Smart-Access Community Information System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.12.33Keywords:
Smart Access Community Information System (SACIS), Community awareness, Digital literacy, Service delivery, Accessibility, Accuracy, Efficiency, Transparency, Digital infrastructure, Adoption challenges, Sustainable use, Resistance to change, Public engagementAbstract
This research study looked into the prospective implementation of the Smart-Access Community Information System (SACIS). The respondents comprised 20 licensed local geodetic engineers who are duly registered with the Geodetic Engineers of the Philippines (GEP), as well as 30 Geodetic Engineering students from Baguio Central School. The study utilized a developmental-descriptive research design in conjunction with a descriptive survey approach to obtain comprehensive insights into stakeholder perceptions. Data were primarily collected through a structured questionnaire, which was carefully adapted and refined to ensure its validity, clarity, and appropriateness for addressing the research objectives. Based on the data collected, the study revealed several key findings: The current level of awareness regarding Smart Access to Land Information was assessed and established. Findings indicate that the Smart-Access platform is highly effective in terms of accessibility, accuracy, efficiency, and transparency. Moreover, the potential challenges that may arise during the future implementation of the Smart Access Community Information System (SACIS) are perceived as very much serious by the respondents, underscoring the need for careful planning and mitigation strategies to ensure successful deployment. The study concludes that the community has moderate awareness of Smart Access Community Information System (SACIS), understanding its objectives and benefits but showing varied knowledge across its purpose, services, and impact. The Smart-Access platform is considered highly effective, improving accessibility, accuracy, efficiency, and transparency compared to traditional methods, and is recognized for enhancing service delivery. However, respondents also perceive potential challenges—such as limited digital infrastructure, low digital literacy, and resistance to change.
Downloads
References
Anjoga, H., Nyeko, S., & Kituyi, M. (2017). A Framework for Usability of e-Government Services in Developing Countries. Journal of Accounting and Au-diting: Research & Practice, 2017, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5171/2017.313796
Atzmanstorfer, K., Resl, R., Eitzinger, A., & Izurieta, X. (2014). The GeoCitizen-approach: community-based spatial plan-ning – an Ecuadorian case study. Cartography and Geographic In-formation Science, 41(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2014.890546
Bélanger, F. and Carter, L. (2005) Trust and Risk in e-Government Adoption. Proceed-ings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, 11-14 Au-gust 2005, 1955-1964. - References - Sci-entific Research Publishing. (2015). Scirp.org. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1470096
Jones, S., Syder, A., Blencowe, A., & Constant, N. (2024, October 21). Participatory Ap-proaches to Conservation with Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples: An Open Access Toolkit. ResearchGate; un-known. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385099105_Participatory_Approaches_to_Conservation_with_Local_Communities_and_Indigenous_Peoples_An_Open_Access_Toolkit
Campbell, J., & Shin, M. (2011). Essentials of Geographic Information Systems. Saylor Foundation. https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/textbooks/Essentials%20of%20Geographic%20Information%20Systems.pdf
Claudio U. Ciborra & Diego D. Navarra (2005). Good governance, development theory, and aid policy: Risks and challenges of e government in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 141 159. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1002/itdj.20008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of infor-mation systems success: A ten-year up-date. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://eli.johogo.com/Class/p7.pdf
Development Academy of the Philippines. (n.d.). Guagua Geographic Information System (GGIS). https://coe-psp.dap.edu.ph/compendium-innovation/guagua-geographic-information-system-ggis/
Dhaoui, I. (2021). E-government for sustaina-ble development: Evidence from MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2070-2099. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8107409/pdf/13132_2021_Article_791.pdf
Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and so-cial inclusion in public services: A qualita-tive analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustain-able governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2908
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the cross-roads. Government Information Quarter-ly, 35(4), 611–619. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181?needAccess=true
Hasan, M. H., Zulkarnain, S. I., & Nordin, N. (2025). An empirical study on e-government intentions and adoption: Mediating effects of Bangladeshi citizens’ attitudes and trust in government. Inter-national Journal of Research and Innova-tion in Social Science, 9(1), 762–784. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-1/762-784.pdf
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text. Sage Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/implementing-and-managing-egovernment/toc#_
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information sys-tems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/201168946_Design_Science_in_Information_Systems_Research
Huisman, O., & de By, R. A. (2009). Principles of Geographic Information Systems. The International Institute for Geo- infor-mation Science & Observation(ITC). Netherland. https://gdmc.nl/oosterom/PoGISHyperlinked.pdf
Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in govern-ment: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quar-terly, 32(4), 363–368. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti-cle/abs/pii/S0740624X15001069?via%3Dihub
Jiang, Y., Yang, L., Wei, X., & Zhang, X. (2024). The impact of government digital trans-formation on land use efficiency: Evi-dence from China. Land, 13(12), 2080. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2080
Kirui, J., & Kemei, R. (2014). User satisfaction with geospatial information systems in resource management: Evidence from Kenya. International Journal of Geoin-formatics, 10(3), 25–34. https://ijg.geoinfojournal.org/index.php/ijg/article/view/231
Land Management Bureau. (n.d.). About LAMS. Department of Environment and Natu-ral Resources. https://lmb.gov.ph/programs-projects/land-administration-and-management-system/about-lams/
Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization ini-tiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), Arti-cle 2818. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2818
Manuel S. Enverga University Foundation. (2024). A GIS-based land use and land cover mapping project for informed deci-sion-making in Barangay San Miguel, Al-aminos, Laguna. https://mseuf.edu.ph/research/read/2355
Mete Yildiz (2007). E government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646 665. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti-cle/pii/S0740624X07000056?via%3Dihub
Michael Schmandt, Ph.D.(2012).GIS Commons: An Introductory Textbook on Geographic Information Systems. Sacramento State University. https://giscommons.org/
Mutiarin, D., Misran, M., Rukmana, N. S., & Ningtyas, T. (2024). Bridging the digital divide through digital infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and De-velopment, 8(8), Article 6817. https://systems.enpress-publish-er.com/index.php/jipd/article/viewFile/6817/3735
Mutula, S., & van Brakel, P. (2006). E-readiness of SMEs in the ICT sector in Botswana with respect to information access. The Electronic Library, 24(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470610671240
National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA). (n.d.). Philippine GeoPortal. https://www.geoportal.gov.ph/
Netshirando, N., Clement, A., Manjon, J., & Crutzen, N. (2022). Citizen perceptions of digital transformation in local municipali-ties: The case of South Africa. South Afri-can Journal of Information Management. https://sajim.co.za/index.php/sajim/article/view/1804/2993
Pangaribuan, A. A. (2019). The challenges of e-government implementation in develop-ing countries. Journal of Public Admin-istration Studies. 4(1), 260–279.
Philippine Management Review, Vol. 27, 57-78 (2020). Determining e-Government Trust: An Information Systems Success Model Approach to the Philippines’ Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), the So-cial Security System (SSS), and the Bu-reau of Internal Revenue (BIR). Universi-ty of the Philippines Cesar E.A. Virata School of Business. https://pmr.upd.edu.ph/index.php/pmr/article/view/342/341
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. https://books.google.com.au/books?id=9U1K5LjUOwEC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Sarangam, A. (2021). Digital accessibility in government sector websites and services. International Journal of Core Engineering & Management, 6(11), 153 159. https://ijcem.in/wp-content/uploads/DIGITAL-ACCESSIBILITY-IN-GOVERNMENT-SECTOR-WEBSITES-AND-SERVICES.pdf
Sieber, R. E. (2006). Public participation geo-graphic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the As-sociation of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507. https://dusk.geo.orst.edu/virtual/2007/sieber2006.pdf
Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2020). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Sustainabil-ity, 12(3), 899. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/3/899
Taufiqurokhman, T., Satispi, E., Andriyani, L., Usni, U., & Ulum, M. (2025). Digital gov-ernance models in developing countries and the effectiveness of public services. Citizen and Government Review, 2(2),172-189. https://cjrjournal.com/index.php/cgr/article/view/19/29
United States Agency for International Devel-opment (USAID). (n.d.). Mobile Applica-tions to Secure Tenure (MAST). https://www.landgovernance.org/assets/Jeffrey-Euwema.pdf and https://landportal.org/sites/default/files/imported_files/landlinks_1474.pdf
Wickramasinghe, M. (2025). Determinants of citizen awareness and participation in smart city initiatives: Insights from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Innova-tion in Enterprise Systems, 9(1), 29–40. https://ijies.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/IJIES/article/view/657/125
Winarni, D., Fathan, I. N., & Arofah, R. U. (2023). Analysis of the level of e government implementation and fac-tors that influence it (Empirical study of regional government in Central Java). Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(3), 237 251. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/JurnalAkuntansi/article/view/30288
Zachariah, S. (2025). Digitalization and inno-vation in land management: A case study of Botswana’s land administration sys-tem. PM World Journal, XIV(Issue III, March). https://pmworldjournal.com/article/digitalization-and-innovation-in-land-management
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meichee B. Ababa-En, Kevin Christopher D. Jacildone, Shelly Mae A. Killase, Judith S. Mantias, Marc Zedric F. Mauricio, Romeo C. Ruiz, Engr. Criselda S. Felix
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
