From Data to Awakening: A Seven-Level Typology for Transformative Research Aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
Awakening Insights, Community-Based Research, Empowerment, Intentionality, Research Typology, Transformative Practice, Visionary InquiryAbstract
This paper presents a seven-level typology of research results (descriptive, interpretative, prescriptive, reflective, generative, transformative, meta-transformative) so that we can understand scholarly depth and impact. Fluid and interdependent, these levels guide research from observation to social change. Inspired by the ambitious goals of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this typology suggests that research has to go beyond technical rigor to a higher ethical and human level. It is a way to question the level of evidence and conceptual depth that is necessary for researchers to bring data to life and to help them to view research as a pathway to creating a just, inclusive society for a sustainable planet. In sustainability, education, and health, research is transforming from something that is just to be right and just to be good as well as transformative. If one wants to frame inquiry as a recursive and sacred activity, then in this model it also creates the notion that research can reveal truths, empower communities and open up new opportunities in every field and culture and it is how research is to illuminate truths and to inspire communities and new possibilities in disciplines and cultures.
Downloads
References
Arxer, S. L. (2025). The role of community-engaged qualitative research in urban governance: Enhancing public manage-ment and policy outcomes. In Global En-cyclopedia of Public Administration, Pub-lic Policy, and Governance. Springer. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_4486-1
Asmawi, A., & Alam, M. S. (2024). Qualitative research: Understanding its underlying philosophies. Forum for Education Stud-ies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i2.1320
Astaneh, B., & Masoumi, S. (2018). From paper to practice: Indexing systems and ethical standards. Science and Engineering Eth-ics, 24, 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9899-x
Bergsteedt, B., & du Plessis, A. (2025). Reimag-ining transformation through strategic thinking and accountable governance in the South African public university sys-tem. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01517-w
Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2025). Psychology, the posts, and qualitative research. Quali-tative Research in Psychology, 22(3), 708–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2425716
Carta, J. J., Wills, H., Greenwood, C. R., Beecher, C., Bowman-Perrott, L., & Lee, J. D. (2025). Nurturing the next generation of community-engaged researcher leaders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43494-025-00164-1.pdf
Credé, M., & Harms, P. D. (2021). Three cheers for descriptive statistics—and five more reasons why they matter. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(4), 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.110
Currier, J. M., Drescher, K. D., & Harris, J. I. (2015). Spiritual functioning among vet-erans seeking residential treatment for PTSD: A matched control group study. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000019
Dagli, G., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2025). Edu-cation for sustainable development: Chal-lenges and opportunities of transforma-tive learning and teaching. Sustainability, 17(6), 2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062440
Elliott, R., & Timulak, L. (2021). Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative re-search: A generic approach. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/essentials-descriptive-interpretive-qualitative-research
Elsevier. (n.d.). Pure Impact AI: Evidence-based impact narratives, informed by responsi-ble AI. Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/products/pure/impact-ai
Gagliardi, A. R., Berta, W., Kothari, A., Boyko, J., & Urquhart, R. (2017). Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health systems: A scoping review. Implementa-tion Science, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3
Grund, J., Singer-Brodowski, M., & Büssing, A. G. (2023). Emotions and transformative learning for sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability Science, 19, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01439-5
Horcea‑Milcu, A.‑I., Dorresteijn, I., Leventon, J., Stojanovic, M., Lam, D. P. M., Lang, D. J., Moriggi, A., Raymond, C. M., Stålhammar, S., Weiser, A., & Zimmermann, S. (2024). Transformative research for sus-tainability: characteristics, tensions, and moving forward. Global Sustainability, 7, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.12
Huynh, T. (2022). Reinforcing reflective prac-tice through reflective writing in higher education: A systematic review. Interna-tional Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 1–18. https://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1959
Întorsureanu, I., Oprea, S.-V., Bâra, A., & Ves-pan, D. (2025). Generative AI in educa-tion: Perspectives through an academic lens. Electronics, 14(5), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14051053
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Criti-cal Participatory Action Research. Spring-er. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Liang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2025). The relative effects of input- and output-based instruc-tion on the development of L2 knowledge and the relationships with individual dif-ferences in working memory. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00343-y
Lim, W. M. (2024). What is qualitative re-search? An overview and guidelines. Aus-tralasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, con-tradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–128). Sage Publications. https://miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2018_denzin_lincoln_handbook_qualitative_research-213-263.pdf
Lubbe, S., & Botha, J. (2020). Building con-scious awareness through reflective prac-tice in education. University of East Lon-don Research Repository. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8x371
Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2015). Doing interview-based qualitative research: A learner’s guide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449893
Matta, C. (2022). Philosophical paradigms in qualitative research methods education: What is their pedagogical role? Scandina-vian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Transformative-Research-and-Evaluation/Donna-Mertens/9781593853020
Misa. (2025, June 17). Descriptive research: Key features, approaches, and real-world applications. ResearchMate. https://researchmate.net/descriptive-research/
Mohamed, M., Ab Rashid, R., & Alqaryouti, M. H. (2022). Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education. Fron-tiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1008234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234
Moriggi, A. (2021). An ethos and practice of appreciation for transformative research: Appreciative inquiry, care ethics, and cre-ative methods. In Co-Creativity and En-gaged Scholarship (pp. 131–164). Spring-er. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-84248-2_5
Narsico, P. G. (2024). A Perspective-Changing Teaching Experience in Araimiri. Interna-tional Journal of Multidisciplinary: Ap-plied Business and Education Research. 5(3), 993 – 1007. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.03.22
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2023). 'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and ap-proaches across subject fields: Implica-tions for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality & Quantity, 58, 2357–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4
Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Mariano, C. M., & Santos, M. C. (2025). Digital and sustainable edu-cation and social inclusion: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 17(13), 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135677
Rogers, B. (1998). Descriptive analysis of re-search data. AAOHN Journal, 46(5), 266–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999804600507
Sathyanarayana, S., & Mohanasundaram, T. (2025). Standardized reporting of statis-tical results in APA format: Enhancing clarity, transparency, and reproducibility in research. Asian Journal of Advanced Re-search and Reports, 19(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2025/v19i2903
Savage, C., & Ikoma, S. (2023). Access to civics content and evidence-based instructional approaches in U.S. schools (AIR-NAEP Working Paper #2023-07). American In-stitutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED638661.pdf
Schneidewind, U., & Singer-Brodowski, M. (2013). Testing the quality of transforma-tive science methods: The example of Human Scale Development. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00966-3
Shidiq, M. S., Maksum, M. N. R., & Narimo, S. (2024). Bibliometric Investigation of De-velopment and Research Trends in Trans-formative Education. ISETH Proceedings. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/article/view/3845
Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259-000
St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative re-search: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 611–626). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
St. Pierre, E. A. (2023). Poststructuralism and post qualitative inquiry: What can and must be thought. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221122282
Sugito, S. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of transformative learning research: Trends and developments from 1992 to 2023. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2411092. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2411092
Thelwall, M., & Pinfield, S. (2024). The accura-cy of field classifications for journals in Scopus. Scientometrics. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04901-4
UChicago Consortium. (n.d.). Understanding the Limitations of Descriptive Research and Data. https://toandthrough.uchicago.edu/news/understanding-limitations-descriptive-research-and-data
Varela-Losada, M., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., Lo-renzo-Rial, M. A., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2022). In search of transformative learn-ing for sustainable development: Biblio-metric analysis of recent scientific pro-duction. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 786560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.786560
Vianna, E., & Podlucká, D. (2021). The ethics of affects in transformative activist qualita-tive research: Struggle and solidarity in collaborative inquiry. Qualitative Re-search and Social Intervention. https://www.academia.edu/121204970/THE_
ETH-ICS_OF_AFFECTS_IN_TRANSFORMATIVE_ACTIV-IST_QUALITATIVE_RESEARCH_Struggle_and_Solidarity_in_Collaborative_Inquiry
Xiaoyu, W., Zainuddin, Z., & Hai Leng, C. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in pedagogical practices: A systematic re-view of empirical studies (2022–2024). Cogent Education, 12(1), 2485499. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2485499
Yolanda, E., & Rifani, A. (2024). Bridging trans-formational leadership and sustainability in higher education: A systematic litera-ture review. Asian Journal of Manage-ment, Entrepreneurship and Social Sci-ence, 4(2), 1347–1372. https://www.ajmesc.com/index.php/ajmesc/article/view/1347
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Peter G. Narsico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
