A Gendered Discourse Analysis of Biological and Trans-Women’s Narratives on Women’s History Month Celebration

Authors

  • Althea B. Montecillo English Language Program, University of Mindanao- Main Campus, Davao City, 8000, Philippines
  • Jessica L. Bonaoy English Language Program, University of Mindanao- Main Campus, Davao City, 8000, Philippines
  • Maico Demi B. Aperocho English Language Program, University of Mindanao- Main Campus, Davao City, 8000, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.09.10

Keywords:

Gender, Identity, Narratives, Inclusion, Feminist discourse, Discourse analysis

Abstract

This research paper presents a comparative analysis of the narratives from biological and trans women regarding the inclusion of trans women in celebrating Women's History Month. Utilizing Labov and Waletzky's Structural Approach to Narrative, the study examines the linguistic nuances in the narratives of ten participants—five trans women advocating for inclusion (Group A) and five biological women expressing reservation about trans women’s inclusion (Group B). The analysis reveals significant differences between the two groups' use of evaluative and referential clauses. Group A's narratives predominantly feature evaluative clauses (59%), reflecting personal emotions and subjective interpretations of their experiences. Group B's narratives are characterized by a higher percentage of referential clauses (65%), focusing on their actual experiences and centering on the factual events. This disparity illustrates how each group's beliefs manifest in their narratives, highlighting the complexities of gender identity and inclusion within feminist discourse. The findings also revealed the importance of identifying referential and evaluative clauses in understanding the stances of trans and biological women, further underscoring the importance of recognizing diverse perspectives in the ongoing conversation about women's rights and the need for a deeper understanding of the implications of these differences in shaping feminist narratives. This study contributes valuable insights to the fields of feminism, linguistics, and social activism, advocating for a more inclusive dialogue that honors the experiences of all women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACLU Pennsylvania (2021). Trans women are women: Avoiding the mistakes of our predecessors. https://www.aclupa.org/en/news/trans-women-are-women-avoiding-mistakes-our-predecessors

American Psychological Association (2024). Understanding transgender people, gen-der identity, and gender expression. https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/transgender-people-gender-identity-gender-expression

Amnesty International. (2024, June 20). Wom-en’s rights - Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/discrimination/womens-rights/

Aperocho, M.D., Aliñabon, G., Camia, K., & Ten-orio, A.J. (2023). Exploring the hate lan-guage: An analysis of discourses against the LGBTQIA+ community. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Jour-nal, 8(3), 729-737. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7901537

Conejos, J. (2025, March 9). Women’s Month and inclusivity: The debate over trans women’s recognition. Daily Tribune. https://tribune.net.ph/2025/03/09/womens-month-and-inclusivity-the-debate-over-trans-womens-recognition

Fiveable. (2024, August 1). William Labov – Intro to Humanities. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/introduction-humanities/william-labov

Fontanella, L., Chulvi, B., Ignazzi, E., Sarra, A., & Tontodimamma, A. (2024). How do we study misogyny in the digital age? A sys-tematic literature review using a compu-tational linguistic approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02978-7

Funders for LGBT Issues. (2021, November 10). Transgender issues - Funders for LGBTQ issues. https://lgbtfunders.org/resources/issues/transgender-issues/

Johnstone, B. (2016). ‘Oral versions of personal experience’: Labovian narrative analysis and its uptake. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(4), 542–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12192

National Women's Month. (n.d.). https://intramuros.gov.ph/gadnwm/

Nicolopoulou, A., Ilgaz, H., Shiro, M., & Hsin, L. B. (2021). “And they had a big, big, very long fight:” The development of evalua-tive language in preschoolers’ oral fic-tional stories told in a peer-group context. Journal of Child Language, 49(3), 522–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000921000209

Nureldeen, W., Alsabatin, H., Eskander, R., & Nasr, W. (n.d.). Investigating evaluative tools in oral personal experience narra-tives of female Egyptian EFL learners. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.903011

Poignant, E. (2021). The cross-lingual shaping of narrative landscapes: involvement in interpreted storytelling. Perspectives, 29(6), 814–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676x.2020.1846571

Respicio, H. (2025, February 14). Legal proce-dures for gender transition from female to male. https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/legal-procedures-for-gender-transition-from-female-to-male

Schoenbaum, N. (2024). Misogyny and the pol-itics of womanhood. American Journal of Law and Equality, 4, 462–497. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00066

Sheikh, A. R., Awan, N. A., & Sheikh, F. R. (2021). The application of Labov’s socio-linguistic model of narrative analysis to a short story The Lottery by Shirley Jack-son. Pakistan Journal of Society, Educa-tion and Language (PJSEL), 8(1), 283–285. https://pjsel.jehanf.com/index.php/journal/article/view/636

Solnit, R. (2020, August 10). Trans women pose no threat to cis women, but we pose a threat to them if we make them outcasts. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/10/trans-rights-feminist-letter-rebecca-solnit

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Montecillo, A. B. ., Bonaoy, J. L. ., & Aperocho, M. D. B. (2025). A Gendered Discourse Analysis of Biological and Trans-Women’s Narratives on Women’s History Month Celebration. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(9), 4341-4350. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.09.10