STS Curriculum Development via Citizen Science on Coastal Plastic Waste

Authors

  • Maria Alma D. Quiao Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology / Mindanao State University at Naawan
  • Ma. Vanessa O. Balangiao Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Mindanao State University at Naawan, 9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Khryssha Mae C. Dala Department of Physical Sciences and Mathematics, College of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Mindanao State University at Naawan, 9023 Naawan, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Maria Elma Q. Won Biology Department, College of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Caraga State University, 8600 Butuan City, Philippines
  • Manuel B. Barquilla Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, 9200 Iligan City

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.11.16

Keywords:

Curriculum, Citizen science, Module, STS, Plastic waste, Coastal pollution

Abstract

In times of rapid change and persistent learner challenges, continuously updating curriculum materials is essential. The growing problem of plastic pollution stresses the need to integrate citizen science into education to ensure relevance, engagement, and contextual application. This study developed and evaluated a module-based curriculum material that embeds citizen science into the Science, Technology, and Society (STS) curriculum, focusing on the assessment of coastal plastic waste. An initial needs-assessment among STS instructors revealed strong agreement on developing localized, citizen-science-based materials to enhance environmental awareness. Quantitative findings demonstrated high acceptability from both experts and students. Expert evaluation yielded “Fully Acceptable” ratings in all categories, with visuals rated “Very Good (Acceptable)” (Mean = 3.67), indicating strong quality and minor areas for improvement. The Students’ Involvement Index (SII) of 1.07 reflected effective learner engagement, while the Fry Readability Graph placed the module at the college reading level. The Communication Index (CI) ranged from 0 to 0.01, with a CI of 0.01 indicating fair comprehensibility—acceptable but suggesting refinement of scientific terms. Qualitative feedback from students showed that the module was engaging, meaningful, and applicable to real-world issues. Overall, integrating citizen science into the STS curriculum proved to be a viable and impactful strategy for promoting environmental literacy, fostering active participation, and strengthening contextual understanding of coastal pollution among undergraduate learners. Future work should focus on improving visuals and clarity, expanding instructional resources, enhancing teacher training, and conducting broader and long-term implementations to strengthen its educational impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allf, B.C., Cooper, C., Larson, L. Dunn, R, Futch, S., Sharova, M., Cavalier, D. (2022). Citizen Science as an Ecosystem of Engagement: Implications for Learning and Broadening Participation, BioScience, Volume 72, Is-sue 7, July 2022, Pages 651–663, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac035

Araújo, J. L., Morais, C., & Paiva, J. C. (2021). Students’ attitudes towards science: The contribution of a citizen science project for monitoring coastal water quality and (micro) plastics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(6), 881-893. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.881

Araújo, J. L., Henriques, E. M., & Almeida, A. S. (2022). Citizen-science as a pedagogical tool in chemistry education: Students’ at-titudes and teachers’ perceptions. Inter-disciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(2), e2271. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11841

Aristeidou, M., Lorke, J., & Ismail, N. (2022). Citizen science: Schoolteachers’ motiva-tion, experiences, and recommendations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 2067-2093. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10763-022-10340-z

Brondízio, E., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bates, P., Carino, J., Fernández-Llamazares, A., Ferrari, M.F., Galvin, K., Reyes-García, V., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Samakov, A., Shrestha, U.B. (2021). Locally Based, Re-gionally Manifested, and Globally Rele-vant: Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Values, and Practices for Nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46:1, 481-509. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127

De Veer, D., Drouin, A., Fischer, J., González, C., Holtmann, G., Honorato-Zimmer, D., Ley-ton, A., Núñez, P., Sepúlveda, J.M., Vás-quez, N., Thiel, M. (2022). How do school-children perceive litter? Overlooked in urban but not in natural environments, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101781.

Doll, Ronald (1989). Curriculum Improve-ment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Fraisl, D., Hager, G., Bedessem, B., Gold, M., Hsing, P.Y., Danielsen, F., Hitchcock, C., Hulbert, J., Piera, J., Spiers, H., Thiel, M., and Haklay, M. (2022). Citizen science in environmental and ecological scienc-es. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2, 64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4

Fry, E. (1968). A Readability Formula that Saves Time. Journal of Reading, April 1968, 513-578.

Godfrey, G., Laplaca, S. B., & Heintz, M. M. (2022). Developing young watershed cit-izen scientists through professional part-nerships in the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 84(4), 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2022. 84.4.202

Gonner, J.V., Masson, T., Kohler, S., Fritsche, I., and Bonn, A. (2024). Citizen science pro-motes knowledge, skills and collective ac-tion to monitor and protect freshwater streams. People Nature, 00,1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10714

Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S., Vohland, K. (2021). What Is Citizen Science? The Challenges of Defini-tion. In: Vohland, K., et al. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_2

Hsu, C.-H., Kao, W.-C., & Chai, L. (2023). Revo-lutionizing informal education: Intersec-tion of citizen science and learning theo-ries. Interdisciplinary Journal of Envi-ronmental and Science Education, 19(4), e2319. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/13726

Kibria, M.G., Masuk, N.I., Safayet, R. et al. (2023). Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management. Int J Environ Res 17, 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z

Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizen science and its potential for science education. Interna-tional Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1120-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2067365

Magwilang, Epiphania B. (2019). Development and Validation of a Community-Based Learning Resource Package in Inorganic Chemistry. International Journal of Hu-manities and Social Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2019), pp. 33-4. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijhss.11.2.3.

Mihai, F.-C.; Gündo˘gdu, S.; Markley, L.A.; Olivelli, A.; Khan, F.R.; Gwinnett, C.; Gutberlet, J.; Reyna-Bensusan, N.; Llanqui-leo-Melgarejo, P.; Meidiana, C.; et al. (2022) Plastic Pollution, Waste Manage-ment Issues, and Circular Economy Op-portunities in Rural Communities. Sus-tainability, 14, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010020

Olipas, C.N.P. (2023). Students’ evaluation of the instructional learning modules for Application Development and Emerging Technologies Course. Puissant, 4, 1074-1089.

Romey, W.D. (1965). Inquiry techniques for teaching science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Rosa, A., Ambarita, A., Sabdaningtyas, L., Yulianti, D. (2021). Development Of Dis-covery Learning-based Science Supple-mentary Textbooks To Improve Stu-dents' Creative Thinking. AIJP, 3(13), 2099-2105. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.897

Sanabria-Z, J., Alfaro-Ponce, B., González Peña, O.I., Terashima-Marín, H., and Ortiz-Bayliss, J.C. (2022). Engagement and So-cial Impact in Tech-Based Citizen Science Initiatives for Achieving the SDGs: A Sys-tematic Literature Review with a Per-spective on Complex Think-ing. Sustainability, 14, 10978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710978

Somerwill, L., Wehn, U. (2022). How to meas-ure the impact of citizen science on envi-ronmental attitudes, behaviour and knowledge? A review of state-of-the-art approaches. Environ Sci Eur 34, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00596-1

Talisayon, V.M. (1983). A feedback-based readability formula for science and mathematics curriculum materials. UP-NISMED Monograph No. 30

UP Open University (1999). Curriculum design and instruction for science education. Dil-iman, Quezon City: UP Open University.

Wichmann, C.S., Fischer, D., Geiger, S.M., Hono-rato-Zimmer, D., Knickmeier, K., Kruse, K., Sundermann, A., and Thiel, M. (2022). Promoting pro-environmental behavior through citizen science? A case study with Chilean schoolchildren on marine plastic pollution, Marine Policy,141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105035.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Quiao, M. A. D., Balangiao, M. V. O., Dala, K. M. C., Won, M. E. Q., & Barquilla, M. B. (2025). STS Curriculum Development via Citizen Science on Coastal Plastic Waste. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(11), 5550-5561. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.11.16