How Crowdfunding Shapes Venture, Product and Market Decisions: A Multiple Case Study of Philippine-based Microenterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
Crowdfunding, Venture creation, Microenterprises, Social capitalAbstract
Microenterprises face constraints in accessing capital, markets, and entrepreneurial support systems, which limit their capacity for venture creation and growth. Crowdfunding emerged as an alternative mechanism with the potential to address these challenges; yet its role in shaping venture creation decisions remains underexplored in emerging economies. Using an exploratory, qualitative, multiple-case approach, this study examines how crowdfunding influences the venture-creation and decision-making processes of Philippine-based microentrepreneurs. Drawing on eight cases of successfully crowdfunded enterprises, the study investigates entrepreneurs’ motivations for participating in crowdfunding, their experiences before, during, and after campaigns, and the critical transition points that shape venture outcomes.
Findings demonstrate that crowdfunding is a market-validation tool rather than a financial tool. While funding initially motivates participation, crowdfunding’s most significant benefits are non-financial: market and consumer insight, product feedback, brand visibility, and access to broader networks. More importantly, these resources inform decisions to launch new ventures, develop new products, enter new markets, or pivot strategically, enabling low-risk market experimentation prior to full venture commitment. Building on these findings, the study refines crowdfunding entrepreneurial frameworks by extending commitment beyond new venture creation to include product- and market-level decisions, and contributes an alternative venture creation pathway for resource-constrained microenterprises.
Downloads
References
Agrawal, A. K., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding (No. w16820). National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1086/674021
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwien-bacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tap-ping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
Beverland, M., & Lindgreen, A. (2010). What makes a good case study? A positivist re-view of qualitative case research pub-lished in Industrial Marketing Manage-ment, 1971–2006. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.09.005
Bhave, M. P. (1994). A process model of entre-preneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0
Cai, W., Polzin, F., & Stan, E. (2021). Crowd-funding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 162, 120412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120412
Cefis, E. & Marsili, O. (2011). Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 473-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0210-4
Cosh, A., Cumming, D., & Hughes, A. (2009). Outside enterpreneurial capital. The Eco-nomic Journal, 119(540), 1494-1533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02270.x
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual frame-work for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Man-agement Review, 10(4), 696-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
Doce, L. J., & Ching, M. R. (2021). Perceptions to Crowdfunding Adoption in Philippines: A Study on MSMEs. In PACIS (p. 141). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2021/141
Gordon, S. R. (2012). Action's place in the ven-ture creation process. In Entrepreneurial Action (Vol. 14, pp. 161-205). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540(2012)0000014009
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc.
Gupta, R., Pandey, R., & Sebastian, V. J. (2021). International Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO): A bibliometric overview of schol-arly research. Journal of Business Re-search, 125, 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.005.
Ito, Y., & Shahnaz, D. (2019). Road map for strengthening social entrepreneurship in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/514471/adb-brief-112-social-entrepreneurship-road-map-philippines.pdf
Junge, L. B., Laursen, I. C., & Nielsen, K. R. (2022). Choosing crowdfunding: Why do entrepreneurs choose to engage in crowdfunding?. Technovation, 111, 102385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102385
Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., & Whit-canack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analy-sis? Testing differential models of cogni-tive style on entrepreneurial self–efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439-453. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.x.
Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal pro-tocol analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423365
Lehner, O. M., Grabmann, E., & Ennsgraber, C. (2015). Entrepreneurial implications of crowdfunding as alternative funding source for innovations. Venture Capital, 17(1-2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2015.1037132
Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2001). Char-acteristics of virtual experience in elec-tronic commerce: A protocol analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing,15(3), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.1013
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowd-funding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Mollick, E. R., & Kuppuswamy, V. (2014). After the campaign: Outcomes of crowdfund-ing. UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper, (2376997). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2376997 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2376997
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capi-tal, intellectual capital, and the organiza-tional advantage. Academic Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nucciarelli, Li, F., Fernandes, K. J., Goumagias, N., Cabras, I., Devlin, S., Kudenko, D., & Cowling, P. (2017). From value chains to technological platforms: The effects of crowdfunding in the digital game indus-try. Journal of Business Research, 78, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.030
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Par-asuraman, A. (2011). Crowd‐funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155079
Parra, J. F., Valencia-Arias, A., & Bermúdez-Hernández, J. (2023). The venture crea-tion process and entrepreneurial inten-tion in emerging economies–a system dy-namic’s approach. Journal of Entrepre-neurship in Emerging Economies, 15(5), 1215-1246. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-02-2021-0048
Perrini, F., Vurro, C., & Costanzo, L. A. (2010). A process-based view of social entrepre-neurship: From opportunity identification to scaling-up social change in the case of San Patrignano. Entrepreneurship & Re-gional Development, 22(6), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.488402.
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selec-tion techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative op-tions. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
Sontag-Padilla, L.M., Staplefoote, L., & Gonza-lez Morganti, K. (2012). Financial sus-tainability for nonprofit organizations: A review of the literature. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR121.html
Vergara, R. (2015). Awareness and attitudes towards crowdfunding in the Philippines. In 9th Global Business Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 3-5).
Vergara, R.A.G. (2019). Crowdfunding and the venture creation process. Philippine Academy of Management E-Journal, 2(1). https://paomassociation.org/paom-e-journal/issues/vol-2-no-1-march-2019/
Vergara, R.A.G. & Vergara, K.C.S. (2023). Why crowdfund? Motivations of Philippine-based project owners and backers. Inter-national Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1650-1658. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.26
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raymond Allan G. Vergara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
