A Comparative Study on Creative Self-Concept among Millennials and Gen Z

Authors

  • Ninna Loise R. Mabagos College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • Erika F. Mallari College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • Ivan Remoh Q. Manabat College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • Zairah C. Maulas College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • May B. Mirando College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • Jerald Q. Vergara College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines
  • Kimberly Ann S. Cantilero College of Arts and Sciences, Our Lady of Fatima University, City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 2000, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.07

Keywords:

Age group, Comparative, Creative self-concept, Generational comparison

Abstract

Creativity shapes how individuals solve problems, express themselves, and innovate. How individuals view creativity is vital as it shapes how they adapt, solve problems, and thrive in everyday situations. This study explored the creative self-concept of Millennials and Generation Z in Central Luzon, Philippines. Creative self-concept encompasses both creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity, referring to how individuals perceive their creativity. While generational differences in values and skills are widely studied, little is known about how Filipino Millennials and Generation Z perceive their creativity. Using a cross-sectional survey method, information was gathered from 300 respondents, evenly split between their generation group. The independent sample t-test revealed that there is no significant difference in creative self-concept between the participants’ generations (p = 0.19). Similarly, a non-significant result was also observed between respondents’ geographical locations (p = 0.12). However, results from ANOVA revealed that people with more schooling (F = 7.94, p < 0.001) had more creative ideas about themselves compared to those who had lower educational attainment. These results showed that educational experiences may have a bigger effect on how people think about creativity than their generational group or where they live. The study highlights the importance of incorporating activities that foster imagination in schools, enabling students of all ages to generate new ideas and feel confident in their abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The application of digital tech-nology and the learning characteristics of generation z in higher education. arXiv preprint, 1-7. https://tinyurl.com/4v3nnw7f

Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary stu-dents. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4

Catarino, P., Vasco, P., Lopes, J., Silva, H., & Morais, E. (2019). Aprendizaje cooperativo para promover el pensamiento creativo y la creatividad matemática en la educación superior. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.3.001

Cenita, J. A. S., & De Guzman, Z. R. (2023). Edu-cation in the digital world: From the lens of millennial learners. International Jour-nal of Computing Sciences Research, 7, 1816-1829. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.132

Chen, X., & Cheng, L. (2023). Emotional intelli-gence and creative self-efficacy among gifted children: Mediating effect of self-esteem and moderating effect of gender. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010017

Cueto, L. J., Frisnedi, A. F. D., Collera, R. B., Ba-tac, K. I. T., & Agaton, C. B. (2022). Digital innovations in MSMEs during economic disruptions: Experiences and challenges of young entrepreneurs. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010008

Fang, Y., & Chang, C. (2023). The impact of in-novation climate on creative self-efficacy and creativity performance in higher ed-ucation. International Journal of Higher Education, 12(4), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v12n4p104

Gerfanova, E., Ismagulova, A., Rakisheva, G., Sabitova, D., & Yessengaliyeva, A. M. (2025). Educational environment and the quality of foreign language teaching: Per-spectives of Kazakhstani urban and rural EFL teachers. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p303

Gill, D., & Prowse, V. (2024). The creativity premium: Exploring the link between childhood creativity and life outcomes. Journal of Political Economy Microeco-nomics, 2(3), 495-526. https://doi.org/10.1086/730453

Ginns, P., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Jolly, J. L. (2023). Creative self-beliefs in children and adolescents: A tripartite model. Aus-tralian Educational Researcher, 50(3), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231177097

Granello, F., Cuder, A., Doz, E., Pellizzoni, S., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2025). Improving math self-efficacy and math self-concept in middle school: a narrative systematic review. European Journal Of Psychology Of Education, 40(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00939-5

He, W. J., & Zhang, K. (2024). The moderating effect of cultural orientation on the rela-tionship between growth mindset and learning self-efficacy: A dimension-specific pattern. Behavioral Sciences, 14(12), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121155

Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). The influence of generative artificial intelligence on crea-tive cognition of design students: a chain mediation model of self-efficacy and anx-iety. Frontiers in psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015

Jeong, J., & Lee, H. (2023). Creative perfor-mance of Millennials and Generation Z: What matters more, intrinsic or extrinsic rewards? Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 11. https://tinyurl.com/5svktwnw

Jeresano, E. M., & Carretero, M. D. (2022). Dig-ital culture and social media slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Re-search & Technology, 3(4), 11-25. https://tinyurl.com/yezmxr49

Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask… But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Crea-tivity, and the Arts, 5(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021427

Krishna, S. M., & Agrawal, S. (2025). Creative Performance of Millennials and Genera-tion Z: What Matters More, Intrinsic or Extrinsic Rewards? Administrative Sci-ences, 15(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010011

Leng, X., Zhang, X., Georgiou, G. K., Inoue, T., Liu, H., Xing, A., ... & Shu, H. (2024). The relation between family factors and chil-dren’s vocabulary knowledge: a compar-ative study of rural and urban preschool-ers in China. Journal of Child Language, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000357

Liu, D., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Dang, J. (2025). How self-belief in creativity and well-being is associated with life satisfaction, meaning in life, and psychological rich-ness: the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Intelligence, 13(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13030025

Niu, X., Gou, L. X., Han, Y., Zhou, X., & Wang, J. L. (2024). Self-concept clarity and envy as mediators between upward social com-parison on social networking sites and subjective well-being. British Journal of Development Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12538

Patel, T. A. (2024). An Exploratory Survey on Self-Concept and Social Comparison Ori-entation in Indians. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/1204.255

Ragab, N. A., Monem, H. A., & Ahmed, G. S. (2025). Social variables related to envi-ronmental resource wastage among basic education students: A comparative study between rural and urban areas. Journal of Environmental Science, 54(2), 392-413. https://doi.org/10.21608/jes.2025.210387.1523

Tian, F., Tan, H. S. H., & Yang, Y. T. (2025). The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Attitude, Entrepreneurial Education, and Entrepreneurial Intentions of Millennial College Students, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Mediator. Business Manage-ment and Strategy, 16(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v16i1.22480

Tirocchi, S. (2024). Generation Z, values, and media: from influencers to BeReal, be-tween visibility and authenticity. Fron-tiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1304093

Wandhe, P. (2024). The new generation: Un-derstanding millennials and Gen Z. Inter-national Journal of Emerging Technolo-gies and Innovative Research, 11(1), 114–126. https://tinyurl.com/3cujfwhf

Yehya, A., Ausmees, L., Gosling, S. D., Potter, J., & Realo, A. (2025). Age as a moderator of gender/sex differences in personality traits across countries. OSF Preprints. 1-55. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u8wbn

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Mabagos, N. L. R. ., Mallari, E. F. ., Manabat, I. R. Q. ., Maulas, Z. C. ., Mirando, M. B. ., Vergara, J. Q. ., & Cantilero , K. A. S. . (2025). A Comparative Study on Creative Self-Concept among Millennials and Gen Z. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(8), 3816-3825. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.07