OpenAI ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing: Similarity Index and Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Based Contents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.03.15Keywords:
Bard, Bing, Chatgpt, Google, Microsoft, Open AIAbstract
This research compares AI language models—specifically, OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Bard, and Microsoft's Bing—by analyzing their originality, use of external sources, and performance. Conducted on August 5, 2023, the study evaluates how these models respond to different queries, revealing distinct characteristics. ChatGPT stands out with lower similarity scores and lesser reliance on online sources, indicating its potential for creating more unique content. In contrast, Bard and Bing show higher similarity scores, suggesting they draw more from available online content, which could be beneficial for tasks requiring context-rich information. While ChatGPT and Bard excel in grasping context, generating substantial content, and offering relevant insights, there are concerns about accuracy and consistency across queries. Notably, Bing's focus on aiding content creation rather than direct essay generation showcases diverse strengths among AI models. As AI technology progresses, refining these models and addressing inconsistencies will improve their usefulness across various applications. These findings guide users in choosing AI tools that fit their content needs and ensure the credibility of generated outputs.
Downloads
References
Bautista, R. M., & Pentang, J. T. (2022). Ctrl C + Ctrl V: Plagiarism and Knowledge on Ref-erencing and Citation among Pre-service Teachers. International Journal of Multi-disciplinary: Applied Business and Educa-tion Research, 3(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.11594/IJMABER.03.02.10
Bhardwaz, S., & Kumar, J. (2023). An Extensive Comparative Analysis of Chatbot Tech-nologies - ChatGPT, Google BARD and Mi-crosoft Bing. Proceedings of the 2nd In-ternational Conference on Applied Artifi-cial Intelligence and Computing, ICAAIC 2023, 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAIC56838.2023.10140214
Bray, C., Bryson, C., & Zawisza, K. (2023). TIPS Lunch - Faculty Session on ChatGPT: As-sessments, Assignments, and Academic Integrity. Publications and Presentations. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/wctfscpub/55
Campued, J. C., Papa, D.-M. M., Castro, A. C. de, & Malang, B. P. (2023). Exploring Chal-lenges and Opportunities: Evaluating the Awareness and Readiness of Selected Government Agencies in Adopting Artifi-cial Intelligence (AI). International Jour-nal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(12), 4504–4517. https://doi.org/10.11594/IJMABER.04.12.26
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (n.d.). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.35542/OSF.IO/MRZ8H
Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin®. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074110
Harte, P., & Khaleel, F. (2023). Keep calm and carry on: ChatGPT doesn’t change a thing for academic integrity. https://napier-reposito-ry.worktribe.com/output/3048214/keep-calm-and-carry-on-chatgpt-doesnt-change-a-thing-for-academic-integrity
King, M. R. (2023). Can Bard, Google’s Experi-mental Chatbot Based on the LaMDA Large Language Model, Help to Analyze the Gender and Racial Diversity of Au-thors in Your Cited Scientific References? Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-023-00761-3
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Mobo, F. D. (2021). The Role of Emerging Trends in Education. International Jour-nal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(10), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.11594/IJMABER.02.10.07
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity consid-erations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and be-yond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2), 07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Rahsepar, A. A., Tavakoli, N., Kim, G. H. J., Has-sani, C., Abtin, F., & Bedayat, A. (2023). How AI Responds to Common Lung Can-cer Questions: ChatGPT vs Google Bard. Radiology, 307(5), e230922. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230922
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and Rev-olution in Artificial Intelligence in Educa-tion. International Journal of Artificial In-telligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40593-016-0110-3/TABLES/8
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2212.09292
Tangermann, V. (2023). College Student Caught Submitting Paper Using ChatGPT. https://futurism.com/college-student-caught-writing-paper-chatgpt
Ventayen, R. J. M. (2023). OpenAI ChatGPT-Generated Results: Similarity Index of
Artificial Intelligence-Based Contents. Soft Computing for Security Applications, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3608-3_15
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User Experience: Im-plications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4312418
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
