Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: Implications for Distance Education Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.37Keywords:
Online learning, Distance education, Innovation, Graduate school, Technology acceptance modelAbstract
Online learning greatly supports the offering of distance education by providing innovative platforms. This study examined graduate students’ perceptions of online learning as a basis for offering distance education. It utilized the concurrent mixed method. The respondents of the study are the graduate school students at La Consolacion University, Philippines, enrolled during the 2nd trimester of the school year 2022–2023. The quantitative results of the study have a weighted mean of 3.71, which showed strong agreement on online learning activities, strategies, media, and support instruments. Qualitative analysis revealed three perceived advantages: innovative engagement, convenience, and flexible scheduling. It was then concluded that the study highlighted that online learning could be an effective and innovative practice for graduate school students. Constant efforts must be made to improve the online learning environment in response to student feedback and to alter educational paradigms to preserve the high standard of online education. The findings imply that distance education programs should continue enhancing online learning activities, strategies, and tools to sustain positive student perceptions. With convenience, flexibility, and innovative engagement as key advantages, institutions must invest in digital resources, faculty training, and support systems while ensuring continuous feedback to maintain quality and relevance in graduate education.
Downloads
References
Ally, M. (2006). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 1(2), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8299-3_8
Arslan, H., Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2020). Adaptation of the Student Expectations of Online Learning Survey Revised (SEOLSR) into Turkish. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v11i2.238
Austin, D., & Mescia, N. D. (2004). Strategies to incorporate active learning into online teaching. Retrieved March 4, 2004.
Campbell, L. (2004). What does the “e” stand for? Department of Science and Mathe-matics Education, The University of Mel-bourne.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Educa-tion, 123, 53–64.
Davletova, A. K., Maykibayeva, E. K., Rakhim-zhanova, M. B., Kasymova, A. K., & Ku-sainov, A. A. (2016). Didactic potential of multimedia-technology in the develop-ment of students' informational culture. Indian Journal of Science and Technolo-gy, 9(12), 32–63.
DuVernet, A., Poteet, M., Parker, B., Conley, K., & Herman, A. (2017). Overview of results from the 2016 income and employment survey. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 54(3).
Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2013). Distance education. In Handbook of Re-search on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 361–401). Routledge.
Huang, Y. M., & Chiu, P. S. (2015). The effec-tiveness of a meaningful learning‐based evaluation model for context‐aware mo-bile learning. British Journal of Educa-tional Technology, 46(2), 437–447.
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533–541.
Kara, M., Erdogdu, F., Kokoç, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2019). Challenges faced by adult learn-ers in online distance education: A litera-ture review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5–22.
Kraiger, K., Fisher, S., Grossman, R., Mills, M. J., & Sitzmann, T. (2022). Online IO graduate education: Where are we and where should we go? Industrial and Organiza-tional Psychology, 15(2), 151–171.
Kroll, T., & Neri, M. (2009). Designs for mixed methods research. In Mixed Methods Re-search for Nursing and the Health Scienc-es (pp. 31–49).
Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Re-constructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Tech-nologies in Learning (iJET), 15(13), 4–21.
Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research de-sign. Archives of Business Review, 8(11), 180–193.
Nagra, G. (2014). How to gain students' atten-tion in an online learning course. CommLab India.
Olayemi, O. M., Adamu, H., & Olayemi, K. J. (2021). Perception and readiness of stu-dents towards online learning in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Percep-tion, 3(1), 4–21.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effec-tiveness and student learning outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
Phillips, J. M. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77–83.
Ragan, L. C. (1999). Good teaching is good teaching: An emerging set of guiding principles and practices for the design and development of distance education. Cause/Effect, 22(1), 20–24.
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research para-digms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1–5.
Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., & Ljubojevic, D. (2017). The effects of inte-grating social learning environment.
Roach, V., & Lemasters, L. (2006). Satisfaction with online learning: A comparative de-scriptive study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 317–332.
Santosh, S., & Panda, S. (2016). Sharing of knowledge among faculty in a mega open university. Open Praxis, 8(3), 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.317
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance educa-tion in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580852.pdf
Shin, H., & Kang, J. (2020). Reducing perceived health risk to attract hotel customers in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Focused on technology innovation for social distanc-ing and cleanliness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102664.
Tamrat, W., & Teferra, D. (2020). Private high-er education in Ethiopia: Risks, stakes and stocks. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 677–691.
Torun, E. D. (2020). Online distance learning in higher education: E-learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 191–208.
Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online learning in high-er education: A review of research on in-teractions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Infor-mation, 3(2), 241–280.
Wieser, D., & Seeler, J. M. (2018). Online, not distance education: The merits of
collaborative learning in online educa-tion. In The Disruptive Power of Online Education (pp. 125–146). Emerald Pub-lishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-325-620181008
Xu, D., & Xu, Y. (2019). The promises and lim-its of online higher education: Under-standing how distance education affects access, cost, and quality. American En-terprise Institute.
Zin, K. S. L. T., Kim, S., Kim, H. S., & Feyissa, I. F. (2023). A study on technology ac-ceptance of digital healthcare among old-er Korean adults using extended TAM (Extended Technology Acceptance Mod-el). Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 42.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Virginia Natividad-Franco, Joseph D. Espino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
