Teachers’ Readiness in Phonemic Awareness Instructions and the Reading Performance of the Grade II Pupils Zone 4, Division of Zambales

Authors

  • Lovelyn Martin Abay Department of Education, Division of Zambales, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.26

Keywords:

Phonemic Awareness, Teacher Readiness, Reading Performance, Early Literacy, Grade II Pupils, Instructional Strategies, Zambales Division

Abstract

Before a child learns to read printed materials, they need to become aware of how sounds in words work. Thus, a child needs to be phonemically aware to become a reader. One factor that could be associated with this is the readiness of teachers in phonemic awareness concepts before they teach for the pupils to spontaneously acquire phonemic awareness.   This study of teachers’ readiness in PA (Phonemic Awareness) instructions’ relationship to reading performance of Grade 2 pupils builds upon this body of research by utilizing descriptive correlational research. This study examined further the relationship of the eighteen (18) teacher respondents’ profile and their readiness in PA Instructions which revealed that highest educational attainment variable and attendance to seminars, trainings and workshops focusing on phonemic awareness is moderately associated with their readiness in PA instructions. Participants of the study are 497 Grade 2 pupils from nine (9) schools in Zone 4 Division of Zambales. Results revealed an improvement in the reading performance of the pupil participants, through a PHIL-IRI (Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Test- Oral Reading Test), as a result of highlighted readiness in PA Instructions.   The conclusion that there is a significant relationship of the teachers’ readiness in PA instructions and reading performance of Grade 2 pupils offer important information for teachers, educational leaders and other professionals to conduct professional development activities such as seminars, training, and workshops to ensure that the teachers are updated to the needs of the present generation of learners. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Think-ing and learning about print. Cam-bridge,MA:MIT Press.

April Klazema (2014). Types of Quantitative Research for Students and Researchers. Retrieved from https://blog.udemy.com/types-of-quantitative-research/ on June 9,2014

Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kinder-garten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 49–66.

Becker, A (2013) The History of Phonemic Awareness Pedagogy.Retrieved from https//prezi.com on Dece.17,2013

Bonnie B. Armbruster, Ph.D., Fran Lehr and Jean Osborn, M. Ed., Champaign (2003) Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read.p.2

Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruc-tion. Annals of Dyslexia,51, 97-120.

Chapman, M. L. (2003). Phonemic awareness: Clarifying what we know. Literacy Teach-ing and Learning: An International Jour-nal of Early Reading and Writing, 7, 91-114. Retrieved from http://www.readingrecovery.org/sections/home/LTLVol7No1_2.asp on March 25,2005.

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schus-ter, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruc-tion helps children learn to read: Evi-dence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarter-ly, 36(3), 250–287.

Evaluation System (2009) Foundation of Read-ing (90) – Practice Test Massachusetts

USA: Pearson Education,Inc. Retrieved from www.mtel.nesinc.com on January

, 2016

Floyd J. Fowler, Jr. (2014). Survey Research Methods. Retrieved from https//books.google.com.ph

Griffith, P., & Olson, M. (1992). Phonemic awareness helps beginning readers break the code. The Reading Teacher, 45(7), 516-523.

Honig, B. (2001). Teaching our children to read: The components of an effective, comprehensivereading program (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hoover Wesley A.(2002) The Importance of Phonemic Awareness in Learning to Read. SEDL Letter Volume XIV, Number 3, December 2002, Putting Reading First

International Reading Association. (1998). Phonemic awareness and the teaching of reading: A position statement from the board of directors of the internation-al reading association (Brochure). Cun-ningham, H.W., Cunningham, P.M.,Hoffman, J.V., and Yopp, H.K: Au-thors.

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Ed-ucational Psychology, 80, 437-447.

Nalzaro, L (2012). Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. Retrieved from https//slideshare.net on June 9,2012

National English Proficiency Program (NEPP) Modules 1-3 (May 2006) from the De-partment of Education

National Reading Panel. (April, 2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based As-sessment of the Scientific Research Liter-ature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Neuman, S.B., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S.B. (2000). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Educa-tion of Young Children.

Pressley, M., & Rankin, J. (1994). More about whole language methods of reading in-struction for students at risk for early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Re-search & Practice,9(3), 157-168.

Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of pri-mary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96,363-384.

Smith S. B., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1998). Phonological awareness:

Instructional and curricular basics and impli-cations. In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame'enui (eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learn-ing needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Smith,WP(2015). Effective Teaching Strategies for Teaching Phonemic Aware-ness.Retrieved from https//www.k12 reader.com

Snider, V. E. (1995). A primer on phonemic awareness: What it is, why it’s important, and how to teach it. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 443–455.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individu-al differences in the acquisition of litera-cy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Strickland, D. (March, 1998). What’s basic in beginning reading? Finding common ground. Educational Leadership, 55(6), 6-10

Uhry, J. K. (1999). Phonological awareness and reading: Theory, research, and instruc-tional activities. In J. R. Birsh (Ed.), Multi-sensory teaching of basic language skills (pp. 63–84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Yopp, H. K. (1992). Developing phonemic awareness in young children. The Read-ing Teacher, 45(9), 696-703.

Yopp, H. K. (1995). A test for assessing pho-nemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 49(1), 22.

Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting Phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130-143.

Clara, Youd et.al (2013), Defining Parental

Article within a journal supplement:

Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard T, LoConte

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Abay, L. M. (2025). Teachers’ Readiness in Phonemic Awareness Instructions and the Reading Performance of the Grade II Pupils Zone 4, Division of Zambales. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(10), 5165-5173. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.10.26