The Adaptive Empowerment Cycle: A Concept-Driven Integrative Review of Resource Mobilization and Capacity Development Under Adversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.10.17Keywords:
Adaptive capacity, Adaptive empowerment cycle, Adversity, Empowerment, Integrative literature review, Multisystem resilience, Resource mobilizationAbstract
People and communities in adversity often have resources that are useful but invisible, inaccessible or disconnected from purposeful action. In this article, we propose the Adaptive Empowerment Cycle (AEC) as a way to describe how personal, relational, cultural, and structural resources can be used to address a current difficulty and become capacity for future challenges. The study employed a concept-driven integrative literature review to synthesize scholarship on adaptive responses to adversity, empowerment and agency, resource mobilization, iterative feedback, and multisystem resilience. Sources were selected for their conceptual relevance and synthesized through thematic comparison and stage mapping. Analysis revealed a six-stage recursive model: Identification, Adoption, Integration, Application, Adjustment and Consolidation. Identification identifies useful potential resources. Adoption is an active decision to involve them. Integration is aligning them with existing values, relationships and practices; Application applies them to the present difficulty; Adjustment is feedback to improve a response; Consolidation is to retain learning, relationships, and capabilities for future challenges. The review also suggests that combined potential forces may, under enabling conditions, exceed the demands of adversity. This is a conceptual rather than a numerical claim, and it does not imply that internal resources are always available or sufficient. Adversity is thus seen as the condition that activates resources rather than as a positive force in itself. The AEC offers a strengths-based but context-specific framework for community development, education, leadership, personal growth and organizational change. The sequence, boundaries and practical value of the model should be empirically and cross-culturally researched.
Downloads
References
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. Ameri-can Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource con-struction through entrepreneurial brico-lage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brodsky, A. E., Buckingham, S., Fedi, A., Gatti-no, S., Rochira, A., Altal, D., & Mannarini, T. (2022). Resilience and empowerment in immigrant experiences: A look through the transconceptual model of empower-ment and resilience. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 92(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000634
Cattaneo, L. B., & Chapman, A. R. (2010). The process of empowerment: A model for use in research and practice. American Psychologist, 65(7), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018854
Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geog-raphy, 36(4), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425708
Crielaard, L., Uleman, J. F., Châtel, B. D. L., Epskamp, S., Sloot, P. M. A., & Quax, R. (2024). Refining the causal loop diagram: A tutorial for maximizing the contribu-tion of domain expertise in computation-al system dynamics modeling. Psychological Methods, 29(1), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000484
Doll, B., & Song, S. Y. (2023). Enhancing resili-ence in classrooms. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (3rd ed., pp. 525–537). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14728-9_28
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implemen-tation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on pro-gram outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
Feekery, A. (2024). The 7 C’s framework for participatory action research: Inducting novice participant-researchers. Educa-tional Action Research, 32(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2234417
Fernández, J. S., & Fine, M. (2024). Methodo-logical retrospective: Critical participa-tory action research. Qualitative Psychol-ogy, 12(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000321
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organiza-tional resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of re-sources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their conse-quences. Annual Review of Organization-al Psychology and Organizational Behav-ior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
Infurna, F. J., & Jayawickreme, E. (2019). Fix-ing the growth illusion: New directions for research in resilience and posttrau-matic growth. Current Directions in Psy-chological Science, 28(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827017
Infurna, F. J., Jayawickreme, E., Woods-Jaeger, B., & Zalta, A. K. (2024). Understanding adaptive responses to adversity: Intro-duction to the special issue on rethinking resilience and posttraumatic growth. American Psychologist, 79(8), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001442
Jagosh, J., Macaulay, A. C., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Henderson, J., Sirett, E., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Herbert, C. P., Seifer, S. D., Green, L. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2012). Uncovering the benefits of partic-ipatory research: Implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 90(2), 311–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x
Joseph, R. (2020). The theory of empower-ment: A critical analysis with the Theory Evaluation Scale. Journal of Human Be-havior in the Social Environment, 30(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1660294
Kirmayer, L. J., Dandeneau, S., Marshall, E., Phillips, M. K., & Williamson, K. J. (2011). Rethinking resilience from Indigenous perspectives. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600203
London, M. (2023). Causes and consequences of adaptive leadership: A model of lead-ers’ rapid responses to unexpected events. Psychology of Leaders and Leader-ship, 26(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000136
Lubbers, M. J., Valenzuela García, H., Escribano Castaño, P., Molina, J. L., Casellas, A., & Grau Rebollo, J. (2020). Relationships stretched thin: Social support mobiliza-tion in poverty. The ANNALS of the Amer-ican Academy of Political and Social Sci-ence, 689(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220911913
Masten, A. S. (2021). Multisystem resilience: Pathways to an integrated framework. Research in Human Development, 18(3), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1958604
Mathie, A., & Cunningham, G. (2003). From clients to citizens: Asset-based communi-ty development as a strategy for commu-nity-driven development. Development in Practice, 13(5), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452032000125857
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and de-signing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Morris, L. S., Grehl, M. M., Rutter, S. B., Mehta, M., & Westwater, M. L. (2022). On what motivates us: A detailed review of intrin-sic v. extrinsic motivation. Psychological Medicine, 52(10), 1801–1816. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722001611
Movsisyan, A., Arnold, L., Evans, R., Halling-berg, B., Moore, G., O’Cathain, A., Pfaden-hauer, L. M., Segrott, J., & Rehfuess, E. (2019). Adapting evidence-informed complex population health interventions for new contexts: A systematic review of guidance. Implementation Science, 14, Article 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0956-5
Narsico, P. G. (2024). A perspective-changing teaching experience in Araimiri. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research, 5(3), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.03.22
Narsico, P. G. (2026a). From data to awaken-ing: A seven-level typology for trans-formative research aligned with the Unit-ed Nations Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Multidisci-plinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(4), 1734–1746. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.04.21
Narsico, P. G. (2026b). The Integrated Dynam-ic Self-Sufficiency (IDSS) Framework: A literature-informed conceptual model for sustainable community development. In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 7(8), 3537–3549. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.07.08.21
Narsico, P. G., Narsico, L. O., & Rio, R. B. (2024). Individual, family, and communi-ty transformations through opportunities facilitated by technical vocational educa-tion and training (TVET). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Busi-ness and Education Research, 5(8), 3390–3410. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.08.33
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual frame-work for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmen-tal Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psy-chology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the mean-ing literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on ad-justment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
Riaz, S., Morgan, D., & Kimberley, N. (2023). Managing organizational transformation (OT) using complex adaptive system (CAS) framework: Future lines of inquiry. Journal of Organizational Change Man-agement, 36(3), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2022-0241
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human De-velopment, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
Rogers, P., & Macfarlan, A. (2020). An over-view of monitoring and evaluation for adaptive management (Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptive Management Working Paper Series, No. 1). Bet-terEvaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org/tools-resources/overview-monitoring-evaluation-for-adaptive-management-working-paper-1
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Defini-tions, theory, practices, and future direc-tions. Contemporary Educational Psy-chology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Shelton, R. C., Cooper, B. R., & Stirman, S. W. (2018). The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in pub-lic health and health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731
Silverman, D. M., Rosario, R. J., Hernandez, I. A., & Destin, M. (2023). The ongoing de-velopment of strength-based approaches to people who hold systemically margin-alized identities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221145243
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a re-search methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Man-agement Annals, 12(2), 752–788. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0095
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capa-bilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative liter-ature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoret-ical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
Ungar, M. (Ed.). (2021). Multisystemic resili-ence: Adaptation and transformation in contexts of change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095888.001.0001
Ungar, M., & Theron, L. (2020). Resilience and mental health: How multisystemic pro-cesses contribute to positive outcomes. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(5), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30434-1
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017). Or-ganizational response to adversity: Fus-ing crisis management and resilience re-search streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134
Yu, M., Wen, J., Smith, S. M., & Stokes, P. (2022). Building-up resilience and being effective leaders in the workplace: A sys-tematic review and synthesis model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(7), 1098–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2021-0437
Zusho, A., & Prieto, D. (2020). Promoting learning for all in motivationally support-ive, culturally responsive, inclusive envi-ronments. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McIn-erney (Eds.), Promoting motivation and learning in contexts: Sociocultural per-spectives on educational interventions (pp. 63–82). Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/book-978-1-64802-162-620251005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Peter G. Narsico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
