Toward a Theory of Fixative Accommodation: Explaining How Bounded Change Preserves the Conditions of Recurring Difficulty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.10.15

Keywords:

Bounded change, Core preservation, Fixative accommodation, Immediate stabilization, Institutional change, Process theory

Abstract

Change is often assessed in terms of adjustment by an individual, group, organization or institution. There is less worry about those cases where the adjustment is real and directly useful, but shallow, so that something associated with the original difficulty remains largely the same. This conceptual integrative review builds fixative accommodation as an explanatory construct for this pattern. By conducting a comparative conceptual analysis, we examined and synthesized literature on accommodation and assimilation, psychological flexibility and rigidity, selective information processing, resistance and ambivalence, transformative learning, and institutional decoupling. Fixative accommodation, as defined by the synthesis, is a bounded form of adjustment that restores functioning, reduces tension, answers external pressure, or preserves legitimacy while protecting deeper beliefs, identities, habits, interests, power arrangements, or structures. Based on this synthesis, the study introduces the Fixative Accommodation Cycle: Change Pressure, Response Boundary Formation, Limited Accommodation, Immediate Stabilization, Core Preservation, and Residual Difficulty and Recurrence. The proposed theory explains how immediate stabilization can be used to reinforce the boundaries of an adjustment, thus leaving the underlying difficulty intact, or allowing it to become so. It provides a relational and temporal account of change by examining what changed, what was protected, what immediate benefit ensued, and what difficulty remained. The theory is presented as a testable process explanation whose constructs, propositions, boundary conditions, and cross-context applicability can be examined through subsequent empirical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391848

Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theo-ries: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad-emy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374

Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development in-terventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regula-tory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regu-lation. Perspectives on Psychological Sci-ence, 8(6), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116

Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.684462

Hanfstingl, B., Arzenšek, A., Apschner, J., & Gölly, K. I. (2022). Assimilation and ac-commodation: A systematic review of the last two decades. European Psychologist, 27(4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000463

Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2017). Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Under-standing and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. American Psycholo-gist, 72(5), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040437

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual arti-cles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. Brit-ish Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297

Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psy-chological flexibility as a fundamental as-pect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535

Mathias, J.-D., Anderies, J. M., Crépin, A.-S., Dambrun, M., Lindahl, T., & Norberg, J. (2024). Emergence of social-psychological barriers to social-ecological resilience: From causes to so-lutions. Ecology and Society, 29(2), Arti-cle 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15052-290206

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional-ized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. An-nual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654

Narsico, P. G. (2024). A perspective-changing teaching experience in Araimiri. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research, 5(3), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.03.22

Narsico, P. G. (2026a). From data to awaken-ing: A seven-level typology for trans-formative research aligned with the Unit-ed Nations Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Multidisci-plinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(4), 1734–1746. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.04.21

Narsico, P. G. (2026b). The Integrated Dynam-ic Self-Sufficiency (IDSS) Framework: A literature-informed conceptual model for sustainable community development. In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(8), 3537–3549. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.08.21

Narsico, P. G., Narsico, L. O., & Rio, R. B. (2024). Individual, family, and communi-ty

transformations through opportunities facilitated by Technical Vocational Edu-cation and Training (TVET). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Busi-ness and Education Research, 5(8), 3390–3410. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.08.33

Oreg, S., & Sverdlik, N. (2026). Responses to organizational change: Evolution of the concept, established findings, and future directions. Annual Review of Organiza-tional Psychology and Organizational Be-havior, 13, 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-020924-064623

Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Respons-es to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Man-agement Review, 36(4), 641–662. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0087

Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimen-sional view of attitudes toward an organ-izational change. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 25(4), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707722

Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Acad-emy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794663

Rodríguez Aboytes, J. G., & Barth, M. (2020). Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: A systematic literature re-view (1999–2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0168

Roszkowska-Menkes, M., Aluchna, M., & Kamiński, B. (2024). True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selec-tive disclosure in sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 98, Article 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102700

Singer-Brodowski, M. (2025). The potential of transformative learning for sustainability transitions: Moving beyond formal learn-ing environments. Environment, Devel-opment and Sustainability, 27(9), 20621–20639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02444-x

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a re-search methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sommer, J., Musolino, J., & Hemmer, P. (2024). Updating, evidence evaluation, and oper-ator availability: A theoretical framework for understanding belief. Psychological Review, 131(2), 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000444

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Or-ganizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.34.4.zok689

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative liter-ature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283

Venus, M., Stam, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Visions of change as visions of continuity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1196

Wang, Y., Tian, J., & Yang, Q. (2024). Experien-tial avoidance process model: A review of the mechanism for the generation and maintenance of avoidance behavior. Psy-chiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 34(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2024.23777

Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a the-oretical contribution? Academy of Man-agement Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The inte-grative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Downloads

Published

23-10-2026

How to Cite

Narsico, P. G. (2026). Toward a Theory of Fixative Accommodation: Explaining How Bounded Change Preserves the Conditions of Recurring Difficulty. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(10), 4454–4478. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.10.15