The Role of Filipino Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs): Challenges and Opportunities in the Philippine Domestic Shipping Decarbonization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.12Keywords:
Maritime Decarbonization, Domestic shipping;, Early Career Ocean Professionals (ECOPs), Sustainable shipping, Policy integration, Capacity building, PhilippinesAbstract
The global shipping sector faces strong decarbonization targets, requiring major emission cuts by 2030, 2040, and net zero by 2050. In the Philippines, domestic shipping is vital for connectivity, making this challenge urgent. This study explored Filipino ECOPs’ roles, awareness, challenges, and opportunities in advancing maritime decarbonization policies and practices.
A mixed-methods design was employed, combining survey responses from ECOPs, semi-structured interviews with participants, and document analysis of national and international maritime policies. Quantitative analysis assessed awareness and readiness levels, while qualitative insights revealed systemic challenges and enabling conditions.
The findings revealed that ECOPs demonstrate moderate to high awareness of environmental aspects of decarbonization (68.6%), yet significant gaps persist in regulatory knowledge, economic understanding, and technical applications (48%). Opportunities for ECOPs’ engagement were rated as “moderate potential” (WM = 3.22), with enabling factors deemed “sufficient” (WM = 2.85). Respondents recognized ECOPs’ capacity to drive technological adoption and policy innovation, though barriers, including restricted access to decision-making, inadequate training, and limited mentorship, pose “major challenges” (WM = 3.15). Policy analysis affirmed national alignment but underscored weak mechanisms for meaningful ECOP participation.
ECOP integration is vital to strengthening the Philippines’ maritime decarbonization agenda. Strategic measures such as advisory councils, capacity-building programs, and curriculum reforms are recommended to empower ECOPs for of sustainable shipping transitions in archipelagic contexts.
Downloads
References
Abu, M. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Re-search in Business and Social Science, 10(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1262
Ajani, A. O., Padonu, N. S., & Tairu, O. A. (2024). Organisational change and work-force performance: A study of selected registered maritime firms. Abuja Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.7118/tkg7mj93
Alamoush, A. S., Ölçer, A. I., & Ballini, F. (2022). Ports’ role in shipping decarboni-sation: A common port incentive scheme for shipping greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3, 100021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2021.100021
Alimen, R. A., Cicero, E., & Cecilia, M. (2019). Maritime command-language: Under-standing its role in the global seafaring profession among maritime youth in the Philippines. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5879/2019.01.005
Arof, A. M. (2018). Decision making model for Ro-Ro short sea shipping operations in archipelagic Southeast Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 34(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.03.005
Bergin, T. (2018). An introduction to data analysis. SAGE. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019397
Bilgili, L. (2023). A systematic review on the acceptance of alternative marine fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Re-views, 182, 113367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113367
Bissias, I. G., Pallis, A. A., & Theotokas, I. N. (2025). Gen Zers and the seafaring pro-fession: A generational approach to en-rolment in merchant marine academies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Ad-vance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024-00355-4
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breakwell, G. M., Wright, D. B., & Barnett, J. (2020). Research methods in psychology. SAGE. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019108#page=358
Buscema, F., Grandi, A., & Colombo, L. (2023). How can the seafarers do it? Qualitative research in psychosocial risks of South Italy’s seafarers. International Maritime Health, 74(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.2023.0006
Caesar, L. D. (2023). Emerging dynamics of training, recruiting and retaining a sus-tainable maritime workforce: A skill re-silience framework. Sustainability, 16(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010239
Cambaliza, M. O. L., Yu, L. E., Latif, M. T., Les-tari, P., & Wu, X. (2023). Regional and ur-ban air quality in Southeast Asia: Mari-time continent. In Handbook of air quality and climate change (pp. 533–591). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2760-9_68
Chang, P.-C., Chou, W.-S., Chiang, W.-S., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2025). Application of quali-tative research to analyze the knowledge and skill requirements for maritime op-erational safety. In 2025 IEEE Underwa-ter Technology (UT) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ut61067.2025.10947377
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quali-tative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). De-signing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, per-ceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Open University Repository. https://oro.open.ac.uk/75449/1/Dawadi%2C%20Shreshta%20and%20Giri%202021.pdf
Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A conver-gent parallel mixed-methods study of
controversial issues in social studies clas-ses: A clash of ideologies. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0038
Department of Energy. (2023). DOE strategic plan 2023–2028: Transforming the Phil-ippine energy sector. DOE.
Department of Energy. (2023). Philippine en-ergy transition roadmap 2023–2050. DOE.
Dixon, J. (2025). Analyzing cyberattacks in the maritime domain using hierarchical clus-tering and descriptive statistics. The Jour-nal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 12(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/48817079
DNV & Singapore Maritime Foundation. (2023, June 8). Study highlights upskilling needs of seafarers in the areas of decarboniza-tion and digitalization. DNV. https://www.dnv.com/news/2023/dnv-and-smf-study-highlights-upskilling-needs-of-seafarers-in-the-areas-of-decarbonization-and-digitalization-244162/
DNV. (2023). Seafarer training and skills for decarbonized shipping. DNV. https://www.dnv.com/publications/seafarer-training-and-skills-for-decarbonized-shipping-235124/
Global Maritime Forum. (2021). The next wave: Green corridors. Global Maritime Forum. https://globalmaritimeforum.org/report/the-next-wave-green-corridors/
Grydehøj, A., & Casagrande, M. (2019). Islands of connectivity: Archipelago relationality and transport infrastructure in Venice Lagoon. Area, 52(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12529
Guerra-García, J. M., Navarro-Barranco, C., Martínez-Laiz, G., Moreira, J., Giráldez, I., Morales, E., Fernández-Romero, A., Florido, M., & Ros, M. (2020). Assessing environmental pollution levels in mari-nas. Science of the Total Environment, 762, 144169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144169
He, S., Wu, X., Wang, J., & Lu, Y. (2025). Ship-ping emission inventory preparation with AIS data: A stratified random sampling method. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 138, 104520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104520
Heirs, S., & Manuel, M. E. (2021). Sustainable maritime career development: A case for maritime education and training (MET) at the secondary level. TransNav: Interna-tional Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 15(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.15.01.08
Hidayat, R., & Pratiwi, S. (2023). Environmen-tal awareness of cadets: The eco-navigator concept in maritime education. Journal of Maritime Studies and National Integration, 7(1), 27–35. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1437237.pdf
International Maritime Organization. (2023). Readiness of low- and zero-carbon marine fuels technology: Full report. GreenVoy-age2050 Project. https://greenvoyage2050.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Readiness-of-Low-Zero-Carbon-Marine-Fuels-Technology-Full-Report-v1.pdf
Issa-Zadeh, S. B. (2025). Decarbonizing sea-port maritime traffic: Finding hope. Mari-time Sustainability, 6(2), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020047
Jia, H., Jiang, L., & Azevedo, P. (2024). Green premium and the role of financial inves-tors in sustainable investment in contain-er shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Re-view, 189, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103658
Joung, T.-H., Kang, S.-G., Lee, J.-K., & Ahn, J. (2020). The IMO initial strategy for re-ducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050. Journal of International Maritime Safety,
Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2019.1707938
Jović, M., Tijan, E., Brčić, D., & Pucihar, A. (2022). Digitalization in maritime transport and seaports: Bibliometric, con-tent and thematic analysis. Journal of Ma-rine Science and Engineering, 10(4), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10040486
Jung, R., Gundlach, S., & Hasselbring, W. (2022). Thematic domain analysis for ocean modeling. Environmental Model-ling & Software, 150, 105323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105323
Kim, H., Lee, D., & Park, S. (2025). Developing a DACUM-integrated competency frame-work for shore-based maritime profes-sionals. Sustainability, 17(14), 6455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146455
Kontovas, C. A. (2020). Integration of air quali-ty and climate change policies in ship-ping: The case of sulphur emissions regu-lation. Marine Policy, 113, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103815
Koukaki, T., & Tei, A. (2020). Innovation and maritime transport: A systematic review. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(3), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.009
Lind, M., Lehmacher, W., & Ward, R. (2023). Maritime decarbonization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39936-7
Mallouppas, G. (2021). Decarbonization in the shipping industry: A review of pathways and technologies. Journal of Marine Sci-ence and Engineering, 9(4), Article 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415
Mao, Z., Ma, A., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Towards carbon neutrality in shipping: Impact of European Union’s emissions trading sys-tem for shipping and China’s response. Ocean & Coastal Management, 249, 107006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.107006
Masodzadeh, P. G., Intlekofer, A., Börjesson, M., & Cariou, P. (2022). A review of bar-riers and solutions for shipping decar-bonization. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 190, 114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114008
Matheus, A. (2024). Human capital develop-ment: Bridging the skills gap in the mari-time administration of Namibia [Master’s thesis, World Maritime University]. The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/2373
Mestemaker, B. van, & Castro, B. G. (2020). De-signing the zero emission vessels of the future: Technologic, economic and envi-ronmental aspects. International Ship-building Progress, 67(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.3233/isp-190276
Mission Innovation. (2023). Green shipping corridors—Reports and approaches. Mis-sion Innovation. https://mission-innovation.net/missions/shipping/green-shipping-corridors/reports/
Monios, J. (2019). Environmental governance in shipping and ports: Sustainability and scale challenges. In Sustainability and scale in maritime governance (pp. 13–29). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819134-7.00002-2
Moros-Daza, A., & Jubiz-Diaz, M. (2024). La-bour force management in maritime ports: A comprehensive systematic litera-ture review. Heliyon, 10(11), e31401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31401
Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Devel-opment of qualitative semi-structured in-terview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Jour-nal, 3(2), 42–52. https://cssrjournal.com/index.php/cssrjournal/article/view/170
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Olaniyi, E. O., Atari, S., & Prause, G. (2018). Maritime energy contracting for clean shipping. Transport and Telecommunica-tion Journal, 19(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2018-0004
Palconit, E. V., & Abundo, M. L. S. (2018). Elec-tric ferry ecosystem for sustainable inter-island transport in the Philippines: A pro-spective simulation for Davao City–Samal Island route. International Journal of Sus-tainable Energy, 38(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2018.1512606
Palconit, E. V., & Lochinvar, M. (2019). Transi-tioning to green maritime transportation in the Philippines: Mapping of potential sites for electric ferry operations. Nan-yang Technological University Repository. https://ntu.edu.sg
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). Mari-time workforce statistics – Seafarer de-mographics. PSA.
Puig, M., Wan, Z., & Notteboom, T. (2023). Green digital shipping corridors: Oppor-tunities and challenges. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11030457
Reuters. (2024, December 3). A sea-change for seafarers as the shipping industry gears up to decarbonise. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/sea-change-seafarers-shipping-industry-gears-up-decarbonise-2024-12-03/
Rokhmah, N., & Susilo, A. (2024). Enhancing global maritime education: A qualitative exploration of post-internship perspec-tives among cadets. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 12(2), 87–102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385451770
Roman, R., Kostianaia, E., Bowes, A., Satterth-waite, E., Savage, C., Edua, X., Fox, N., Boujmil, I., Nocito, E., Santamaria, S. M., Maggioni, T., Ndah, A., Onwubiko, C., Hi-ga, K., Juma, G. A., Mwangi, P. N., Offei-Darko, L., Khatib, L., Elegbede, I., & Oguguah, N. (2024). Building bridges for ocean sustainability: The evolution and impact of the Early Career Ocean Profes-sional (ECOP) Programme. Marine Tech-nology Society Journal, 58(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.4031/mtsj.58.1.4
Satterthwaite, E. V., Robbins, M., Crespo, G. O., Puskic, P. S., Giddens, J., Kostianaia, E., Giron-Nava, A., Elsler, L. G., Rguez-Baron, J. M., & Brodnicke, O. B. (2025). Global priorities for ocean sustainability from Early Career Ocean Professionals. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae201
Scully, S. (2018). The marine people partner-ship: Building a workforce for our ocean industries through ocean literacy. Seman-tic Scholar. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/03bf/dcba82dacfa8b34ed4e885d52a92aeec0896.pdf
Sereda, A. V., Mikhaylichenko, Y. G., Baklanov, P. Y., Kachur, A. N., Lappo, A. D., & Danilova, L. V. (2021). Contribution of an integrated maritime policy to the dia-logue of civilisations: The Asia-Pacific case. Journal of Marine Science and Engi-neering, 9(6), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060610
Shah, B., Andrioti, D., & Jensen, O. C. (2018). Training needs among maritime profes-sionals: A cross-sectional study. Interna-tional Maritime Health, 69(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.2018.0019
Sharma, A., & Nazir, S. (2021). Assessing the technology self-efficacy of maritime in-structors: An explorative study. Educa-tion Sciences, 11(7), 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070342
Tadros, M., Ventura, M., & Soares, C. G. (2023). Review of current regulations, available technologies, and future trends in the green shipping industry. Ocean Engineer-ing, 280, 114670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114670
Thammawan, P., & Bartusevičienė, I. (2024). Perspectives of participants on onboard training: A thematic analysis of qualita-tive interviews. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 8(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2024.2408698
United Nations Conference on Trade and De-velopment. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2023
Vakili, S., & Ölçer, A. I. (2023). Are battery-powered vessels the best solution for the domestic ferry segment? Case study for the domestic ferry segment in the Philip-pines. Energy, 282, 128323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128323
Valdez Banda, O. A., Goerlandt, F., & MacKin-non, S. N. (2023). Digital transformation in maritime education: Curricular and in-stitutional challenges. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00292-7
Van, M., & Wiegmans, B. (2018). Short sea shipping: A statistical analysis of influenc-ing factors on SSS in European countries. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-018-0032-3
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Da-vis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of in-formation technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vozzo, M. L., Christofidis, M., Griffiths, L., Kelly, R., Manion, M. L., Barmand, S., Bolin, J. A., Fuenzalida-Miralles, P. A., Harris, M. L., Issell, A., Kuempel, C. D., Martinez Diaz, M., Murunga, M., Palmer, S. R., Schaefer, N., & Simpson, J. (2025). Advancing ocean sustainability through better science in-tegration: Perspectives of Early Career Ocean Professionals. Frontiers in Ocean Sustainability, 2, Article 1526776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fosoc.2025.1526776
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Develop-ment and validation of a survey instru-ment (AKA) towards attitude, knowledge and application of STEM. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(1), 63–76. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=950660
Wang, P., & Mileski, J. (2018). Strategic mari-time management as a new emerging field in maritime studies. Maritime Busi-ness Review, 3(3), 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-06-2018-0019
Wang, Q., Zhang, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, P. (2023). The use of alternative fuels for maritime decarbonization: Special ma-rine environmental risks and solutions from an international law perspective. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1082453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1082453
Wang, S. H., Wang, X. B., Han, Y., Wang, X. Y., Jiang, H., Duan, J. L., Hua, R., & Zhang, Z. X. (2023). Decarbonizing in maritime transportation: Challenges and opportu-nities. Journal of Transportation Technol-ogies, 13(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.132018
Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., Stewart, R. A., & Sunkpho, J. (2020). Applying mixed methods sequential explanatory design to innovation management. In Lec-ture notes in mechanical engineering (pp. 485–495). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_40
Wiśnicki, B., Wagner, N., & Wołejsza, P. (2021). Critical areas for successful adop-tion of technological innovations in sea shipping – The autonomous ship case study. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1937071
World Bank. (2021). Charting a course for de-carbonizing maritime transport: Sum-mary for policymakers and industry. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/680021617997493409/pdf/Charting-a-Course-for-Decarbonizing-Maritime-Transport.pdf
Xiao, G., Wang, Y., Wu, R., Li, J., & Cai, Z. (2024). Sustainable maritime transport: A review of intelligent shipping technology and green port construction applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineer-ing, 12(10), 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101728
Yildirim, U., Nart, S., Akar, S., Sarialioğlu, S., Toygar, A., Vardar, B., Kaya, S. Ç., & Sari, M. (2024). In-depth exploration of chal-lenges faced by women in the Turkish maritime industry: A qualitative study. Work, 78(2), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-230391
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Emerson Madlangbayan Reyes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
