Navigating the Infodemic: A Bibliometric Analysis of Media Literacy Research in the Social Media Landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Disinformation, Information Literacy, MisinformationAbstract
The rapid growth of digital platforms has contributed to the faster spread of misinformation. As a result, the researchers become increasingly interested in media literacy as a way to help people understand and respond to the information they encounter online. This research paper provides a detailed bibliometric overview of global research on media literacy and misinformation published between the year 2016 and 2025. Using a Scopus dataset with 18,035 entries, data were cleaned and filtered using RStudio and Bibliometrix resulting to 856 records. The tools Biblioshiny and Vosviewer were used in investigating the published trends, influential sources and authors, citation patterns, and subjects structure. The findings showed a large increase in research output, especially after 2020, It indicates increased public concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annual scientific production has also greatly increased, reaching its peak in 2025, showing that researchers are continuing to prioritize media literacy as an important in contemporary age. Citation patterns show that during earlier publications, especially those published between 2017 and 2020, remains important and extremely influential and has serving as a foundation for future research. Leading publications like the Journal of Media Literacy Education and Media and Communication became an important publishing outlet, while a small group of highly influential authors have shaped what most researchers focuses on and discuss in the field, influencing the direction of future research and helping to build the ongoing discussion in media literacy academically.
Downloads
References
Anstead, N., Edwards, L., Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2025). The potential for media literacy
to combat misinformation: Results of a rapid evidence assessment. International Journal of Communication, 19, 2129–2151. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/23549
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola,
P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
Durr Missau, L. (2024). The role of social sciences in the study of misinformation: A bibliometric
analysis of Web of Science and Scopus publications (2017–2022). Tripodos, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.56.01
Dwivedi, V., & Sen, K. (2025). Navigating the challenges of fake news and media trust: A bibliometric
Study. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), 262-283.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2024-0106
Guess, A., & Lyons, B. (2020). Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In N.
Persily & J. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (pp. 10–33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less informed but more accurate: How digital literacy
shapes susceptibility to misinformation. Political Communication, 36(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1631940
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger,
M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S., Sunstein, C., Thorson, E., Vraga, E., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Holford, D., Finn, A., Amazeen, M. A., & Ecker, U. K. H.
(2020). The COVID-19 infodemic: Mechanisms, impact, and countermeasures. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-028
Lu, C., Hu, B., Bao, M.-M., Wang, C., Bi, C., & Ju, X.-D.(2024). Can media literacy intervention improves
fake news credibility assessment? A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social
Networking, 27(5), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.032
Navarro-Sierra, N., Magro-Vela, S., & Vinader-Segura, R. (2024). Research on disinformation in
academic studies: Perspectives through a bibliometric analysis. Publications, 12(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12020014
Pulido, C. M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., Redondo-Sama, G., & Gómez, A. (2020). COVID-19
infodemic: More retweets for false claims on coronavirus than for evidence-based links. International Sociology, 35(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920914755
Rahim, M. N., & Zare, A. (2021). A critical review of the impacts of digital citizenship on teachets and
students’ educational development. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(7), 558-564.
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.07.03
Rogayan Jr., D. V., Gallardo, C. B., Lacaste, J. T., & Roque, D.J. A. (2021). 21st-century skills of social
studies student: Basis for proposed training program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(2), 131-141
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.02.08
Sabonsolin, J. C. M. (2022). Infodemic amidst the COVID-29 in the Philippines: Spotted By Vera Files.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(2),
170-179. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019). Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of
synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The Scopus dataset used in this study was provided with access through the institution’s Scopus account. The dataset contains only publicly available bibliometric information. All data analyzed in this study, including Biblioshiny outputs and visualizations, are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Crisha Mae E. Villaruel, Joanna Marie V. Gregorio, Nomer Kirby S. Bonifacio, Gladilyn G. Dulay, Jennifer P. Solis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
