Development and Validation of Micro-Lecture Videos as Learning Support Material for Grade 7 Science Competencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.02.20Keywords:
ADDIE model, LRMDS, Micro-lecture Videos, PhysicsAbstract
As students opted for modular distance learning during the pandemic, they were forced to self-regulated learning with little assistance from teachers. Video lectures are materials commonly designed for active learning methods in distance learning. However, studies found that the length of videos has a strong influence on students’ control over their learning. Longer videos have issues sustaining students’ focused attention to content. This study aimed to develop, validate and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of micro-lecture videos in Physics. Using the developmental research design anchored on the ADDIE model, 7 videos were developed. Videos were quality assured and administered to grade 7 students for evaluation, and feedbacking. Using a developed instrument, an LRMDS standard evaluation tool from the Department of Education, and thematic analysis, quality assurance results, test scores, and interview transcripts were gathered and analyzed statistically and thematically. Results show that despite limited engagement, video lectures are vital so students are guided to self–regulate their learning at their own pace. They also brought positive outcomes, particularly on ownership of learning where students manage and control the pace of their video view, allowing them to replay anytime. On the quality of materials, micro-lecture videos have relevant, logically arranged information, with appropriate content and language that are free of bias. They also have a well-defined purpose, are content-friendly, and can engage viewers for a better understanding of concepts. Moreover, end-users responded that the material was easy to use, can be viewed in messenger, and can be downloaded anytime since it has a smaller file size.
Downloads
References
Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. (2020). De-signing Quality E-Learning Environments for Emergency Remote Teaching in Coronavirus Crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. Available online: https://staff.najah.edu/media/published_research/2020/05/14/Designing.pdf.
Algarni, B., & Lortie‐Forgues, H. (2022). An evaluation of the impact of flipped‐classroom teaching on mathematics pro-ficiency and self‐efficacy in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Educational Technolo-gy.
Artman, N. (2020). Applying the cognitive the-ory of multimedia learning: Using the ADDIE model to enhance instructional video. Explorations in Media Ecology, 19(3), 371-380.
Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of dif-ferent video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Edu-cation, 80, 108-121.
Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Prop-per, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of surgical education, 77(4), 729-732.
Ekici, F., Ekici, E., Ekici, F. T., & Kara, İ. (2012). Öğretmenlere yönelik bilişim teknolojileri öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Pamuk-kale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(31), 53-65.
Elias, S. K. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ ap-proaches to the effectiveness of micro-teaching in teaching practice programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 205-224.
Fogarty, J. E. (2017, June). Assessment of flipped classroom in upper-level engi-neering course. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Garber, A. M. (2020). Flipping out! Utilizing an online micro-lecture for asynchronous learning within the acting internship. Medical Science Educator, 30(1), 91-96.
Grossman, R., Salas, E., & Pavlas, D. „& Rosen, MA (2013). Using instructional features to enhance demonstration-based training in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 219-243.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How vid-eo production affects student engage-ment. Proceedings of the First ACM Con-ference on Learning @ Scale Conference - L@S 14. doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239
Ilić, V. (2022, March 2). The Power of User Feedback and its Importance on Software Development Process. TNation. Retrieved October 24, 2022, from https://www.tnation.eu/blog/user-feedback-and-software-develop-ment/?fbclid=IwAR0wj3_ZaYd9kNuJwGekbEA20s1cRhyd5Y_jD2_YioGCeXPX5jgxEq3FhFs
Joseph‐Richard, P., Jessop, T., Okafor, G., Almpanis, T., & Price, D. (2018). Big brother or harbinger of best practice: Can lecture capture actually improve teach-ing?. British Educational Research Jour-nal, 44(3), 377-392.
Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2015). The instructor’s face in video in-struction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 107(3), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000013
Le Roux, I., & Nagel, L. (2018). Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom–viewing student perceptions through the Community of Inquiry lens. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-28.
Lee, Y., & Martin, K. I. (2020). The flipped classroom in ESL teacher education: An example from CALL. Education and In-formation Technologies, 25(4), 2605-2633.
Liu, X. Y., Lu, C., Zhu, H., Wang, X., Jia, S., Zhang, Y., ... & Wang, Y. F. (2022). As-sessment of the effectiveness of BOPPPS-based hybrid teaching model in physiolo-gy education. BMC medical education, 22(1), 1-10.
Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2013). The Analysis on Sys-tematic Development of College Micro-lecture. Higher Education Studies, 3(6). doi:10.5539/hes.v3n6p65
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2019). The impact of flipped classrooms on student achieve-ment in engineering education: A meta‐analysis of 10 years of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 523-546.
Lopez, E. N. B., Maraño, C. M. B., Origenes, R. W., Pizaña, A. D., Salmo, J. M., & Picardal, J. P. (2022). Content analysis of cell divi-sion concepts in Senior High School Biol-ogy textbooks. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 8(2), 159-177.
Manalastas, R. S., & De Leon, S. P. (2021). DE-VELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUCTIONAL MODULE IN MATTER.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of mul-timedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 43–71). Cambridge Universi-ty Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_6
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning: Implica-tions for Design Principles. CHI 1998. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248528255_A_Cognitive_Theory_of_Multime-dia_Learning_Implications_for_Design_Principles
McClelland, C. J. (2013, June). Flipping a Large-enrollment Fluid Mechanics Course–Is it Effective?. In 2013 ASEE Annual Confer-ence & Exposition (pp. 23-607).
olde Scholtenhuis, L., Vahdatikhaki, F., & Rouwenhorst, C. (2021). Flipped micro-lecture classes: satisfied learners and higher performance?. European journal of engineering education, 46(3), 457-478.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Educa-tion for the Future, 8(1), 133-141.
Potane, J. (2022). Design and Utilization of Television and Radio Lessons amid.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
