Challenges in the Implementation of Aral Program as Perceived by the Teachers in Zone I Schools Division of Zambales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/Keywords:
ARAL Program, Challenges, Delivery mode, Learners, Learning materials, TutorsAbstract
Regional literacy gaps and poor international assessment scores prompted the Philippine government to establish the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program under Republic Act 12028. This study investigated the challenges faced by teachers in implementing the ARAL Program in Zone 1, Schools Division of Zambales.
Utilizing a descriptive quantitative survey design, data were gathered via purposive sampling from 129 public elementary school teachers across the districts of Sta. Cruz, Candelaria, and Masinloc. A self-developed 4-point Likert scale questionnaire assessed challenges across five structural domains.
Teachers perceived the ARAL Program implementation as "Challenging" across all studied areas (overall weighted means: 3.00–3.08). Local Government Support emerged as the most severe challenge (M=3.08), heavily driven by difficulties in mobilizing local stakeholders (M=3.13). Access to Learning Materials (M=3.04) and Qualification of Tutors (M=3.04) presented equal difficulties, primarily due to poor internet connectivity obstructing digital resource access (M=3.15) and tutors lacking formal pedagogical training (M=3.13). Furthermore, student unwillingness to participate (M=3.13) and the burden of developing materials adaptive to both online and face-to-face setups (M=3.23) hindered effective student identification and delivery modes.
Successful learning recovery is constrained by systemic hurdles, including weak community mobilization, digital infrastructure deficits, and untrained tutoring personnel. It is recommended that school divisions provide targeted multimodal material development training, invest in low-bandwidth or offline instructional alternatives, and forge formalized partnership agreements with local government units to secure sustained logistical and financial backing.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N., Karim, M. F., & Hassan, R. (2024). Student engagement in remedial learning programs: Teachers’ perspectives on par-ticipation and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 17(2), 489–504.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Quali-tative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cruz, R. A., Garcia, M. L., & Mendoza, P. T. (2024). Community participation and sus-tainability of school based intervention programs. International Journal of Edu-cational Development, 102, 102854.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.3386/w1761
David, A. P., Balinas, E. S., & Salazar, M. L. (2023). Teachers’ challenges in develop-ing instructional materials for blended learning environments. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 4(2), 98–112.
Dela Cruz, A. M., Ramirez, J. P., & Soriano, L. T. (2023). Learner participation and motiva-tion in remedial education programs. In-ternational Journal of Educational Man-agement and Development Studies, 4(3), 84–98.
Kurniawan, A., Suryanto, T., & Widodo, H. (2022). Instructional resource prepara-tion in flexible learning environments: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Educa-tion and Learning, 16(3), 415–424.
Lawis, R. Y., (2026). Learners' Reading En-gagement, Attitudes, and Proficiency: A Quantitative Correlational Study in the DADASANTRI Districts. INTERNATION-AL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNO-VATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS) ISSN No. 2454-6186 | DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS | Volume X Issue XXVI February 2026| Special Issue on Educa-tion.
Lim, S. Y., Tan, K. L., & Chua, S. Y. (2022). Pro-fessional development and teacher as-sessment competency in intervention programs. International Journal of In-struction, 15(4), 1680–1694.
Lopez, R., & Santos, J. (2019). The impact of formative assessment practices on stu-dent outcomes in Philippine classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), 45-57.
Nguyen, T. L., Tran, H. Q., & Le, M. T. (2022). Challenges in digital resource utilization among teachers in blended learning envi-ronments. International Journal of In-struction, 15(4), 1025–1040.
Rahman, N. A., Abdullah, N., & Karim, M. F. (2024). Professional commitment and ca-reer stages among school teachers: Im-plications for educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 16(1), 34–46.
Santos, J. P., Dela Cruz, A. M., & Villanueva, R. M. (2023). Tutor qualifications and in-structional quality in academic recovery programs. International Journal of Edu-cational Management and Development Studies, 4(2), 77–91.
Santos, M., & Reyes, C. (2020). The impact of socio-economic status on reading achievement in the Philippines: A case study. International Journal of Educa-tional Development, 70, 101-110.
Santoso, B., Hidayat, R., & Prabowo, A. (2022). Student attitudes toward academic re-covery initiatives and their influence on learning engagement. Journal of Educa-tion and Learning, 16(4), 512–520.
Sari, D. P., Putra, R. A., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Technology access and instructional ef-fectiveness in recovery learning pro-grams. Journal of Education and Learn-ing, 18(1), 95–108.
Torres, P. D. (2021). Active engagement of stakeholders during the pandemic: Basis for creating flexible learning environ-ment for students. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(2), 466-476.
UNESCO. (2021). Trensds in education and teaching development: Global perspec-tives. UNESCO Report. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102374
Villanueva, J. P., Ramos, A. R., & Bautista, L. S. (2023). School and local government col-laboration in educational program im-plementation. Asia Pacific Education Re-view, 24(3), 451–463.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joyce E. Atrero, Esmen M. Cabal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
