Looking at the State University’s Organizational Culture Through the Lens of Part-Time Faculty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.01Keywords:
Adhocracy culture, Clan culture, Hierarchy culture, Market culture, Organizational culture, , Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI), , Part-time facultyAbstract
This study investigated the organizational culture of a state university in the Philippines through the perceptions of part-time faculty members using the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). The OCAI assesses six dimensions of organizational culture: dominant characteristics, organizational leadership, employee management, organizational glue, strategic emphasis, and success criteria. Ten contract-of-service faculty members participated in the study, allocating 100 points among four cultural types (Clan, Adhocracy, Market, and Hierarchy) for each dimension to represent the existing and preferred cultures. The results showed that the existing culture was dominated by Clan culture (31.17 points), characterized by a friendly work environment and high employee commitment, followed by Hierarchy (27.83 points), Adhocracy (21.67 points), and Market cultures (19.33 points). The preferred culture profile indicated a desire for slight shifts, with increases in Adhocracy (2.66 points) and Market (5.17 points) cultures, and decreases in Clan (0.84 points) and Hierarchy (7 points) cultures. The differences between the existing and preferred profiles were less than 10 points, suggesting that there was no urgent need for cultural change. The findings contribute to understanding the organizational dynamics in Philippine state universities and may inform institutional policies and practices that support part-time faculty engagement and effectiveness. Recommendations include implementing strategies to balance the desired cultural shifts while maintaining the strengths of the existing clan culture, providing professional development opportunities, and conducting further research to examine the impact of organizational culture on faculty outcomes.
Downloads
References
Aldalimy, M. J. H., Bannay, D. F., & Al-Sharifi, A. K. H. (2019). Strategic Alignment Role in Achieving the Organizational Excellence through Organizational Dexterity. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.6.41
Aldhafeeri, N. A. (2024). Organizational Cul-ture: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 37(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184241269891
Aryal, A., Garcia, F. B., Scheitler, A. J., Faraon, E. J. A., Moncatar, T. J. R. T., Saniel, O. P., Lorenzo, F. M. E., Rosadia, R. A. F., Shim-khada, R., Macinko, J., & Ponce, N. A. (2023). Evolving academic and research partnerships in global health: a capacity-building partnership to assess primary healthcare in the Philippines. Global Health Action, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2216069
Batiste, H., Garcia, C., & Benson, W. L. (2021). I am not worthy: How interpersonal expe-riences influence perceived value and worth of full- and part-time faculty. Man-agement in Education, 37(4), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/08920206211027633
Bilimoria, D., & Singer, L. T. (2019). Institu-tions Developing Excellence in Academic Leadership (IDEAL). Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-10-2017-0209
Buonomo, I., Benevene, P., & Fiorilli, C. (2020). Meaning of work in a group of school principals: the role of organizational var-iables. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(6), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-12-2019-0146
Cetin, S., Sert, M., & Gürbüz, S. (2015). A Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Or-ganizational Commitment and Organiza-tional Citizenship Behavior: Test of Po-tential Moderator Variables. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 27(4), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-015-9266-5
Chennattuserry, J. (2022). Clan Culture in Or-ganizational Leadership and Strategic Emphases: Expectations Among School Teachers in India. Journal of School Ad-ministration Research and Development, 7(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v7i1.3585
Cieciora, M., Pietrzak, P., Bołkunow, W., Dęb-ski, M., & Kandefer, K. (2021). Differ-ences in the Perception of Organizational Culture in Non-Public Universities in Po-land by Academic and Administrative Staff – A Study Based on Cameron and Quinn’s Model. Foundations of Manage-ment, 13(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0010
Culver, K. C., Barnhardt, C. L., & Young, R. L. (2020). Communicating Support: Examin-ing Perceived Organizational Support among Faculty Members with Differing Appointment Types. Innovative Higher Education, 45(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09503-z
Dalessandro, C., & Lovell, A. (2024). Work-place Inclusion Initiatives Across the Globe: The Importance of Leader and Coworker Support for Employees’ Atti-tudes, Beliefs, and Planned Behaviors. So-cieties, 14(11), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14110231
Deem, J. W., Delotell, P. J., & Kelly, K. (2015). The relationship of employee status to organizational culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-02-2014-0018
Dobrin, C., Dinulescu, R., & Dima, C. (2021). Evaluating the Organizational Culture from Romanian Private Companies Using the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). Studies in Business and Economics, 16(3), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2021-0045
Donglong, Z., Julie, A., Sanghun, L., & Taejun, C. (2019). The structural relationship be-tween organizational justice and organi-zational citizenship behavior in university faculty in China: the mediating effect of organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09617-w
Eldridge, S., Ariza Montes, J. A., Morales Fer-nández, E. J., & Leal Rodríguez, A. L. (2016). Assessing the links between or-ganisational cultures and unlearning ca-pability: evidence from the Spanish au-tomotive components industry. Interna-tional Journal of Innovation and Learn-ing, 20(4), 422. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2016.10000466
Fernandes, P., Wiedenhöft, G., & Pereira, R. (2023). Organizational culture and the individuals’ discretionary behaviors at work: a cross-cultural analysis. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1190488
Gebretsadik, D. M. (2020). Impact of oraniza-tional culture on the effectiveness of pub-lic higher educational institutions in Ethi-opia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1722248
Gelman, C., Gandel, J., & Bausman, M. (2022). A Multi-faceted, Adjunct-Centered Initiative to Support Part-time Faculty. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 42(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2021.2013000
Hasan, D., Wibowo, W., Sudiarditha, I. K. R., Susita, D., & Hakim, L. (2024). Analysis of Determinants Factors Affecting Organiza-tional Citizenship Behaviour in Post-Merger Sharia Banks. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(9), e06592. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-079
Jekabsone, I., & Anohina-Naumeca, A. (2024). The role of universities in enabling open innovation through the development of digital competence of faculty. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(4), 100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100409
Kartolo, A. B., & Kwantes, C. T. (2019). Organi-zational culture, perceived societal and organizational discrimination. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(6), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-10-2018-0191
Kinder, C. J., Trad, A. M., Woods, A. M., Graber, K. C., & Richards, K. A. (2023). Perceived organizational support, marginalization, isolation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction of PETE faculty members. European Physical Education Review, 29(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231159636
Knezović, E., & Smajić, H. (2022). Employee Participation in the Decision-Making Pro-cess and Organizational Citizenship Be-havior: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment. Organizacija, 55(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0005
Köse, M. F., & Korkmaz, M. (2019). Why are some universities better? An evaluation in terms of organizational culture and ac-ademic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1213–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1634679
Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Ariza-Montes, J. A., El-dridge, S., & Morales-Fernández, E. J. (2015). Understanding How Organiza-tional Culture Typology Relates to Organ-izational Unlearning and Innovation Ca-pabilities. Journal of the Knowledge Econ-omy, 10(4), 1497–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0344-6
Maimad, M. T., Villegas, J. P., & Dupa, H. J. P. (2023). Parental Involvement and Aca-demic Achievement: Keys to Translating No Poverty and Quality Education SDGs in Philippine Peripheral Communities. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustain-ability, 25(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0017
Marcillo Indacochea, M. M., Fernández Con-cepción, R. R., & Lorenzo, A. F. (2018). Management of Organizational Culture in the Public Institutions of Ecuador Educa-tional Sector. Quality Innovation Prosper-ity, 22(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v1i1.1044
Nguyen, P. N.-D., Tran, V. D., & Le, D. N.-T. (2022). Does organizational citizenship behavior predict organizational commit-ment of employees in higher educational institutions? Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.909263
Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument. (n.d.). About the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). https://www.ocai-online.com/about-the-Organizational-Culture-Assessment-Instrument-OCAI
Palma, E. J. C., & West, G. R. (2023). Working in uncertainty: Organizational behavior of contingent college teachers in the Philip-pines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 1854. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25290
Pooja, A. A., De Clercq, D., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2016). Job Stressors and Organization-al Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Or-ganizational Commitment and Social In-teraction. Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 27(3), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21258
Shim, H. S., Hoover, L. T., & Jo, Y. (2015). Po-lice transformational leadership and or-ganizational commitment. Policing: An In-ternational Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(4), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-05-2015-0066
Shrestha, M. (2022). Contribution of Job Satis-faction to Organizational Citizenship Be-havior: A Survey of the School Teachers of Nepal. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 7(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v7i1.2165
Steinert, Y., O’Sullivan, P. S., & Irby, D. M. (2024). The Role of Faculty Development in Advancing Change at the Organization-al Level. Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Col-leges, 99(7), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005732
Szi̇egat, H. (2022). Transforming Governance of German Higher Education Institutions. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(3), 472–517. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1164190
Trivedi, R., & Prakasha, G. S. (2021). Student alienation and perceived organizational culture: A correlational study. Interna-tional Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(4), 1149. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21304
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lorlyn T. Abe, Charlie T. Anselmo, Ma. Andrea G. Ingente

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














