Pragmatic Emphasis as A Scaffolding Tool: A Relevance Theoretic Analysis of Instructional Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.08.16Keywords:
Online Cognitive Scaffolding Devices, Pragmatic Emphasis StrategiesAbstract
This study investigates the use of micro-level pragmatic emphasis strategies of teachers as online cognitive scaffolding devices to negotiate working memory limitations and to mark the instructional salience of dense lectures. Based on Sperber and Wilson's Relevance Theory, it analyzes a corpus of spontaneous discourse from a Senior High School Creative Writing lesson to classify spoken emphasis markers evaluative adjectives, assertive adverbs, intensifiers, and directives into functional sub-types. The findings indicate that these markers function as real-time cognitive regulators, with forms tailored to the level of processing demand at hand: affirmative descriptors provide low-effort validation and consolidate abstract writing standards into easily memorable anchors; high-certainty adverbs eliminate ambiguity in subjective concepts; and pre-task intensifiers act as attentional triggers prior to complex task execution. The choice of marker aligns with the pedagogical phase in which it is employed, while localized Taglish code-switching combined with structured repetition reduces both processing effort and social distance. The research ultimately shows that conscious vocal emphasis in the teacher's speech is a crucial pedagogical device for handling cognitive load and optimizing student processing in the moment.
Downloads
References
Barbulet, G. D. (2024). Student–teacher communication in digital higher education: Politeness, implicature, and institutional interaction. Education Sciences, 14(7), 1005. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/16/7/1005
Baxter, K. A., & Feldon, D. F. (2024). The application of cognitive load theory to the design of health and behavior change programs: Principles and recommendations. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e12246501. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12246501/
Cahyani, D. A., & Surjowati, R. (2024). Integrating local language as acceptance act response strategies in academic discourse: Sociopragmatic approach. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 11(2), 142–158. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/article/view/43112
Canhasi-Kasemi, E., & Greefrath, G. (2024). Using Sweller's cognitive load theory to improve learning of derivative concepts. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 215–230. https://www.scimath.net/download/using-swellers-cognitive-load-theory-to-improve-learning-of-derivative-concepts-18060.pdf
Crossley, S. A. (2025). Linguistic markers of quality in second language writing and speech. Language Teaching, 58(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482400012X
Damayanti, A. A. (2026). Managing coherence and fluency through discourse markers in university EFL students' academic oral presentations. Jurnal English Language Teaching, 15(1), 1–21. https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/english/article/view/15482/5744
Domalewska, D. (2017). Discourse analysis of teacher talk: Code switching in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms in Thailand. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 5(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.3962
Eragamreddy, N. (2024). Exploring pragmatics: Uncovering the layers of language and meaning. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(3), 1693–1700. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v7-i3-50
Firdaus, A., Mandarani, V., Fauji, I., & Meiramova, S. (2024). Code switching and teacher’s response in M-ICO class. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 458–468. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-247-7_48
Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature. (2024). Pragmatic markers in spoken discourse. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(3), 97–117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381258847_Pragmatic_Markers_in_Spoken_Discourse
Haritsyah, Y., Zulprianto, Z., & Sawirman, S. (2024). A systemic functional linguistic analysis of mood structures in news coverage of political speeches. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 430–442. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385870261
Johnson, M. (2024). Relevance theory and the social realities of communication. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1167790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1167790
Kim, M., Duncan, C., Yip, S., & Sankey, D. (2024). Beyond the theoretical and pedagogical constraints of cognitive load theory, and towards a new cognitive philosophy in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2024.2441389
Libunao, C. D. (2025). Discourse, power, and pedagogy in AI and human-designed EFL lesson plans. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 8(1), 12–29. https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=jeal
M. Kamelabad, A. (2026). Personalized language learning with an LLM chatbot: Effects of immediate vs. Delayed corrective feedback. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1703664. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1703664/full
Ma, Y., & Sun, H. (2026). Effects of cueing interventions on online learning outcomes: A meta-analytic review of 40 studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1717604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1717604
Newton, J. (2025). "This is something beyond their capacity": Teacher educators' cognition of L2 pragmatics and challenges of its integration. Educational Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edprag.2025.100004
Radzuan, F. A. A., Zakarneh, A., & Bobkina, J. (2026). Teacher perspectives on ChatGPT integrated vocabulary instruction in a flipped ESL classroom. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 114–128. https://cplt.uitm.edu.my/v1/images/v14n1/7.%20Teacher%20Perspectives%20on%20ChatGPT.pdf
Slonimska, A., Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2026). Adults mark the communicative relevance of their gestures more for children than for other adults. Discourse Processes, 63(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2026.2618464
Surjowati, R., Coates, J., & Nuyts, J. (2024). Mood and modalities revealing teacher's power in EFL classroom discourse: Critical discourse analysis. English Language Education Reviews, 4(2), 181–200. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387171880
Susanto, D. A., NRRU Research Team, & UPGRIS Research Team. (2025). Cross-cultural classroom discourse in English language education: A comparative exploration of pedagogical practices at UPGRIS Indonesia and NRRU Thailand. Atlantis Press Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 820, 102–118. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/126021645.pdf
Sydorenko, T., Smits, T. F., & Thorne, S. L. (2024). Spoken feedback dynamics and affective engagement in interactive instructional environments. Modern Language Journal, 108(2), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12918
Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2024). Pragmatics in language learning and teaching: Cognitive and social dimensions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052400005X
Zhang, L. (2025). Do the expressions about customarily doing reflect our cognition and emotion: Evidence from Chinese BCC corpus. PLOS ONE, 20(9), Article e0324637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324637
Zuindra, Z., Mayasari, M., Geubrina, M., Arshad, N. J., & Ramsa, N. I. B. B. (2026). Enhancing foreign students' writing skills through visual media: Addressing vocabulary acquisition challenges. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 11(1), 200–222. https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/article/download/2363/1191/8265
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charles Bryan D. Beloy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).














