The Potential of Portable AR in Physics Education: A Study on Student Perceptions

Authors

  • Charlie T. Anselmo College of Education, Isabela State University, Cauayan City, Isabela, Philippines 3305
  • Artemio B. Saet College of Education, Isabela State University, Echague, Isabela, Philippines 3309
  • Angelica P. Magleleong College of Education, Isabela State University, City of Ilagan, Isabela, Philippines 3300
  • Apol Joy D. Cagayan College of Education, Isabela State University, San Mariano, Isabela, Philippines 3332
  • Fely T. Corpuz College of Education, Isabela State University, San Mateo, Isabela, Philippines 3318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.14

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Educational Technology, , Learning Outcomes, , Physics Education, , Resource Constraints, Student Perceptions, , Virtual Laboratory

Abstract

Integrating portable augmented reality (AR) into physics education has the potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. This study investigates students' perceptions of the appeal and effectiveness of the Traveling Virtual Lab (TVL), a solar-powered AR learning kit designed to improve physics education in the Philippines. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing the "Student Acceptance of Virtual Laboratory questionnaire" adapted from Park (2009). The sample consisted of 58 students, with a balanced gender distribution and a majority at the tertiary-education level. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed to address the research questions. The results indicate that students perceive TVL as appealing and effective for learning physics concepts, with mean ratings of 3.9 for both variables. No significant differences were found in perceptions based on gender or grade. This study highlights the potential of portable AR to enhance physics education by providing immersive and interactive experiences that can visualize complex concepts and overcome resource constraints. However, challenges remain, including technological accessibility and the need for training teachers. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature on AR in education and have implications for the development and implementation of virtual laboratory technologies, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Future research should focus on addressing implementation challenges and exploring the long-term impact on student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algerafi, M. A. M., Oubibi, M., Wijaya, T. T., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Aug-mented Reality and Virtual Reality in Ed-ucation. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953

Aljuhani, K., Meccawy, M., Althabiti, M., & Sonbul, M. (2018). Creating a Virtual Sci-ence Lab (VSL): the adoption of virtual labs in Saudi schools. Smart Learning En-vironments, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0067-9

Alhashem, F., & Alfailakawi, A. (2023). Tech-nology-enhanced learning through virtual laboratories in chemistry education. Con-temporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep474. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739

Anselmo, C., Aquino, J. L., Dumelod, D., Abe, L., Ingente, M. A., Dimaano, V., … Anselmo, M. C. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of AR-Enhanced Virtual Traveling Labs on Physics Teaching and Learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(1), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0631

Asiksoy, G. (2023). Effects of Virtual Lab Expe-riences on Students’ Achievement and Perceptions of Learning Physics. Interna-tional Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i11.39049

Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Salazar Arias, M., & Sepulveda-Valenzuela, E. (2020). Aug-mented Reality as a Sustainable Technol-ogy to Improve Academic Achievement in Students with and without Special Educa-tional Needs. Sustainability, 12(19), 8116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198116

Bajaj, A. (2023). Impact of Virtual Reality (Vr) and Augmented Reality (Ar) in Education. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Tech-nology, 44(4), 1310–1318. https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.1014

Bangga-Modesto, D. (2024). Examining Stu-dent Perception on Mobile Augmented Reality Integration, Gender Differences, Learning Styles, Feedback, Challenges, and Opportunities in an Online Physics Class. Science Education International, 35(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i1.1

Bernardo, A. B. I., Cordel, M. O., Calleja, M. O., Teves, J. M. M., Yap, S. A., & Chua, U. C. (2023). Profiling low-proficiency science students in the Philippines using machine learning. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01705-y

Canright, J. P., & White Brahmia, S. (2024). Modeling novel physics in virtual reality labs: An affective analysis of student learning. Physical Review Physics Educa-tion Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.010146

Chandir, H. (2020). Student responses on the survey of global competence in PISA 2018. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1844153

Crogman, H. T., Sonawane, R. B., Boroon, R., Pacheco, E., & Cano, V. D. (2025). Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Experiential Learning: Trans-forming Educational Paradigms. Educa-tion Sciences, 15(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030303

Deng, W., Wang, L., & Deng, X. (2024). Explor-ing Interactive Learning Environments Based on Augmented Reality Technology. International Journal of Interactive Mo-bile Technologies (IJIM), 18(12), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i12.49911

Fadda, D., Salis, C., & Vivanet, G. (2022). About the Efficacy of Virtual and Remote La-boratories in STEM Education in Second-ary School: A Second-Order Systematic Review. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 26. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2022-026-fadd

Goff, E. E., Irvin, M. J., Mulvey, K. L., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of Augmented Reality in Informal Science Learning Sites: a Review. Journal of Sci-ence Education and Technology, 27(5), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9734-4

Hassan, J., Devi, A., & Ray, B. (2022). Virtual Laboratories in Tertiary Education: Case Study Analysis by Learning Theories. Ed-ucation Sciences, 12(8), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080554

Iqbal, A. I., Aamir, A., Hammad, A., Hafsa, H., Basit, A., Oduoye, M. O., Anis, M. W., Ah-med, S., Younus, M. I., & Jabeen, S. (2024). Immersive Technologies in Healthcare: An In-Depth Exploration of Virtual Reali-ty and Augmented Reality in Enhancing Patient Care, Medical Education, and Training Paradigms. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241293311

Jiang, H., Zhu, D., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., & Jin, W. (2025). Virtual reality and augmented reality-supported K-12 STEM learning: trends, advantages, and challenges. Edu-cation and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12827–12863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13210-z

Jiang, S., Sung, S. H., Xie, C., Tatar, C., & Huang, X. (2021). Augmented Reality in Science Laboratories: Investigating High School Students’ Navigation Patterns and Their Effects on Learning Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(3), 777–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211038764

Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Educational Opportunities and Challenges in Aug-mented Reality: Featuring Implementa-tions in Physics Education. IEEE Access, 10, 43143–43158. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3166478

Lauer, L., Altmeyer, K., Javaheri, H., Grünerbl, A., Brünken, R., Lukowicz, P., Malone, S., Amiraslanov, O., & Peschel, M. (2020). Real-time visualization of electrical cir-cuit schematics: An augmented reality experiment setup to foster representa-tional knowledge in introductory physics education. The Physics Teacher, 58(7), 518–519. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0002078

Lee, H.-Y., Wu, T.-T., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Lin, C.-J. (2023). Integrating Computa-tional Thinking into Scaffolding Learning: An Innovative Approach to Enhance Sci-ence, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Hands-On Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231211916

Jiang, H., Zhu, D., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., & Jin, W. (2025). Virtual reality and augmented reality-supported K-12 STEM learning: trends, advantages, and challenges. Edu-cation and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12827–12863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13210-z

Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in K–12 education: a review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2020.1737210

Marín Rodriguez, W. J., Calvo Rivera, I. P., An-drade Girón, D. C., Susanibar Ramirez, E. T., Caro Soto, F. G., Ausejo Sanchez, J. L., & Zúñiga Rojas, Z. R. (2023). Artificial In-telligence and Augmented Reality in Higher Education: a systematic review. Data and Metadata, 2, 121. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023121

Mohammadi, K., Fadlallah, J., Bonakala, S., Ayeche, L., Bentria, E. T., Medina, J., & El Mellouhi, F. (2023). MatAR: dynamic augmented reality platform for accessible molecular visualization. Physical Chemis-try Chemical Physics, 25(43), 29415–29423. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cp02435k

Pande, P., & Jepsen, P. M. (2024). Science lab safety goes immersive: An ecological me-dia-comparison study with gender anal-yses assessing iVR’s learning effective-ness. Research and Practice in Technolo-gy Enhanced Learning, 20, 001. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20001

Pandey, A. K., Tyagi, V. V., Salam, P. A., Ahamed, J. U., Said, Z., Juanico, D. E., Tyagi, S. K., Rahman, S., Krismadinata, K., Samykano, M., Reji Kumar, R., Sharma, K., & Kalidasan, B. (2022). Solar Energy Uti-lization Techniques, Policies, Potentials, Progresses, Challenges and Recommen-dations in ASEAN Countries. Sustainabil-ity, 14(18), 11193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811193

Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2018). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education stu-dents’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2

Poo, M. C.-P., Chen, Q., & Lau, Y.-Y. (2023). Are Virtual Laboratories and Remote Labora-tories Enhancing the Quality of Sustaina-bility Education? Education Sciences, 13(11), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111110

Radu, I., Schneider, B., & Hv, V. (2021). Une-qual Impacts of Augmented Reality on Learning and Collaboration During Robot Programming with Peers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interac-tion, 4(CSCW3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432944

Reginald, G. (2023). Teaching and learning us-ing virtual labs: Investigating the effects on students’ self-regulation. Cogent Edu-cation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2172308

Sharma, H., Jaffery, Z. A., & Haque, A. (2018). Solar energy harvesting wireless sensor network nodes: A survey. Journal of Re-newable and Sustainable Energy, 10(2), 023704. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006619

Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2020). Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713

Srinivasa, A. R., Jha, R., Ozkan, T., & Wang, Z. (2020). Virtual reality and its role in im-proving student knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitude in the materials testing la-boratory. International Journal of Me-chanical Engineering Education, 49(4), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419019898824

Tuli, N., Sharma, S., & Mantri, A. (2022). Aug-mented reality in education: a systematic study on technical and usability issues. International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology, 17(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcaet.2022.125048

Ugwoke, B., Corgnati, S. P., Adeleke, A., Pearce, J. M., & Leone, P. (2020). Decentralized Renewable Hybrid Mini-Grids for Rural Communities: Culmination of the IREP Framework and Scale up to Urban Com-munities. Sustainability, 12(18), 7411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187411

Vidak, A., Movre Šapić, I., Mešić, V., & Gomzi, V. (2024). Augmented reality technology in teaching about physics: a systematic re-view of opportunities and challenges. Eu-ropean Journal of Physics, 45(2), 023002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad0e84

Volioti, C., Sotiriou, C., Spiridis, V., Sapounidis, T., Melisidis, K., Zafeiropoulou, M., & Keramopoulos, E. (2022). Using Aug-mented Reality in K-12 Education: An In-dicative Platform for Teaching Physics. Information, 13(7), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13070336

Wibowo, F. C. (2023). Effects of Augmented Reality Integration (ARI) based Model Physics Independent Learning (MPIL) for facilitating 21st-century skills (21-CS). Journal of Technology and Science Educa-tion, 13(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1800

Zatarain‐Cabada, R., Cárdenas‐Sainz, B. A., Chavez‐Echeagaray, M. E., & Barrón‐Estrada, M. L. (2022). Experiences of web‐based extended reality technologies for physics education. Computer Applica-tions in Engineering Education, 31(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22571

Zhang, N., & Liu, Y. (2024). Design and imple-mentation of virtual laboratories for higher education sustainability: a case study of Nankai University. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1322263

Downloads

Published

2025-08-23

How to Cite

Anselmo, C. T. ., Saet, A. B. ., Magleleong, A. P. ., Cagayan, A. J. D. ., & Corpuz, F. T. . (2025). The Potential of Portable AR in Physics Education: A Study on Student Perceptions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(8), 3902-3915. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.14