Level of Awareness, Acceptance, and Congruency with the Vision, Mission, Goals, and Program Outcomes of the College of Education of Capiz State University (CAPSU)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.06.11Keywords:
Acceptance, Awareness, CongruencyAbstract
This research evaluated the level of awareness, acceptance, and congruence with the Vision, Mission, and Goals (VMGO) and Program Outcomes of the College of Education at Capiz State University (CAPSU). It adopted a mixed-method research design, utilizing a descriptive-quantitative approach, with both internal and external stakeholders of CAPSU as the primary data source. Through a survey questionnaire employing a five-point Likert scale, this study measures stakeholders' awareness, acceptability, and congruence with CapSU's VMG and the program outcomes of the College of Education. The gathered data were analyzed using weighted mean, T-test, and Pearson Correlation via SPSS software (version 20). Findings suggest a high level of awareness and acceptance of CAPSU’s VMGO among internal and external stakeholders, and a high congruence between the VMGO and actual educational practices. Interestingly, external stakeholders showed moderate acceptance of the College of Education's program outcomes. No significant difference was found between internal and external stakeholders' levels of awareness and acceptance, nor any correlation among these variables. The study concludes by highlighting the necessity for continuous efforts to enhance stakeholders' awareness, acceptance, and congruence with the VMGO and program outcomes. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of stakeholder involvement in any revision process related to the VMGO. Lastly, the study recommends periodic assessments of stakeholders' awareness and acceptance of the VMG for sustainable institutional development.
Downloads
References
AACCUP Revised Instrument. The Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universi-ties in the Philippines, Inc., 2010
Akareem, H. S., & Hossain, S. S. (2016). Determi-nants of education quality: what makes stu-dents’ perception different?. Open review of educational research, 3(1), 52-67.
Betances, Samuel. (1992). “Administrator’s role in building a collective vision.” Online. Available http://www.ncrel.org August 30, 2010
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organ-izations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Castillo, R. C. (2014). Awareness, acceptance and perception of Batangas State University
stakeholders towards its vision, mission, goals and objectives. International journal of sciences: Basic and applied Research, 14(1), 546-563.
Compelio, K. J. T., Caranto, L. C., & David, J. J. (2015). Awareness, understanding, and acceptance of student nurses of the vision, mission, goals and objectives of Benguet State Universi-ty. International Journal of Nursing Sci-ence, 5(1), 20-27.
Dobni, C. B., Klassen, M., & Sands, D. (2016). Getting to clarity: New ways to think about strate-gy. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(5), 12-21.
Duque, L. C., & Weeks, J. R. (2010). Towards a mod-el and methodology for assessing student learning outcomes and satisfaction. Quality assurance in education, 18(2), 84-105.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Gravina, N., Sleiman, A., & Matey, N. (2019). Partici-pation of women in the Journal of Organiza-tional Behavior Management: An update and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 39(3-4), 227-236.
Gyurko, J., & Snow, M. (2020). Our “directive”: Qual-ity teaching and learning. Change: The Maga-zine of Higher Learning, 52(5), 6-16.
Mendoza, L. M. A. A. D., & Esmero, D. R. P. (2019). Awareness, Understanding, Acceptance, and Congruency of the PIT Vision and Mission, College Goal and Program Objectives.
Sadashiva, M. Stakeholder Surveys, 2010. http://www.pgexchange.org.
Saroyan, A., & Trigwell, K. (2015). Higher education teachers’ professional learning: Process and outcome. Studies in educational evaluation, 46, 92-101.
Sung, Y. T., Lee, H. Y., Yang, J. M., & Chang, K. E. (2019). The quality of experimental designs in mobile learning research: A systemic re-view and self-improvement tool. Educational Research Review, 28, 100279.
Oplatka, I. (2016). “Irresponsible leadership” and unethical practices in schools: a conceptual framework of the “dark side” of educational leadership. In The dark side of leadership: Identifying and overcoming unethical prac-tice in organizations (Vol. 26, pp. 1-18). Em-erald Group Publishing Limited
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
