Strategic Thinking and Reasoning in Integer Knowledge Enhancement (Strike): Manipulative Tool in Enhancing Integer Operations

Authors

  • Ryan L Dumaguin Excelsior Polytechnic Academy, Philippines
  • Rocel A. Turco Dr Emilio B Espinosa Sr Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology image/svg+xml
  • Richel B. Rabas Dr Emilio B Espinosa Sr Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology image/svg+xml
  • Emma O. Cajurao Dr Emilio B Espinosa Sr Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology image/svg+xml
  • Rio A. Villarias Dr Emilio B Espinosa Sr Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.08.23

Keywords:

Grade 9 learners, integer operations, manipulative-based instruction, mathematics achievement, STRIKE manipulative tool

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Strategic Thinking and Reasoning in Integer Knowledge Enhancement (STRIKE) manipulative tool in improving the integer operation skills of Grade 9 learners at Lantangan National High School. A quantitative pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design was employed involving 30 purposively selected Grade 9 learners who obtained the lowest scores in the Integer Test of Primary Operations (ITPO). Participants received a two-week intervention using the STRIKE manipulative tool before completing the posttest. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize learners' performance, while paired-samples and independent-samples t-tests determined significant differences in achievement. Results revealed significant improvements in both male learners (t = −6.9099, p < .05) and female learners (t = −12.435, p < .05) following the intervention. Although female learners obtained a slightly higher mean posttest score than male learners, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (t = 1.9999, p = .0553). The findings suggest that the STRIKE manipulative tool is an effective instructional intervention for improving Grade 9 learners' performance in integer operations by enhancing their conceptual understanding and computational proficiency while providing equitable learning opportunities regardless of sex. Future studies are recommended to employ larger samples and experimental or quasi-experimental designs with comparison groups to further validate its effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acosta, C. P., & Soliba, B. L. (2024). Pedagogical approach of Grade 7 teachers in teaching the learning competency of integers. Edu-cational Technology Quarterly, 2024(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.652

Al-Balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-Balushi, K. A., Al-Hajri, F. H., & Al-Sinani, M. S. (2020). Student-centred and teacher-centred sci-ence classrooms as visualised by science teachers and their supervisors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103014

Almeida, R., & Bruno, A. (2014). Strategies of pre-service primary school teachers for solving addition problems with negative numbers. International Journal of Math-ematical Education in Science and Tech-nology, 45(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.877605

Apriana, E., Tampubolon, B., & Uliyanti, E. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan media ma-nipulatif terhadap hasil belajar matemat-ika siswa kelas IV SD. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7(6). https://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i6.25907

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of in-struction. Harvard University Press.

Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete ma-nipulatives. Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084

Chong, W. W. N., Shahrill, M., Asamoah, D., & Latif, S. N. A. (2022). Non-digital card game and Year 8 students' performance in integers. Journal of Mathematics and Sci-ence Teacher, 2(1), em007. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11928

Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Smolkowski, K., Tur-tura, J., Kosty, D., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Fien, H., & Baker, S. K. (2019). Exploring the re-lationship between initial mathematics skill and a kindergarten mathematics in-tervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918799503

Fuadiah, N. F., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstand-ing: A case study on negative integers. In-ternational Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12127a

Ganley, C. M., & Lubienski, S. T. (2016). Mathe-matics confidence, interest, and perfor-mance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations. Learning and Indi-vidual Differences, 47, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.002

Hacısalihoğlu-Karadeniz, M., & Hodancı, A. N. (2022). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin tam sayılar konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(20), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1087195

Haji Ismail, N. F., Shahrill, M., & Asamoah, D. (2023). Learning through virtual manipu-latives: Investigating the impact of Giz-mos-based lessons on students' perfor-mance in integers. Contemporary Mathe-matics and Science Education, 4(1), ep23009. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/12857

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Highlights of U.S. PISA 2022 re-sults (NCES 2023-115). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/pisa2022/

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender simi-larities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364

Khalid, M., & Embong, Z. (2019). Sources and possible causes of errors and misconcep-tions in operations of integers. Interna-tional Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0568. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6265

Kwek, D., Ho, J. E. A. N. N. E., & Wong, H. M. (2023). Singapore's educational reforms toward holistic outcomes: (Un)intended consequences of policy layering. Brook-ings Institution.

Lavidas, K., Apostolou, Z., & Papadakis, S. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of mathematics in digital times: Preschool teachers' views. Education Sciences, 12(7), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070459

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Edu-cational Computing Research, 47(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.47.2.b

Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, F. (2016). A study of errors and misconceptions in the learning of addition and subtraction of directed numbers in Grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671375

Kwakye, D. O., & Aggrey, J. (2022). The teach-ing and learning of integer operations: The case of number rule and conventional method. Journal of Education and Prac-tice, 13(27), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/13-2

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and eq-uity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Rubin, R. J., Marcelino, J., Mortel, R., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2014, March 6–8). Activity-based teaching of integer concepts and its oper-ations [Paper presentation]. DLSU Re-search Congress 2014, De La Salle Univer-sity, Manila, Philippines. DLSU Research Congress paper

Downloads

Published

24-08-2026

How to Cite

Dumaguin, R. L., Turco, R. A., Rabas, R. B., Cajurao, E. O., & Villarias, R. A. (2026). Strategic Thinking and Reasoning in Integer Knowledge Enhancement (Strike): Manipulative Tool in Enhancing Integer Operations. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(8), 3578–3594. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.08.23