STS Curriculum Development via Citizen Science on Coastal Plastic Waste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.11.16Keywords:
Curriculum, Citizen science, Module, STS, Plastic waste, Coastal pollutionAbstract
In times of rapid change and persistent learner challenges, continuously updating curriculum materials is essential. The growing problem of plastic pollution stresses the need to integrate citizen science into education to ensure relevance, engagement, and contextual application. This study developed and evaluated a module-based curriculum material that embeds citizen science into the Science, Technology, and Society (STS) curriculum, focusing on the assessment of coastal plastic waste. An initial needs-assessment among STS instructors revealed strong agreement on developing localized, citizen-science-based materials to enhance environmental awareness. Quantitative findings demonstrated high acceptability from both experts and students. Expert evaluation yielded “Fully Acceptable” ratings in all categories, with visuals rated “Very Good (Acceptable)” (Mean = 3.67), indicating strong quality and minor areas for improvement. The Students’ Involvement Index (SII) of 1.07 reflected effective learner engagement, while the Fry Readability Graph placed the module at the college reading level. The Communication Index (CI) ranged from 0 to 0.01, with a CI of 0.01 indicating fair comprehensibility—acceptable but suggesting refinement of scientific terms. Qualitative feedback from students showed that the module was engaging, meaningful, and applicable to real-world issues. Overall, integrating citizen science into the STS curriculum proved to be a viable and impactful strategy for promoting environmental literacy, fostering active participation, and strengthening contextual understanding of coastal pollution among undergraduate learners. Future work should focus on improving visuals and clarity, expanding instructional resources, enhancing teacher training, and conducting broader and long-term implementations to strengthen its educational impact.
Downloads
References
Allf, B.C., Cooper, C., Larson, L. Dunn, R, Futch, S., Sharova, M., Cavalier, D. (2022). Citizen Science as an Ecosystem of Engagement: Implications for Learning and Broadening Participation, BioScience, Volume 72, Is-sue 7, July 2022, Pages 651–663, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac035
Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2021). Students’ attitudes towards science: The contribution of a citizen science project for monitoring coastal water quality and (micro) plastics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(6), 881-893. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.881
Araújo, J. L., Henriques, E. M., & Almeida, A. S. (2022). Citizen-science as a pedagogical tool in chemistry education: Students’ at-titudes and teachers’ perceptions. Inter-disciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841
Aristeidou, M., Lorke, J., & Ismail, N. (2022). Citizen science: Schoolteachers’ motiva-tion, experiences, and recommendations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 2067-2093. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10763-022-10340-z
Brondízio, E., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, A., Ferrari, M.F., Galvin, K., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., Shrestha, U.B. (2021). Locally Based, Re-gionally Manifested, and Globally Rele-vant: Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Values, and Practices for Nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46:1, 481-509. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127
De Veer, D., Drouin, A., Fischer, J., González, C., Holtmann, G., Honorato-Zimmer, D., Ley-ton, A., Núñez, P., Sepúlveda, J.M., Vás-quez, N., Thiel, M. (2022). How do school-children perceive litter? Overlooked in urban but not in natural environments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101781.
Doll, Ronald (1989). Curriculum Improve-ment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fraisl, D., Hager, G., Bedessem, B., Gold, M., Hsing, P.Y., Danielsen, F., Hitchcock, C., Hulbert, J., Piera, J., Spiers, H., Thiel, M., and Haklay, M. (2022). Citizen science in environmental and ecological scienc-es. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2, 64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4
Fry, E. (1968). A Readability Formula that Saves Time. Journal of Reading, April 1968, 513-578.
Godfrey, G., Laplaca, S. B., & Heintz, M. M. (2022). Developing young watershed cit-izen scientists through professional part-nerships in the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 84(4), 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2022. 84.4.202
Gonner, J.V., Masson, T., Kohler, S., Fritsche, I., and Bonn, A. (2024). Citizen science pro-motes knowledge, skills and collective ac-tion to monitor and protect freshwater streams. People Nature, 00,1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10714
Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S., Vohland, K. (2021). What Is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Defini-tion. In: Vohland, K., et al. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2
Hsu, C.-H., Kao, W.-C., & Chai, L. (2023). Revo-lutionizing informal education: Intersec-tion of citizen science and learning theo-ries. Interdisciplinary Journal of Envi-ronmental and Science Education, 19(4), e2319. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/13726
Kibria, M.G., Masuk, N.I., Safayet, R. et al. (2023). Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management. Int J Environ Res 17, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z
Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizen science and its potential for science education. Interna-tional Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2067365
Magwilang, Epiphania B. (2019). Development and Validation of a Community-Based Learning Resource Package in Inorganic Chemistry. International Journal of Hu-manities and Social Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2019), pp. 33-4. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.11.2.3.
Mihai, F.-C.; Gündo˘gdu, S.; Markley, L.A.; Olivelli, A.; Khan, F.R.; Gwinnett, C.; Gutberlet, J.; Reyna-Bensusan, N.; Llanqui-leo-Melgarejo, P.; Meidiana, C.; et al. (2022) Plastic Pollution, Waste Manage-ment Issues, and Circular Economy Op-portunities in Rural Communities. Sus-tainability, 14, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010020
Olipas, C.N.P. (2023). Students’ evaluation of the instructional learning modules for Application Development and Emerging Technologies Course. Puissant, 4, 1074-1089.
Romey, W.D. (1965). Inquiry techniques for teaching science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Rosa, A., Ambarita, A., Sabdaningtyas, L., Yulianti, D. (2021). Development Of Dis-covery Learning-based Science Supple-mentary Textbooks To Improve Stu-dents' Creative Thinking. AIJP, 3(13), 2099-2105. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.897
Sanabria-Z, J., Alfaro-Ponce, B., González Peña, O.I., Terashima-Marín, H., and Ortiz-Bayliss, J.C. (2022). Engagement and So-cial Impact in Tech-Based Citizen Science Initiatives for Achieving the SDGs: A Sys-tematic Literature Review with a Per-spective on Complex Think-ing. Sustainability, 14, 10978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710978
Somerwill, L., Wehn, U. (2022). How to meas-ure the impact of citizen science on envi-ronmental attitudes, behaviour and knowledge? A review of state-of-the-art approaches. Environ Sci Eur 34, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00596-1
Talisayon, V.M. (1983). A feedback-based readability formula for science and mathematics curriculum materials. UP-NISMED Monograph No. 30
UP Open University (1999). Curriculum design and instruction for science education. Dil-iman, Quezon City: UP Open University.
Wichmann, C.S., Fischer, D., Geiger, S.M., Hono-rato-Zimmer, D., Knickmeier, K., Kruse, K., Sundermann, A., and Thiel, M. (2022). Promoting pro-environmental behavior through citizen science? A case study with Chilean schoolchildren on marine plastic pollution, Marine Policy,141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105035.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Alma D. Quiao, Ma. Vanessa O. Balangiao, Khryssha Mae C. Dala, Maria Elma Q. Won, Manuel B. Barquilla

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














