Assessment on the Effectiveness of Pseudo-Narcotics Training Aids to Candidate Coast Guard Detection Dogs

Authors

  • Joselle Luz A. Abas Philippine Merchant Marine Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.36

Keywords:

Philippine Coast Guard K9 Training, K9 Narcotics Detection, K9 Scent Detection Accuracy, Pseudo-Narcotics, Real Narcotics

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of pseudo-narcotic training aids in replicating the scent profiles of real narcotic substances, specifically marijuana and methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu), for training Coast Guard K9 narcotics detection dogs. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining performance evaluations of ten handler-dog teams with focus group discussions involving instructors, evaluators, and handlers.

Findings revealed that dogs trained with pseudo-narcotics achieved perfect detection rates in most conditions and performed comparably to those trained with real substances, even in distraction-rich environments. However, real narcotics generally produced faster detection time and fewer false indications. Statistical analysis confirmed differences in detection speed without distractions, but no significant differences under distracting conditions. Thematic analysis highlighted six key factors: use in refresher training, the need for initial imprinting with real substances, legal and logistical benefits, environmental influences, scent differentiation challenges, and the role of evolving training technologies.

The study concludes that pseudo-narcotics are effective adjuncts for maintenance and broad deployment. However, they cannot fully substitute for real narcotics in foundational imprinting. This study provides evidence that pseudo-narcotics can complement, but not fully replace, real narcotics in Coast Guard K9 training.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adebimpe, D. (2014). Methods of Producing Pseudo-scent Compositions of Narcotic Materials and Compositions Thereof. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140311218A1/en

Caldicott, L. Pike, T. W., Zulch, H.E., Mills, D.S., Williams, F.J., Elliker, K.R., Hutchings, B., and Wilkinson, A. (2024). Odor generali-zation and detection dog training. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s1007 1-024-01907-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-024-01907-0

Daily Tribune. (2024, November 21). PPA turns over K9 Academy to Coast Guard. https://tribune.net.ph/2024/11/20/ppa-turns- over-k9-academy-to-coast-guard

Dela Cruz, RC. (2024, November 21). PCG- PPA K9 academy to boost PH port, coastal se-curity. Philippine News Agency. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1238446

Gesulgon, J. (2019). Establishment of a K9 Training Center for Law Enforcement Agencies of the Philippines. (Unpublished Policy Paper). Philippine Public Safety College.

Jantorno, G. M., Xavier, C. H., & de Melo, C.

B. (2020). Narcotic detection dogs: An over-view of high-performance animals. Ciên-cia Rural, 50(10), e20191010. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20191010

Koech, G. K., & Mulu, F. (2023). Use of Explo-sive Detection Dogs in Countering Impro-vised Devices in Security Operations. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Stud-ies, 7(9), 167-176.

Macias, S., Harper, R., Furton, K. (2008). A comparison of real versus simulated con-traband VOCs for reliable detector dog training utilizing SPME-GC-MS. VOC repli-cation and canine detection reliability. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279594627

Paltzer, S. (n.d.). The dogs of war: The U.S. Army’s use of canines in WWII. Army His-tory Center.https://armyhistory.org/the-dogs-of-war-the-u-s-armys-use-of-canines-in-wwii/

Philippine Coast Guard Auxiliary. (2023). Evaluation report on narcotics detection training. https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1200339

Philippine Coast Guard K9 Force. (2023). Coast Guard K9 Force Operations Manual. (Un-published internal manual).

Republic Act No. 9165. (2002). Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2002/ra9165_2002.html

Rice, S., & Koziel, J. A. (2015). The relationship between chemical concentration and odor activity value explains the incon-sistency in making a comprehensive sur-rogate scent training tool representative of illicit drugs. Forensic science interna-tional, 257, 257-270.

Simon, A., Lazarowski, L., Singletary, M., Bar-row, J., Van Arsdale, K., Angle, T., … Giles, K. (2020, June 5). A review of the types of training aids used for canine detection training. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7,313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00313

Sokolenko, S. P., Yagupolskii, Y. L., & Ivanov,

D. (2020). Narcotic drug smell mimics. Science and Innovation, 16(5), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine16.05.071

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Abas, J. L. A. (2025). Assessment on the Effectiveness of Pseudo-Narcotics Training Aids to Candidate Coast Guard Detection Dogs. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(10), 5358-5365. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.36