a post-pandemic world. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Prac-tice, 20(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.01

Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T. (2020). A style-based generator architecture for genera-tive adversarial networks. IEEE Transac-tions on Pattern Analysis and Machine In-telligence, PP 1-1. DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2020.2970919

Kurniati, E., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of Quill-bot utilization in English academic writ-ing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(437). DOI: 10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852

Lam, R., & Moorhouse, B. (2022). Using digital portfolios to develop students’ writing: A practical guide for language teachers. DOI: 10.4324/9781003295860

Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2023). Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review. Psychology Marketing, 39, 1129-1155. DOI: 10.1002/mar.21654

Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2024). Who on earth is us-ing Generative AI? In Policy Research Working Paper 10870, World Bank Group Digital Development Global Practice. http://www.worldbank.org/prwp

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D. Darwin, & In-drawati, I. (2024). The impact of AI writ-ing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ per-spective. Cogent Education, 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in education: The responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN Electron-ic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4354422.

Mozumder, M. A., Sheeraz, M., Athar, A., Aich, S. & Kim, H. (2022). Overview: Technolo-gy roadmap of the future trend of metaverse based on IoT, blockchain, AI techniques, and medical domain metaverse activity. DOI: 10.23919/ICACT53585.2022.9728808

Onal, S., & Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2023). A cross-disciplinary examination of the instruc-tional uses of ChatGPT in higher educa-tion. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231196532

Owen, A. (2025). The role of Generative AI in shifting the paradigm of constructivist learning theories. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392522620

Quranta, J. (2017). Descriptive correlational research: Asthma management by school nurses. https://methods.sagepub.com/case/descriptive-correlationalresearch-asthma-management-researchasthmamanagement-school-nurses

Rahmi, R., Amalina, Z., Andriansyah, & Rodg-ers, A. (2024). Does it help? Exploring the impact of an AI-generated writing assis-tant on the students’ English writing. Studies in English Language and Educa-tion, 11(2), 998-1012.

Rosenbaum, E. (2024, June). AI is getting very popular among students and teachers, very quickly. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/11/ai-is-getting-very-popular-among-students-and-teachers-very-quickly.html

Santiago Jr., C., Embang, S., Conlu, M.T., Acan-to, R., Lausa, S., Ambojia, K.W.,..., Ro-masanta, K.N. (2023). Utilization of writ-ing assistance tools in research in select-ed higher learning institutions in the Phil-ippines: A text mining analysis. Interna-tional Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.11.14

Soriano, S., Martinez Jr, R. A., Pabalan III, J. L., Dulay, M.J. B., Fangon, M. R., Rosales, R.S. T., Nabor-Ferrer, C., & Mathur, A. (2024). Effectiveness of meta-AI in enhancing ac-ademic writing efficiency: The case of Fil-ipino ESL learners. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology and Computer, 44(3). https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB

Tambunan, A., Andayani, W., Sari, W., & Lubis, F. (2022). Investigating EFL students’ lin-guistic problems using Grammarly as au-tomated writing evaluation feedback. In-donesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 16-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46428

Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian stu-dents perceive it? Contemporary Educa-tional Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Van den Berg, G. (2024). Generative AI and educators: Partnering in using open digi-tal content for transforming education. Open Praxis, 16, 130-141. DOI: 10.55982/openpraxis 16.2.640

Van den Berg, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2023). ChapGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking, and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13, 998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

Ventura, A. M. C., & Lopez, L. S. (2024). Un-locking the future of learning: Assessing students’ awareness and usage of AI tools. International Journal of Infor-mation and Education Technology, 14(8). DOI: 10.18177/IJIET

Yao, J. (2024). The application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in education: Poten-tial, challenges, and strategies. SHS Web of Conferences, 200. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/202420002008.

Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational re-form: Current status, issues, and pro-spects. Frontiers in Education, 8. DOI: 10.3389/feduc 2023.1183162

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Renacido, J. M. D., Teodosio, J. ., Dumalaog, R. D., Repayo, B. D., & Biray, E. T. (2025). Students’ Exposure to Generative AI Models and Its Influence on English Writing Proficiency. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(8), 3796-3807. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.05