Institutional Readiness and Stakeholder Demand for a Doctor of Philosophy in Science Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
doctoral education, feasibility study, graduate program planning, market demand, science education, regional accessAbstract
This feasibility study examined the proposed offering of a Doctor of Philosophy in Science Education at the Graduate School of Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology in Masbate, Philippines. Data were gathered through a researcher-developed questionnaire with demographic items, Likert-scale indicators, and open-ended questions. Quantitative responses were summarized using frequencies, percentages, and weighted means, while the written comments were grouped through thematic analysis. Stakeholders generally viewed the proposed program favorably. The strongest ratings concerned its relevance to current educational needs, the breadth of the curriculum, the preparation of graduates for academic and research careers, and the expected contribution of the program to science education. Lower ratings were recorded for opportunities to present at national and international conferences (M = 3.65), faculty-student research collaboration (M = 3.90), scholarships or assistantships (M = 4.15), and regular curriculum updating (M = 4.15). These findings suggest that the program is attractive to its intended market, but still requires deliberate investment in research culture, student support, and academic networking. The financial projection remains positive under the stated enrollment and tuition assumptions, with a corrected six-year cumulative net balance of PHP 914,700. The program is feasible in principle, provided that DEBESMSCAT verifies the respondent dataset, documents instrument validity and reliability, secures regulatory approval, and confirms that faculty, laboratories, research resources, and long-term financing are adequate.
Downloads
References
Albert, J. R. G., Orbeta, A. C., Jr., & Paqueo, V. B. (2023). The quest for quality and equity in Philippine higher education: Where to from here? Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Commission on Higher Education. (2016). CMO No. 53, series of 2016: Policies, standards and guidelines for the Bachelor of Secondary Education.
Commission on Higher Education. (2017). CMO No. 64, series of 2017: Policies and guidelines on quality assurance in Philippine higher education through an outcomes-based and typology-based QA.
Commission on Higher Education. (2019). CMO No. 15, series of 2019: Policies, standards and guidelines for graduate programs.
Commission on Higher Education. (2025). CMO No. 21, series of 2025: Amendment to CMO No. 15, series of 2019.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
Republic Act No. 11171. (2019). An Act converting the Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology in the Municipality of Mandaon, Province of Masbate, into a state university. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elreen Aguilar-Delavin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














