Main Article Content


This descriptive survey aimed to explore the pedagogical competence of science pre-service teachers (PSTs). The study involved 35 PSTs in a state university in Central Luzon, Philippines. In accordance to the National Competency-Based Teachers Standard (NCBTS) domains, science PSTs were assessed using an adapted NCBTS survey questionnaire to find out the pedagogical areas they do best and the areas that they have to develop. Results revealed that a typical science PST is a female, aged 21 years old and below from college. The study concluded that the pedagogical competence of Science pre-service teachers is moderately evident in terms of social regard for learning, learning environment, diversity of learners, curriculum, community linkages and personal growth and professional development domain. The findings on this study served as basis in constructing a training program for science PSTs which could enhance their pedagogical competence as they embrace the actual workplace after graduation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Obispo, G. J. O. (2022). Pedagogical Competence of Science Pre-Service Teachers: Baseline for Training Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(6), 1139-1158.


Alderite, Busquit & Mejica.(2008). Instructional Compe-tencies of Holy Cross of Davao College Education Faculty Assessed Through the National Competen-cy-Based Teacher Standard (NCBTS)
Ambag, S. C. (2014). Assessment of competency level of pre-service teachers based on national competen-cy- based teacher standards (NCBTS) in public school in the national capital region (NCR). Full paper Proceeding, (1), 18-54.
Avalos, B.(2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education. Teach-ing and teacher education. 1(3).
Aziz, N.F & Said, I. (2011). The trends and influential factors of children’s use of outdoor environments: a review. Asian Journal of environment-Behaviour studies, 2(5), 67-79.
Best, John W. & Kahn, J.V. (2007). Research in education: New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private.
Biong, Å (2013). A Swedish Perspective on Pedagogical Competence. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Correos C. (2014), Teachers’ ICT Literacy and Utilization in English Language Teaching, ‘ICT & Innovations in Education’ International Electronic Journal, 2 (1), 1-25.
De leon, Elmer, (2010). An Assessment of the Field Study Courses of the Revised Teacher Education Curricu-lum among Higher Education Institutions in the National CapitalRegion.
Dillon, J.T. (2017), Teaching and Art of Questioning. Fastback 194. Phi Delta Kappa, Dallas, TX. North-Metro Chapter.
Durmusoglu, C., Yanik, C. & Akkoyunlu B. (2009). Turkish and Azeri student teachers'attitude stowards the teaching profession.Hacettepe University Faculty of Educ.J.,36:76-86
Emereole, H. U. (2009). Learners’ and teachers’ concep-tual understanding of science processes: the case of botswana. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1033-1056.
Erden, M. (1998). Nigerian pre-service science teachers’s self-perceptions of acquired pedagogical knowledge and skills after teaching practice expo-sures. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 8(1), 108.
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal educa-tion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
Ewers TG (2001). Teacher-directed versus learning cy-cles methods: Effects on science process skills mas-tery and teacher efficacy among elementary educa-tion students. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Timothy Gorman. University of Idaho, United States. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing, 2001. 3022333.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 Percent Solu-tion School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98(6) 486-493.
Goodlod, J. I., et. al. (2008) teaching for intelligence, sec-ond edition, corwin press. pp.2
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. Effective class-room practices report. National Center on As-sessing the General Curriculum,CAST, U.S. Office of the special education program. (Retrieved, from http//
Hayden, M. & Thomson, J. (2013).International school and international education. Improving school management and quality.
Henry, G.T., Bastian, K.C. & Fortner, C.K. (2011). Stayers and leavers: earlycareer teacher effectiveness and attrition. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 65-77.
Hudson, P. and Skamp, K. (2002). Mentoring preservice teachers of primary science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 1(7), 29.
Huissain. (2011). Resiliency to success: supporting nov-ice urban teachers. Teacher Development, 14(4), 483-499.
Jones, G. (2015). The relationship between elementary teachers’ years of experience and their self-perceived pedagogical competence in Alabama elementary schools. United States: ProQuest LLC, 12.
Karamustafaoğlu S (2011). Improving the Science Pro-cess Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Us-ing I Diagrams. Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ. 3(1):26-38.
Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Voss, T., Klusmann, U., Richter, D., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 105(3), 805-820.
Lizzio, A. (2013). First-year students’ appraisal of as-sessment tasks: implications for efficacy, engage-ment and performance. University of Australlia. Pp.389-406.
Lotter, Harwood & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of in-quiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching, 44(1), 1318-1347.
Lukvanova, M. (2001). Reflection on Replicating Mil-gram. American Psychologist, 64(1), 22-27.
Madhavaram, S., Laverie, D.A. (2010). Developing peda-gogical competence: issues and implications for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Educa-tion, X(XX), 2-10.
Meiers, M. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning, Teaching Practice and Student Learning Outcomes: Important Issues. In T. Townsend & R. Bates (Eds.), Handbook Of Teacher Education: Globalization, Standards and Professionalism in Times of Change (pp. 409-414). Netherlands: Springer.
Mutlu M, Temiz BK (2013). Science process skills of stu-dents having field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. Educ. Res. Rev. 8(11), 766 -776,
O’ Brien, M. (2008). Threshold concepts for university teaching and learning: a study of troublesome knowledge (pp. 289-306). In: Land, R., Meyer, J.H.F. & Smith, J. (Eds.). Threshold concepts within the disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Padilla, M. J., 2001. The Science Process Skills. National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Re-trieved May 15, 2011. United State Department of Education.
Salaria, A (2012). The science of environmental research. Kurukshetra: NirmalBook Agency.
Swethen (2008). national competency based teacher standard (NCBTS). Retrieved (2017, April 28) from
Terzi & Tezci, E. (2007).Necatibey Faculty of Education Students' Attitudes to Teaching Profession. Theory & Practice of Educational Administration,52:593-614.
Tiangco, E. A. (2014). Professional readiness, teachers' attitude and collaborative practices of general and special education teachers. Education Quarterly, 72(2).
Umar, Y. (2013). Pre‐service teachers’ understanding and teaching of nature of science: an intervention study. Journal.
UP NISMED & SEI-DOST, (2011). Framework for Philip-pine science teacher education, (18). Retrieved from Error! Hyperlink reference not valid..
Wooley, A. & Malone, T.(2011). What makes a team smarter? More women. Harvard business review. 1(1). Retrieved:
Vecaldo, Andres, Carag, & Carangui-an.(2017).Pedagogical Competence and Academic Performance of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers in Tuguegarao City,Cagayan State University